World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
39
Citations
9647
World Ranking
8229
National Ranking
692

Ulrich Palm publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Palm sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 154 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ulrich Palm D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Palm sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ulrich Palm is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany. Their research primarily spans neuroscience and medicine, with significant contributions in the fields of neurology, cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, anesthesiology and pain medicine, and clinical psychology.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Pain Management and Treatment
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Ulrich Palm has published extensively in several scientific venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Brain Sciences
  • Neurophysiologie Clinique
  • Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry
  • European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience

Recent notable papers by Ulrich Palm feature a range of topics related to brain stimulation and neuropsychiatric treatments, such as:

  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018), 2020, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Corrigendum to "Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018)" [Clin. Neurophysiol. 131 (2020) 474-528], 2020, Clinical Neurophysiology
  • Transcranial direct current stimulation as an additional treatment to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in adults with major depressive disorder in Germany (DepressionDC): a triple-blind, randomised, sham-controlled, multicentre trial, 2023, The Lancet
  • Gamma transcranial alternating current stimulation improves mood and cognition in patients with major depression, 2020, Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • Time-course of the tDCS antidepressant effect: An individual participant data meta-analysis, 2023, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry

Throughout their career, Ulrich Palm has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Frank Padberg
  • Alkomiet Hasan
  • André R. Brunoni
  • Jérôme Brunelin
  • Ulrike Kumpf

Best Publications

  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014–2018)

    Jean Pascal Lefaucheur;André Aleman;Chris Baeken;David H. Benninger

  • Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

    Jean Pascal Lefaucheur;Andrea Antal;Samar S. Ayache;David H. Benninger

  • Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Changes Connectivity of Resting-State Networks during fMRI

    Daniel Keeser;Thomas Meindl;Julie Bor;Ulrich Palm

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation for acute major depressive episodes: meta-analysis of individual patient data.

    André R. Brunoni;Adriano H. Moffa;Felipe Fregni;Ulrich Palm

  • Prefrontal direct current stimulation modulates resting EEG and event-related potentials in healthy subjects: A standardized low resolution tomography (sLORETA) study

    Daniel Keeser;Frank Padberg;E. Reisinger;Oliver Pogarell

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation in treatment resistant depression: A randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study

    U. Palm;C. Schiller;Z. Fintescu;M. Obermeier

  • Evaluation of sham transcranial direct current stimulation for randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials.

    Ulrich Palm;Eva Reisinger;Daniel Keeser;Min-Fang Kuo

  • Skin lesions after treatment with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

    Ulrich Palm;Daniel Keeser;Christina Schiller;Zoe Fintescu

  • Sham tDCS: A hidden source of variability? Reflections for further blinded, controlled trials

    Clara Fonteneau;Marine Mondino;Martijn Arns;Chris Baeken

  • tDCS for the treatment of depression: a comprehensive review

    Ulrich Palm;Alkomiet Hasan;Wolfgang Strube;Frank Padberg

  • Efficacy and acceptability of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for major depressive disorder: An individual patient data meta-analysis

    Adriano H. Moffa;Donel Martin;Angelo Alonzo;Djamila Bennabi

  • Vagus nerve stimulation in psychiatry: a systematic review of the available evidence.

    Camelia-Lucia Cimpianu;Wolfgang Strube;Peter Falkai;Ulrich Palm

  • Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Schizophrenia With Predominant Negative Symptoms: A Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Proof-of-Concept Study

    Ulrich Palm;Daniel Keeser;Alkomiet Hasan;Michael J. Kupka

  • Prefrontal tDCS Decreases Pain in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

    Samar S. Ayache;Ulrich Palm;Moussa A. Chalah;Tarik Al-Ani

  • Corrigendum to "Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014-2018)" [Clin. Neurophysiol. 131 (2020) 474-528].

    Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur;André Aleman;Chris Baeken;David H Benninger

  • Home Use, Remotely Supervised, and Remotely Controlled Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Systematic Review of the Available Evidence.

    Ulrich Palm;Ulrike Kumpf;Nora Behler;Linda Wulf

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation in children and adolescents: a comprehensive review.

    Ulrich Palm;Felix M. Segmiller;Ann Natascha Epple;Franz-Joseph Freisleder

  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A Systematic Review.

    Jérôme Brunelin;Marine Mondino;Rémy Bation;Ulrich Palm

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation as an additional treatment to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in adults with major depressive disorder in Germany (DepressionDC): a triple-blind, randomised, sham-controlled, multicentre trial

    Unknown

  • The role of contact media at the skin-electrode interface during transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).

    Ulrich Palm;Katrina B. Feichtner;Alkomiet Hasan;Gerd Gauglitz

  • Bidirectional variability in motor cortex excitability modulation following 1 mA transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy participants

    Wolfgang Strube;Tilmann Bunse;Michael A. Nitsche;Alexandra Nikolaeva

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank Padberg
Frank Padberg Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Alkomiet Hasan
Alkomiet Hasan University of Augsburg
Samar S. Ayache
Samar S. Ayache Université Paris Cité
Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur
Jean-Pascal Lefaucheur Paris-Est Créteil University
Andre R. Brunoni
Andre R. Brunoni Universidade de São Paulo
Daniel Keeser
Daniel Keeser Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Jerome Brunelin
Jerome Brunelin Jean Monnet University
Oliver Pogarell
Oliver Pogarell Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Peter Falkai
Peter Falkai Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Berthold Langguth
Berthold Langguth University of Regensburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering Neuroscience in the USA opens doors to a variety of exciting educational and career options. Students looking for rapid entry into the field may benefit from 2 year accelerated bachelor degrees online, which allow candidates to complete their studies faster and start building professional experience sooner.

Neuroscience is closely tied to some of the highest paying degrees in the world, especially when paired with disciplines like computer science or biomedical engineering. Cross-disciplinary expertise can significantly boost earning potential and job opportunities.

Students may also want to explore fields listed among the most profitable majors. Combining neuroscience with these majors can open further pathways into research, healthcare, and technology sectors.

Importantly, affordability remains a key concern. Many online colleges that accept financial aid can help make higher education more accessible. Investigating available aid and scholarship options ensures students can pursue their academic goals without excessive financial burden.

Best Scientists Citing Ulrich Palm

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles