World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
104
Citations
39594
World Ranking
665
National Ranking
47

Stefan J. Teipel publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan J. Teipel sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 847 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Stefan J. Teipel D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan J. Teipel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stefan J. Teipel is affiliated with the German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on neurodegenerative disorders, with a strong emphasis on Alzheimer's disease and related cognitive impairments.

Their scholarly work spans several main fields of study, including Medicine and Neuroscience. Within these broad domains, they have contributed extensively to subfields such as Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology, Neurology, and General Health Professions.

The scientist's principal research topics include:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Alzheimer's Disease Research and Treatments
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

Stefan J. Teipel has published papers in several well-established venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
  • Alzheimer s Research & Therapy
  • Neurobiology of Aging

Among recent published papers are:

  • In vivo staging of regional amyloid deposition, 2022, Columbia Academic Commons (Columbia University)
  • Measures of resting state EEG rhythms for clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease: Recommendations of an expert panel, 2021, Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • Designing the next-generation clinical care pathway for Alzheimer's disease, 2022, Nature Aging
  • Mediterranean Diet, Alzheimer Disease Biomarkers, and Brain Atrophy in Old Age, 2021, Neurology
  • Plasma extracellular vesicle tau and TDP-43 as diagnostic biomarkers in FTD and ALS, 2024, Nature Medicine

The scientist collaborates frequently with multiple co-authors, including Annika Spottke, Anja Schneider, Oliver Peters, Jens Wiltfang, and Josef Priller. These collaborations reflect ongoing research networks within neurodegenerative disease studies and related clinical and neuroscience fields.

Best Publications

  • Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration

    Joanna M. Wardlaw;Eric E. Smith;Geert J Biessels;Charlotte Cordonnier

  • Biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: academic, industry and regulatory perspectives

    Harald Hampel;Richard Frank;Karl Broich;Stefan J. Teipel

  • CSF phosphorylated tau protein correlates with neocortical neurofibrillary pathology in Alzheimer's disease

    Katharina Buerger;Michael Ewers;Tuula Pirttila;Raymond Zinkowski

  • Core candidate neurochemical and imaging biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease*

    Harald Hampel;Harald Hampel;Katharina Bürger;Stefan J. Teipel;Arun L.W. Bokde;Arun L.W. Bokde

  • Strategic roadmap for an early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease based on biomarkers

    Giovanni B Frisoni;Marina Boccardi;Frederik Barkhof;Kaj Blennow;Kaj Blennow

  • Measurement of phosphorylated tau epitopes in the differential diagnosis of Alzheimer disease: a comparative cerebrospinal fluid study.

    Harald Hampel;Katharina Buerger;Raymond Zinkowski;Stefan J. Teipel

  • Focal Decline of Cortical Thickness in Alzheimer's Disease Identified by Computational Neuroanatomy

    Jason P. Lerch;Jens C. Pruessner;Alex Zijdenbos;Harald Hampel

  • In vivo staging of regional amyloid deposition

    Michel J. Grothe;Henryk Barthel;Jorge Sepulcre;Martin Dyrba

  • Intravenous immunoglobulins containing antibodies against β-amyloid for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease

    R C Dodel;Y Du;C Depboylu;H Hampel

  • Automated detection of brain atrophy patterns based on MRI for the prediction of Alzheimer's disease.

    Claudia Plant;Stefan J. Teipel;Stefan J. Teipel;Annahita Oswald;Christian Böhm

  • Value of CSF beta-amyloid1-42 and tau as predictors of Alzheimer's disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment.

    H. Hampel;S. J. Teipel;T. Fuchsberger;N. Andreasen

  • Automated cortical thickness measurements from MRI can accurately separate Alzheimer's patients from normal elderly controls.

    Jason P. Lerch;Jens Pruessner;Jens Pruessner;Alex P. Zijdenbos;D. Louis Collins

  • Differential diagnosis of Alzheimer disease with cerebrospinal fluid levels of tau protein phosphorylated at threonine 231.

    Katharina Buerger;Raymond Zinkowski;Stefan J. Teipel;Tero Tapiola

  • CSF tau protein phosphorylated at threonine 231 correlates with cognitive decline in MCI subjects.

    K. Buerger;S. J. Teipel;Ray Zinkowski;K. Blennow

  • The future of Alzheimer's disease: the next 10 years.

    Harald Hampel;David Prvulovic;Stefan Teipel;Frank Jessen

  • Atrophy of the Cholinergic Basal Forebrain Over the Adult Age Range and in Early Stages of Alzheimer's Disease

    Michel Grothe;Helmut Heinsen;Stefan J. Teipel

  • Functional connectivity of the fusiform gyrus during a face-matching task in subjects with mild cognitive impairment.

    A. L. W. Bokde;P. Lopez-Bayo;T. Meindl;S. Pechler

  • Multimodal imaging in Alzheimer's disease: validity and usefulness for early detection

    Stefan Teipel;Stefan Teipel;Alexander Drzezga;Michel J Grothe;Michel J Grothe;Henryk Barthel

  • Measurement of basal forebrain atrophy in Alzheimer's disease using MRI

    Stefan J. Teipel;Wilhelm H. Flatz;Helmut Heinsen;Arun L. W. Bokde

  • White matter damage in Alzheimer disease and mild cognitive impairment: assessment with diffusion-tensor MR imaging and parallel imaging techniques.

    Robert Stahl;Olaf Dietrich;Stefan J Teipel;Harald Hampel

  • Corpus Callosum Atrophy Is a Possible Indicator of Region– and Cell Type–Specific Neuronal Degeneration in Alzheimer Disease: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis

    Harald Hampel;Stefan J. Teipel;Stefan J. Teipel;Gene E. Alexander;Barry Horwitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Harald Hampel
Harald Hampel Eisai (United States)
Michel J. Grothe
Michel J. Grothe Institute of Biomedicine of Seville
Katharina Buerger
Katharina Buerger Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Oliver Peters
Oliver Peters German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Frank Jessen
Frank Jessen University of Cologne
Emrah Düzel
Emrah Düzel German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases
Jens Wiltfang
Jens Wiltfang University of Göttingen
Christoph Laske
Christoph Laske University of Tübingen
Josef Priller
Josef Priller Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Michael Ewers
Michael Ewers Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Stefan J. Teipel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles