World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Hermann Voglmayr

Hermann Voglmayr

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 47 2536 2350 16 16 204 8158

Hermann Voglmayr publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hermann Voglmayr between 1996 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hermann Voglmayr published across 31 years, from 1996 to 2026, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2020. 12 of the 221 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2020. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 5 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 9 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 1 publication
1996 2026

221 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hermann Voglmayr: publications per year, 1996 to 2026
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 5
1998 2
1999 1
2000 1
2001 1
2002 2
2003 6
2004 3
2005 1
2006 3
2007 3
2008 9
2009 5
2010 1
2011 9
2012 10
2013 5
2014 10
2015 9
2016 12
2017 8
2018 20
2019 21
2020 26
2021 10
2022 12
2023 4
2024 9
2025 11
2026 1
Total 221
Download as CSV

Hermann Voglmayr publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hermann Voglmayr sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–205 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 204 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71 204
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Hermann Voglmayr D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hermann Voglmayr sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143 47
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Genus
  • Fungus

His main research concerns Botany, Phylogenetics, Peronosporaceae, Phylogenetic tree and Hyaloperonospora. His Botany study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Diaporthales and Capnodiales. As part of the same scientific family, Hermann Voglmayr usually focuses on Phylogenetics, concentrating on Peronospora and intersecting with Plant taxonomy, Taxonomy, Genetic divergence and Genetic diversity.

His studies deal with areas such as Maximum parsimony and Monophyly as well as Peronosporaceae. Hermann Voglmayr has researched Phylogenetic tree in several fields, including Evolutionary biology, Systematics and Ascomycota. His study in Hyaloperonospora is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Paraphyly and Downy mildew.

His most cited work include:

  • Nuclear DNA content and genome size of trout and human. (780 citations)
  • DNA barcoding of oomycetes with cytochrome c oxidase subunit I and internal transcribed spacer. (301 citations)
  • Phylogenetic relationships of the downy mildews (Peronosporales) and related groups based on nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences (199 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Hermann Voglmayr mostly deals with Botany, Phylogenetic tree, Genus, Taxonomy and Phylogenetics. His Botany research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Ascomycota, Diaporthales, Ribosomal DNA and Peronosporaceae. While the research belongs to areas of Peronosporaceae, he spends his time largely on the problem of Plasmopara, intersecting his research to questions surrounding Bremia.

His Phylogenetic tree research incorporates themes from Evolutionary biology and Type. The various areas that Hermann Voglmayr examines in his Genus study include Xylariales, Synonym and Monophyly. His Taxonomy research includes elements of Hyphomycetes, Fungi imperfecti and Conidium.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (72.11%)
  • Phylogenetic tree (41.50%)
  • Genus (28.57%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?

  • Botany (72.11%)
  • Phylogenetic tree (41.50%)
  • Genus (28.57%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Hermann Voglmayr focuses on Botany, Phylogenetic tree, Genus, Evolutionary biology and Diaporthales. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Hypocreales, Sordariomycetes, Clade and Ribosomal DNA. The Phylogenetic tree study combines topics in areas such as Taxonomy, Ascomycota and Type.

His Genus research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Xylariales, Sister group, GenBank and Pinicola. His work carried out in the field of Evolutionary biology brings together such families of science as Taxon, Biotechnology, Lineage and Key. His Diaporthales research integrates issues from Systematics, Valsa and Subspecies.

Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Exploring the genomic diversity of black yeasts and relatives (Chaetothyriales, Ascomycota) (75 citations)
  • Resolution of morphology-based taxonomic delusions: Acrocordiella, Basiseptospora, Blogiascospora, Clypeosphaeria, Hymenopleella, Lepteutypa, Pseudapiospora, Requienella, Seiridium and Strickeria. (45 citations)
  • Recommendations for competing sexual-asexually typified generic names in Sordariomycetes (except Diaporthales, Hypocreales, and Magnaporthales). (42 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Genus
  • Botany
  • Fungus

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Phylogenetic tree, Botany, Genus, Pleosporales and Ascomycota. In his research, Taxon and Chaetothyriales is intimately related to Evolutionary biology, which falls under the overarching field of Phylogenetic tree. His Botany research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Diaporthales and ANT.

His Genus study improves the overall literature in Zoology. His Pleosporales study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Type, Dothideomycetes and Paraphyses. His Ascomycota research includes themes of Mutualism, Ecology, Hymenoptera, Taxonomy and Phylogenetics.

Best Publications

  • DNA barcoding of oomycetes with cytochrome c oxidase subunit I and internal transcribed spacer.

    Gregg P Robideau;Gregg P Robideau;Arthur W A M De Cock;Michael D Coffey;Hermann Voglmayr

  • Phylogenetic relationships of the downy mildews (Peronosporales) and related groups based on nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences

    A. Riethmüller;H. Voglmayr;M. Göker;M. Weiß

  • Preserving accuracy in GenBank

    Thomas D. Bruns;Meredith Blackwell;Ivan Edwards;Andy F.S. Taylor

  • Biodiversity of Trichoderma (Hypocreaceae) in Southern Europe and Macaronesia

    W.M. Jaklitsch;H. Voglmayr;H. Voglmayr

  • Molecular Taxonomy of Phytopathogenic Fungi: A Case Study in Peronospora

    Markus Göker;Gema García-Blázquez;Hermann Voglmayr;M. Teresa Tellería

  • Towards a universal barcode of oomycetes--a comparison of the cox1 and cox2 loci.

    Young Joon Choi;Gordon Beakes;Sally Glockling;Julia Kruse

  • Phylogenetic relationships of Peronospora and related genera based on nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences

    Hermann Voglmayr

  • Exploring the genomic diversity of black yeasts and relatives (Chaetothyriales, Ascomycota)

    M.M. Teixeira;M.M. Teixeira;L.F. Moreno;L.F. Moreno;L.F. Moreno;B.J. Stielow;A. Muszewska

  • Recommendations of generic names in Diaporthales competing for protection or use

    Amy Y. Rossman;Gerard C. Adams;Paul F. Cannon;Lisa A. Castlebury

  • The Genera of Fungi - fixing the application of the type species of generic names - G 2: Allantophomopsis, Latorua, Macrodiplodiopsis, Macrohilum, Milospium, Protostegia, Pyricularia, Robillarda, Rotula, Septoriella, Torula, and Wojnowicia

    Pedro W Crous;Lori M Carris;Alejandra Giraldo;Johannes Z Groenewald

  • Preserving accuracy in GenBank

    M. I. Bidartondo;Thomas D. Bruns;Meredith Blackwell;Ivan Edwards

  • The diversity of ant-associated black yeasts: insights into a newly discovered world of symbiotic interactions

    Hermann Voglmayr;Veronika Mayer;Ulrich Maschwitz;Joachim Moog

  • Taxonomic aspects of Peronosporaceae inferred from Bayesian molecular phylogenetics

    M Göker;H Voglmayr;A Riethmüller;M Weiß

  • How do obligate parasites evolve? A multi-gene phylogenetic analysis of downy mildews

    Markus Göker;Hermann Voglmayr;Alexandra Riethmüller;Franz Oberwinkler

  • Resolution of morphology-based taxonomic delusions: Acrocordiella, Basiseptospora, Blogiascospora, Clypeosphaeria, Hymenopleella, Lepteutypa, Pseudapiospora, Requienella, Seiridium and Strickeria.

    W.M. Jaklitsch;A. Gardiennet;H. Voglmayr

  • Phylogenetic relationships of Plasmopara, Bremia and other genera of downy mildew pathogens with pyriform haustoria based on Bayesian analysis of partial LSU rDNA sequence data

    Hermann Voglmayr;Alexandra Riethmüller;Markus Göker;Michael Weiss

  • Phylogeny of Hyaloperonospora based on nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer sequences

    Markus Göker;Alexandra Riethmüller;Hermann Voglmayr;Michael Weiss

  • Recommendations for competing sexual-asexually typified generic names in Sordariomycetes (except Diaporthales, Hypocreales, and Magnaporthales).

    Martina Réblová;Andrew Nicholas Miller;Amy Y. Rossman;Keith A. Seifert

  • Nuclear DNA Amounts in Mosses (Musci)

    Hermann Voglmayr

  • Plant-ants use symbiotic fungi as a food source: new insight into the nutritional ecology of ant–plant interactions

    Rumsaïs Blatrix;Champlain Djiéto-Lordon;Laurence Mondolot;Philippe La Fisca

  • Genome Size Determination in Peronosporales (Oomycota) by Feulgen Image Analysis

    Hermann Voglmayr;Johann Greilhuber

  • Species delimitation in downy mildews: the case of Hyaloperonospora in the light of nuclear ribosomal ITS and LSU sequences

    Markus Göker;Hermann Voglmayr;Gema García Blázquez;Franz Oberwinkler

  • Phylogenetic relationships of five genera of Xylariales and Rosasphaeria gen. nov. (Hypocreales)

    Walter M. Jaklitsch;Hermann Voglmayr

  • Prosthecium species with Stegonsporium anamorphs on Acer.

    Hermann Voglmayr;Walter M. Jaklitsch

  • Phylogenetic relationships of Albugo species (white blister rusts) based on LSU rDNA sequence and oospore data

    Hermann Voglmayr;Alexandra Riethmüller

  • Phylogenetic and taxonomic revision of Lopadostoma.

    W.M. Jaklitsch;J. Fournier;J.D. Rogers;H. Voglmayr

Frequent Co-Authors

Markus Göker
Markus Göker Leibniz Association
Pedro W. Crous
Pedro W. Crous Utrecht University
Marco Thines
Marco Thines Goethe University Frankfurt
Franz Oberwinkler
Franz Oberwinkler University of Tübingen
Andreas Vilcinskas
Andreas Vilcinskas University of Giessen
Ulf Thrane
Ulf Thrane Technical University of Denmark
Marc Stadler
Marc Stadler Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research
Hyeon-Dong Shin
Hyeon-Dong Shin Kunsan National University
Kristian Fog Nielsen
Kristian Fog Nielsen Technical University of Denmark
David L. Hawksworth
David L. Hawksworth Royal Botanic Gardens

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Hermann Voglmayr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles