World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
59
Citations
16161
World Ranking
12358
National Ranking
881

Marco Thines publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Thines sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 278 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Marco Thines D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Thines sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marco Thines is affiliated with Goethe University Frankfurt in Germany. Their research primarily spans the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. The focus of their publications emphasizes various aspects of plant science, molecular biology, cell biology, and ecology related to fungi and plant-pathogen interactions.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Plant Pathogens and Resistance
  • Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
  • Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
  • Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Frequent publication venues for Marco Thines include:

  • Mycological Progress
  • Fungal Systematics and Evolution
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • European Journal of Plant Pathology
  • IMA Fungus

Some of the recent published papers associated with their field of study are:

  • Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa - 2021 (2022, Mycosphere)
  • Unambiguous identification of fungi: where do we stand and how accurate and precise is fungal DNA barcoding? (2020, IMA Fungus)
  • Fungal taxonomy and sequence-based nomenclature (2021, Nature Microbiology)
  • How to publish a new fungal species, or name, version 3.0 (2021, IMA Fungus)
  • What is a species in fungal plant pathogens? (2021, Fungal Diversity)

Frequent collaborators in their academic work include:

  • Sebastian Ploch
  • Anthony Buaya
  • Bagdevi Mishra
  • Kevin D. Hyde
  • Andrey Yurkov

Marco Thines's contributions broadly address fungal biology within plant science, integrating molecular and genetic techniques to explore fungal taxonomy, plant-pathogen interactions, and plant immunity mechanisms. Their body of work contributes to understanding disease resistance and the complex interactions between plants and fungi at multiple biological levels.

Best Publications

  • Genome sequence and analysis of the Irish potato famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans.

    Brian J Haas;Sophien Kamoun;Sophien Kamoun;Michael C Zody;Michael C Zody;Rays H Y Jiang;Rays H Y Jiang

  • Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa

    N. N. Wijayawardene;K. D. Hyde;L. K. T. Al-Ani;L. K. T. Al-Ani;L. Tedersoo

  • Signatures of adaptation to obligate biotrophy in the Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis genome

    Laura Baxter;Sucheta Tripathy;Naveed Ishaque;Nico Boot

  • Genome evolution following host jumps in the Irish potato famine pathogen lineage

    Sylvain Raffaele;Rhys A. Farrer;Liliana M. Cano;David J. Studholme

  • The Amsterdam Declaration on Fungal Nomenclature

    David L. Hawksworth;David L. Hawksworth;Pedro W. Crous;Scott A. Redhead;Don R. Reynolds

  • Unambiguous identification of fungi: where do we stand and how accurate and precise is fungal DNA barcoding?

    Robert Lücking;M. Catherine Aime;Barbara Robbertse;Andrew N. Miller

  • The rise and fall of the Phytophthora infestans lineage that triggered the Irish potato famine.

    Kentaro Yoshida;Verena J. Schuenemann;Lililana M. Cano;Marina Pais

  • Genome sequence of the necrotrophic plant pathogen Pythium ultimum reveals original pathogenicity mechanisms and effector repertoire

    C. André Lévesque;C. André Lévesque;Henk Brouwer;Liliana Cano;John P Hamilton

  • Ancient class of translocated oomycete effectors targets the host nucleus

    Sebastian Schornack;Mireille van Damme;Tolga O. Bozkurt;Liliana M. Cano

  • Fusarium: more than a node or a foot-shaped basal cell.

    P.W. Crous;P.W. Crous;L. Lombard;M. Sandoval-Denis;K.A. Seifert

  • Genome sequencing and mapping reveal loss of heterozygosity as a mechanism for rapid adaptation in the vegetable pathogen Phytophthora capsici.

    Kurt H. Lamour;Joann Mudge;Daniel Gobena;Oscar P. Hurtado-Gonzales

  • Oomycete-plant coevolution: recent advances and future prospects.

    Marco Thines;Sophien Kamoun

  • Ten things to know about oomycete effectors

    Sebastian Schornack;Edgar Huitema;Liliana M. Cano;Tolga O. Bozkurt

  • Fungal taxonomy and sequence-based nomenclature.

    Robert Lücking;M. Catherine Aime;Barbara Robbertse;Andrew N. Miller

  • Phylogeny and evolution of plant pathogenic oomycetes—a global overview

    Marco Thines

  • Towards a universal barcode of oomycetes--a comparison of the cox1 and cox2 loci.

    Young Joon Choi;Gordon Beakes;Sally Glockling;Julia Kruse

  • An Illumina metabarcoding pipeline for fungi

    Miklós Bálint;Philipp-André Schmidt;Rahul Sharma;Marco Thines

  • Recent developments in effector biology of filamentous plant pathogens

    Ricardo Oliva;Joe Win;Sylvain Raffaele;Laurence Boutemy

  • Evolution, Diversity, and Taxonomy of the Peronosporaceae, with Focus on the Genus Peronospora

    Marco Thines;Young-Joon Choi

  • 3 Systematics of the Straminipila: Labyrinthulomycota, Hyphochytriomycota, and Oomycota

    Gordon W. Beakes;Daiske Honda;Marco Thines

Frequent Co-Authors

Hyeon-Dong Shin
Hyeon-Dong Shin Kunsan National University
Sophien Kamoun
Sophien Kamoun University of East Anglia
Otmar Spring
Otmar Spring University of Hohenheim
Kevin D. Hyde
Kevin D. Hyde Mae Fah Luang University
Pedro W. Crous
Pedro W. Crous Utrecht University
Hermann Voglmayr
Hermann Voglmayr University of Vienna
David L. Hawksworth
David L. Hawksworth Royal Botanic Gardens
Liliana M. Cano
Liliana M. Cano University of Florida
Roger G. Shivas
Roger G. Shivas University of Southern Queensland
Vincent Robert
Vincent Robert Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse online degrees and specialized career paths. If you’re interested in health and wellness, consider pursuing one of the cheapest online nutrition degree programs. These affordable options can equip you with essential knowledge in dietary science and open up opportunities in community health and clinical nutrition settings.

For those with a nursing background, advancing your qualifications is easier than ever with the best online rn to bsn programs. These flexible programs are designed for working nurses seeking to expand their skills and career options.

If you’re interested in the organizational side of healthcare, a degree in healthcare management can quickly prepare you for leadership roles in various medical institutions, equipping you with crucial management and administrative expertise.

Mental health is also a growing field. The shortest pmhnp program is ideal for those who wish to become psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioners rapidly, allowing you to address critical mental health needs in your community.

Best Scientists Citing Marco Thines

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles