World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
12904
World Ranking
5148
National Ranking
2835

William M. Kurtines publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William M. Kurtines sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 112 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

William M. Kurtines D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William M. Kurtines sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1995 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

William M. Kurtines was affiliated with Florida International University in the United States. Their research career included contributions recognized by the American Psychological Association, which awarded them the status of Fellow in 1995.

Although there is no available data on specific papers, co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or detailed fields and subfields of study for William M. Kurtines, their association with a major research university indicates active engagement in academic research.

The data does not include information on specific research topics; however, the recognition by the American Psychological Association suggests involvement in fields related to psychology or behavioral sciences.

No recent publications or frequent collaborations are listed, and no particular research venues are noted in the available information. The absence of detailed publication data limits a comprehensive overview of their specific research contributions.

The fact that William M. Kurtines is deceased means that their research output and academic activities belong to a completed career. Their legacy includes the formal acknowledgment by the APA, marking a milestone in their professional journey.

Best Publications

  • Family psychology and cultural diversity: Opportunities for theory, research, and application.

    José Szapocznik;William M. Kurtines

  • Bicultural involvement and adjustment in Hispanic-American youths

    José Szapocznik;William M Kurtines;Tatjana Fernandez

  • Treating anxiety disorders in children with group cognitive-behaviorial therapy: a randomized clinical trial.

    Wendy K. Silverman;William M. Kurtines;Golda S. Ginsburg;Carl F. Weems

  • Engaging adolescent drug abusers and their families in treatment: a strategic structural systems approach.

    José Szapocznik;Angel Perez-Vidal;Andrew L. Brickman;Franklin H. Foote

  • Morality, moral behavior, and moral development

    Jacob L. Gewirtz;William M. Kurtines

  • Efficacy of brief strategic family therapy in modifying Hispanic adolescent behavior problems and substance use.

    Daniel A. Santisteban;J. Douglas Coatsworth;Angel Perez-Vidal;William M. Kurtines

  • Contingency management, self-control, and education support in the treatment of childhood phobic disorders: A randomized clinical trial.

    Wendy K. Silverman;William M. Kurtines;Golda S. Ginsburg;Carl F. Weems

  • Efficacy of intervention for engaging youth and families into treatment and some variables that may contribute to differential effectiveness.

    Daniel A. Santisteban;Jose Szapocznik;Angel Perez-Vidal;William M. Kurtines

  • The impact of exposure to crime and violence on urban youth

    Steven L. Berman;William M. Kurtines;Wendy K. Silverman;Lourdes T. Serafini

  • The development of moral thought: review and evaluation of Kohlberg's approach.

    William Kurtines;Esther B. Greif

  • Predictors of outcome in exposure-based cognitive and behavioral treatments for phobic and anxiety disorders in children*

    Steven L. Berman;Carl F. Weems;Wendy K. Silverman;William M. Kurtines

  • Structural family versus psychodynamic child therapy for problematic Hispanic boys.

    José Szapocznik;Arturo Rio;Edward Murray;Raquel Cohen

  • Directionality of change in youth anxiety treatment involving parents: an initial examination.

    Wendy K. Silverman;William M. Kurtines;James Jaccard;Armando A. Pina

  • Family Effectiveness Training: An Intervention to Prevent Drug Abuse and Problem Behaviors in Hispanic Adolescents

    Jose Szapocznik;David Santisteban;David Santisteban;Arturo Rio;Arturo Rio;Angel Perez-Vidal;Angel Perez-Vidal

  • Conjoint versus one-person family therapy: some evidence for the effectiveness of conducting family therapy through one person.

    José Szapocznik;William M. Kurtines;Franklin H. Foote;Angel Perez-Vidal

  • Breakthroughs in Family Therapy With Drug Abusing and Problem Youth

    José Szapocznik;William M. Kurtines

  • Bicultural Effectiveness Training (BET): An Experimental Test of an Intervention Modality for Families Experiencing Intergenerational/Intercultural Conflict:

    Jose Szapocznik;Arturo Rio;Angel Perez-Vidal;William Kurtines

  • Conjoint versus one-person family therapy: further evidence for the effectiveness of conducting family therapy through one person with drug-abusing adolescents.

    José Szapocznik;William M. Kurtines;Franklin Foote;Angel Perez-Vidal

  • The Development and Validation of a Measure of Identity Distress

    Steven L. Berman;Marilyn J. Montgomery;William M. Kurtines

  • Bicultural Effectiveness Training: A Treatment Intervention for Enhancing Intercultural Adjustment in Cuban American Families

    Jose Szapocznik;David Santisteban;William Kurtines;Angel Perez-Vidal

  • Moral Development: An Introduction

    William M. Kurtines;Jacob L. Gewirtz

  • Engaging adolescent drug abusers and their families in treatment: A strategic structural systems approach

    José Szapocznik;Angel Perez-Vidai;Angel Perez-Vidai;Andrew L. Brickman;Andrew L. Brickman;Franklin H. Foote;Franklin H. Foote

Frequent Co-Authors

José Szapocznik
José Szapocznik University of Miami
Wendy K. Silverman
Wendy K. Silverman Yale University
Carl F. Weems
Carl F. Weems Iowa State University
J. Douglas Coatsworth
J. Douglas Coatsworth University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Alan Meca
Alan Meca The University of Texas at San Antonio
James Jaccard
James Jaccard New York University
Seth J. Schwartz
Seth J. Schwartz The University of Texas at Austin
Golda S. Ginsburg
Golda S. Ginsburg University of Connecticut
Hilda Pantin
Hilda Pantin University of Miami
Armando Pina
Armando Pina Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Many students who study psychology in the USA go on to pursue online degrees and diverse career paths in mental health fields. Becoming a licensed therapist or counselor typically requires a graduate degree in counseling or psychology, and each location has unique education and licensure standards.

For example, the licensed therapist requirements in Tulsa focus on accredited graduate programs and internship hours. Similarly, the Virginia Beach licensed therapist education requirements emphasize specific coursework and supervised experience.

If you plan to work in the capital, it is important to know the Washington DC licensed therapist education requirements, which include both academic credentials and state exams. Meanwhile, the Wichita licensed therapist requirements highlight their own set of standards for licensure and continuing education.

Choosing an online program that aligns with your location’s licensing criteria is essential for a successful career. Always check your state or city’s guidelines to ensure your education meets the necessary requirements before you enroll.

Best Scientists Citing William M. Kurtines

Recently Published Articles