World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

David J. Hole publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Hole sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David J. Hole D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Hole sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David J. Hole is affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom. Their research predominantly lies within the Agricultural and Biological Sciences field, with significant contributions to Plant Science, Genetics, Environmental Chemistry, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, and Global and Planetary Change as subfields of study.

The main topics addressed in their work include Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology, Genetics and Plant Breeding, Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics, Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals, Turfgrass Adaptation and Management, Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science, and Climate Change and Geoengineering.

David J. Hole has authored several papers, with recent publications including:

  • Comparative mapping and validation of multiple disease resistance QTL for simultaneously controlling common and dwarf bunt in bread wheat (2020) in Theoretical and Applied Genetics
  • Genetic mapping of the common and dwarf bunt resistance gene Bt12 descending from the wheat landrace PI119333 (2020) in Euphytica
  • Genetic characterization and genome-wide association mapping for dwarf bunt resistance in bread wheat accessions from the USDA National Small Grains Collection (2020) in Theoretical and Applied Genetics
  • Registration of 'Rulon', a six-row, spring feed barley (2024) in Journal of Plant Registrations
  • We Need the Largest Experiments on Earth to Achieve Our Climate Targets (2025) in Global Change Biology

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated with David J. Hole include Almuth Elise Muellner, Maria Buerstmayr, Babur Eshonkulov, Sebastian Michel, and Julia Hagenguth.

Their work has been published multiple times in venues such as Theoretical and Applied Genetics, Euphytica, Journal of Plant Registrations, and Global Change Biology.

Best Publications

  • A population-based study of the long-term risks associated with atrial fibrillation: 20-year follow-up of the Renfrew/Paisley study.

    Simon Stewart;Carole L Hart;David J Hole;John J.V McMurray

  • More ‘malignant’ than cancer? Five‐year survival following a first admission for heart failure

    Simon Stewart;Kate MacIntyre;David J. Hole;Simon Capewell

  • Impaired lung function and mortality risk in men and women: findings from the Renfrew and Paisley prospective population study

    D J Hole;G C M Watt;G Davey-Smith;C L Hart

  • Population prevalence, incidence, and predictors of atrial fibrillation in the Renfrew/Paisley study

    S Stewart;C L Hart;D J Hole;J J V McMurray

  • Education and occupational social class: which is the more important indicator of mortality risk?

    G Davey Smith;C Hart;D Hole;P MacKinnon

  • Adverse socioeconomic conditions in childhood and cause specific adult mortality: prospective observational study.

    George Davey Smith;Carole Hart;David Blane;David Hole

  • Individual social class, area-based deprivation, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and mortality: the Renfrew and Paisley Study.

    George Davey Smith;Carole Hart;Graham Watt;David Hole

  • Impact of variability among surgeons on postoperative morbidity and mortality and ultimate survival.

    C S McArdle;D Hole

  • Do inhibitors of angiotensin-I-converting enzyme protect against risk of cancer?

    Anthony F Lever;David J Hole;Charles R Gillis;Iain R McCallum

  • Impact of anastomotic leakage on long-term survival of patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer.

    C. S. McArdle;D. C. McMillan;D. J. Hole

  • Association of cardiovascular disease risk factors with socioeconomic position during childhood and during adulthood

    D. Blane;C. L. Hart;G. D. Smith;C. R. Gillis

  • Height and risk of death among men and women: aetiological implications of associations with cardiorespiratory disease and cancer mortality

    George Davey Smith;Carole Hart;Mark Upton;David Hole

  • Long-term cardiovascular consequences of obesity: 20-year follow-up of more than 15 000 middle-aged men and women (the Renfrew-Paisley study).

    N.F. Murphy;K. MacIntyre;S. Stewart;C.L. Hart

  • Benign melanocytic naevi as a risk factor for malignant melanoma.

    A. J. Swerdlow;J. English;R. M. Mackie;C. J. O'doherty

  • Emergency presentation of colorectal cancer is associated with poor 5‐year survival

    C. S. McArdle;D. J. Hole

  • Survival outcome of care by specialist surgeons in breast cancer: a study of 3786 patients in the west of Scotland.

    Charles R Gillis;David J Hole

  • Mortality in patients of the Glasgow Blood Pressure Clinic.

    Christopher G. Isles;Louise M. Walker;Gareth D. Beevers;Irene Brown

  • Relation between coronary risk and coronary mortality in women of the Renfrew and Paisley survey: comparison with men

    C.G. Isles;D.J. Hole;V.M. Hawthorne;A.F. Lever

  • Alcohol consumption and mortality from all causes, coronary heart disease, and stroke: results from a prospective cohort study of Scottish men with 21 years of follow up

    Carole L Hart;George Davey Smith;David J Hole;Victor M Hawthorne

  • Management of ovarian cancer: referral to a multidisciplinary team matters.

    EJ Junor;DJ Hole;CR Gillis

Frequent Co-Authors

George Davey Smith
George Davey Smith University of Bristol
John M. Starr
John M. Starr University of Edinburgh
Lawrence J. Whalley
Lawrence J. Whalley University of Aberdeen
Ian J. Deary
Ian J. Deary University of Edinburgh
Simon Stewart
Simon Stewart Torrens University Australia
Anthony J. Swerdlow
Anthony J. Swerdlow Institute of Cancer Research
John J.V. McMurray
John J.V. McMurray University of Glasgow
David Blane
David Blane University College London
Sudhesh Kumar
Sudhesh Kumar University of Warwick
Gary Frost
Gary Frost Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Medicine in the USA opens doors to various allied health degrees and advanced qualifications available online. Today, many healthcare professionals are considering top online mha programs that are cahme accredited to develop their leadership skills and move into healthcare administration roles.

For registered nurses, rn to bsn programs provide an accessible way to advance professionally, often without requiring on-site clinical work.

Those aiming for the highest level of nursing practice may be interested in the fastest online dnp programs, which offer accelerated pathways for existing nurses. Affordability is another key concern; many learners search for the cheapest dnp program to minimize costs without sacrificing quality.

Exploring these diverse online degree pathways can help you find an educational route that aligns with your career ambitions in the ever-evolving field of medicine.

Best Scientists Citing David J. Hole

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles