World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
93
Citations
33220
World Ranking
10852
National Ranking
589

Wolfgang Gaebel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolfgang Gaebel sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 650 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Wolfgang Gaebel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wolfgang Gaebel sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2001 - German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Neurosciences

Overview

Wolfgang Gaebel is affiliated with Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf in Germany. Their research spans across main fields of Medicine and Psychology, with specific focus on subfields such as Psychiatry and Mental Health, Clinical Psychology, Philosophy, General Health Professions, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Clinical practice guidelines implementation

Among their recent publications are the following papers:

  • "Mental, behavioral and neurodevelopmental disorders in the ICD-11: an international perspective on key changes and controversies," 2020, BMC Medicine
  • "The clinical characterization of the patient with primary psychosis aimed at personalization of management," 2021, World Psychiatry
  • "EPA guidance on assessment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia," 2021, European Psychiatry
  • "Multivariate genome-wide association meta-analysis of over 1 million subjects identifies loci underlying multiple substance use disorders," 2023, Nature Mental Health
  • "An organization- and category-level comparison of diagnostic requirements for mental disorders in ICD-11 and DSM-5," 2021, World Psychiatry

Wolfgang Gaebel has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Peter Falkai (25 joint publications)
  • Alkomiet Hasan (17 joint publications)
  • Elias Wagner (10 joint publications)
  • Geoffrey M. Reed (9 joint publications)
  • Eva Salveridou-Hof (9 joint publications)

The scientist has published repeatedly in various journals such as:

  • European Psychiatry (13 publications)
  • Fortschritte der Neurologie · Psychiatrie (8 publications)
  • World Psychiatry (5 publications)
  • European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience (5 publications)
  • Schizophrenia Research (3 publications)

Wolfgang Gaebel has contributed to book publications with Cambridge University Press, including titles like:

  • Mental Health Research and Practice (2024)
  • Making Sense of the ICD-11 (2023)

In recognition of contributions in the field of neurosciences, Wolfgang Gaebel received the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina award in 2001.

Best Publications

  • Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in first-episode schizophrenia and schizophreniform disorder: an open randomised clinical trial

    René S. Kahn;W. Wolfgang Fleischhacker;Han Boter;Michael Davidson

  • Social Cognition in Schizophrenia: An NIMH Workshop on Definitions, Assessment, and Research Opportunities

    Michael F. Green;David L. Penn;Richard Bentall;William T. Carpenter;William T. Carpenter

  • Definition and description of schizophrenia in the DSM-5

    Rajiv Tandon;Wolfgang Gaebel;M Deanna;Juan Bustillo

  • Psychische Störungen in der Allgemeinbevölkerung

    F. Jacobi;M. Höfler;J. Strehle;S. Mack

  • Excess mortality in persons with severe mental disorders: a multilevel intervention framework and priorities for clinical practice, policy and research agendas

    Nancy H. Liu;Nancy H. Liu;Gail L. Daumit;Tarun Dua;Ralph Aquila

  • Innovations and changes in the ICD-11 classification of mental, behavioural and neurodevelopmental disorders

    Geoffrey M. Reed;Michael B. First;Cary S. Kogan;Steven E. Hyman

  • Twelve-month prevalence, comorbidity and correlates of mental disorders in Germany: the Mental Health Module of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1-MH)

    Frank Jacobi;Frank Jacobi;Michael Höfler;Jens Siegert;Simon Mack

  • Erratum zu: Psychische Störungen in der Allgemeinbevölkerung. Studie zur Gesundheit Erwachsener in Deutschland und ihr Zusatzmodul „Psychische Gesundheit“ (DEGS1-MH)

    F. Jacobi;M. Höfler;J. Strehle;S. Mack

  • Genome-wide association study of alcohol dependence.

    Jens Treutlein;Sven Cichon;Monika Ridinger;Norbert Wodarz

  • Cognitive Effects of Antipsychotic Drugs in First-Episode Schizophrenia and Schizophreniform Disorder: A Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial (EUFEST)

    Michael Davidson;Silvana Galderisi;Mark Weiser;Nomi Werbeloff

  • Remediation of impairments in facial affect recognition in schizophrenia: efficacy and specificity of a new training program.

    Wolfgang Wölwer;Nicole Frommann;Sabine Halfmann;Anja Piaszek

  • Subcortical Correlates of Craving in Recently Abstinent Alcoholic Patients

    Frank Schneider;Ute Habel;Michael Wagner;Petra Franke

  • WPA guidance on how to combat stigmatization of psychiatry and psychiatrists.

    Norman Sartorius;Wolfgang Gaebel;Helen-Rose Cleveland;Heather Stuart

  • Prediction of psychosis by mismatch negativity.

    Mitja Bodatsch;Stephan Ruhrmann;Michael Wagner;Ralf Müller

  • Response and remission criteria in major depression – A validation of current practice

    Michael Riedel;Hans-Jürgen Möller;Michael Obermeier;Rebecca Schennach-Wolff

  • Structure of the psychotic disorders classification in DSM-5.

    Stephan Heckers;M Deanna;Juan Bustillo;Wolfgang Gaebel

  • Side effects of atypical antipsychotics: a brief overview

    Alp Üçok;Wolfgang Gaebel

  • Early detection and secondary prevention of psychosis: facts and visions.

    Heinz Häfner;Kurt Maurer;Stephan Ruhrmann;Andreas Bechdolf

  • Schizophrenia practice guidelines: international survey and comparison.

    Wolfgang Gaebel;Stefan Weinmann;Norman Sartorius;Wolfgang Rutz

  • A conceptual framework for the revision of the ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders

    S. E. Hyman;G. Andrews;J. L. Ayuso-Mateos;W. Gaebel

Frequent Co-Authors

Wolfgang Wölwer
Wolfgang Wölwer Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Peter Falkai
Peter Falkai Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Wolfgang Maier
Wolfgang Maier University of Bonn
Joachim Klosterkötter
Joachim Klosterkötter University of Cologne
Hans-Jürgen Möller
Hans-Jürgen Möller Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Frank Schneider
Frank Schneider Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Isabella Heuser
Isabella Heuser Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Michael Wagner
Michael Wagner TU Dresden
Alkomiet Hasan
Alkomiet Hasan University of Augsburg
Marcella Rietschel
Marcella Rietschel Heidelberg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore studying Medicine in the USA, it’s important to know there are flexible online degree options and diverse career pathways in healthcare. Whether you’re seeking advanced clinical roles or opportunities in healthcare management, online programs make it easier to enhance your qualifications.

Nurses looking to expand their scope can consider an rn to np bridge program, which streamlines the pathway to becoming a nurse practitioner. If leadership is your goal, the best online mha programs offer the skills needed for healthcare administration and management roles.

For those interested in clinical advancement, an rn to bsn online no clinicals option allows registered nurses to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing with added flexibility and without on-site requirements. Alternatively, if you aim to support wellness and preventive care, consider earning an online bachelor's degree in nutrition.

These online programs create pathways to rewarding roles in healthcare, making advanced education accessible for students at all stages of their careers.

Best Scientists Citing Wolfgang Gaebel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles