World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
8909
World Ranking
5756
National Ranking
2093

R. John Wilson publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. John Wilson sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 267 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

R. John Wilson D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where R. John Wilson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

R. John Wilson is a researcher affiliated with the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory in the United States. Their scholarly contributions primarily focus on planetary science and exploration, with an emphasis on the physics and astronomy of planetary atmospheres and surface processes.

Their publication record includes work in several fields and subfields such as Physics and Astronomy; Astronomy and Astrophysics; Physiology; Global and Planetary Change; Oceanography; and Earth-Surface Processes. Their research topics cover Planetary Science and Exploration, Astro and Planetary Science, Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life, Spaceflight effects on biology, Atmospheric aerosols and clouds, Marine and environmental studies, and Aeolian processes and effects.

Wilson has published articles in various scientific journals and conference proceedings. The most frequent venues include Icarus, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Journal of Geophysical Research Planets, Abstracts with Programs - Geological Society of America, and The Astrophysical Journal. Among these, Icarus stands out as the primary outlet with nine publications.

Their recent papers demonstrate a focus on Mars atmospheric dynamics and dust storm phenomena:

  • Baroclinic waves in the northern hemisphere of Mars as observed by the MRO Mars Climate Sounder and the MGS Thermal Emission Spectrometer, 2020, Icarus
  • An Investigation of the Encirclement of Mars by Dust in the 2018 Global Dust Storm Using EMARS, 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
  • The NASA Ames legacy Mars global climate model: Radiation code error correction and new baseline water cycle simulation, 2023, Icarus
  • Impact of the coagulation of dust particles on Mars during the 2018 global dust storm, 2022, Icarus
  • Modeling the "B" regional dust storm on Mars: Dust lofting mechanisms predicted by the new NASA Ames Mars GCM, 2023, Icarus

Wilson collaborates frequently with a group of other researchers, including M. A. Kahre, D. P. Hinson, Tanguy Bertrand, R. A. Urata, and A. Kling. These collaborations suggest a sustained engagement with studies on atmospheric processes and planetary climate modeling.

Best Publications

  • The dynamical core, physical parameterizations, and basic simulation characteristics of the atmospheric component AM3 of the GFDL global coupled model CM3

    Leo J. Donner;Bruce L. Wyman;Richard S. Hemler;Larry W. Horowitz

  • The new GFDL global atmosphere and land model AM2-LM2: Evaluation with prescribed SST simulations

    Jeffrey L. Anderson;V. B Alaji;Anthony J. Broccoli;Anthony J. Broccoli;William F. C Ooke

  • An intercomparison of ground-based millimeter, MGS TES, and Viking atmospheric temperature measurements: Seasonal and interannual variability of temperatures and dust loading in the global Mars atmosphere

    R. T. Clancy;B. J. Sandor;M. J. Wolff;Philip Christensen

  • Eight-year climatology of dust optical depth on Mars

    L. Montabone;L. Montabone;L. Montabone;F. Forget;E. Millour;R. J. Wilson

  • Comprehensive Model Simulation of Thermal Tides in the Martian Atmosphere

    R. J. Wilson;K. Hamilton

  • On the variability of ENSO over the past six centuries

    Rosanne D'Arrigo;Edward R. Cook;Rob J. Wilson;Rob Allan

  • Investigation of the nature and stability of the Martian seasonal water cycle with a general circulation model

    Mark I. Richardson;R. John Wilson

  • On the orbital forcing of Martian water and CO2 cycles: A general circulation model study with simplified volatile schemes

    Michael A. Mischna;Mark I. Richardson;R. John Wilson;Daniel J. McCleese

  • The GCM–Reality Intercomparison Project for SPARC (GRIPS): Scientific Issues and Initial Results

    Steven Pawson;Steven Pawson;Steven Pawson;K. Kodera;K. Hamilton;T. G. Shepherd

  • Simulation of the Martian dust cycle with the GFDL Mars GCM

    Shabari Basu;Mark I. Richardson;R. John Wilson

  • Climatology of the SKYHI Troposphere–Stratosphere–Mesosphere General Circulation Model

    Kevin Hamilton;R. John Wilson;J. D. Mahlman;L. J. Umscheid

  • A general circulation model simulation of the Martian polar warming

    R. John Wilson

  • A topographically forced asymmetry in the martian circulation and climate

    Mark I. Richardson;R. John Wilson

  • Middle Atmosphere Simulated with High Vertical and Horizontal Resolution Versions of a GCM: Improvements in the Cold Pole Bias and Generation of a QBO-like Oscillation in the Tropics

    Kevin Hamilton;R. John Wilson;Richard S. Hemler

  • Evidence for nonmigrating thermal tides in the Mars upper atmosphere from the Mars Global Surveyor Accelerometer Experiment

    R. John Wilson

  • Temperature inversions, thermal tides, and water ice clouds in the Martian tropics

    D. P. Hinson;R. J. Wilson

  • The Mars Dust Cycle

    Melinda A. Kahre;James R. Murphy;Claire E. Newman;R. John Wilson

  • A survey of Martian dust devil activity using Mars Global Surveyor Mars Orbiter Camera images

    Jenny A. Fisher;Mark I. Richardson;Claire E. Newman;Mark A. Szwast

  • Diurnal variation and radiative influence of Martian water ice clouds

    R. John Wilson;Gregory A. Neumann;Michael D. Smith

  • The Martian Atmosphere During the Viking Mission, I Infrared Measurements of Atmospheric Temperatures Revisited

    R.John Wilson;Mark I. Richardson

  • Water ice clouds in the Martian atmosphere: General circulation model experiments with a simple cloud scheme

    Mark I. Richardson;R. John Wilson;Alexander V. Rodin

  • Traveling waves in the martian atmosphere from MGS TES Nadir data

    D. Banfield;B.J. Conrath;P.J. Gierasch;R.John Wilson

  • Ensemble simulations of the decline and recovery of stratospheric ozone

    John Austin;R. John Wilson

  • Forced waves in the martian atmosphere from MGS TES nadir data

    D. Banfield;B. J. Conrath;M. D. Smith;Philip Christensen

  • Cyclones, tides, and the origin of a cross-equatorial dust storm on Mars

    Huiqun Wang;Mark I. Richardson;R. John Wilson;Andrew P. Ingersoll

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark I. Richardson
Mark I. Richardson California Institute of Technology
Stephen R. Lewis
Stephen R. Lewis The Open University
David M. Kass
David M. Kass California Institute of Technology
John Austin
John Austin Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory
Eugenia Kalnay
Eugenia Kalnay University of Maryland, College Park
Kevin Hamilton
Kevin Hamilton University of Hawaii at Manoa
Armin Kleinböhl
Armin Kleinböhl California Institute of Technology
Don Banfield
Don Banfield Cornell University
Ross N. Hoffman
Ross N. Hoffman University of Maryland, College Park
Barney J. Conrath
Barney J. Conrath Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Environmental Sciences often involves exploring related degrees and pathways that complement your skills and knowledge. For educators looking to advance their expertise, online doctoral programs such as edd no dissertation offer flexible options without the added pressure of dissertation work. This can be particularly appealing for professionals balancing work and study.

If you are interested in transitioning from a master's to a doctoral degree, some of the best eds to edd programs provide seamless online pathways designed to enhance leadership and research skills in education and environmental policy contexts.

For those focused on social work within environmental communities, finding affordable options is key. Programs highlighted among the cheapest online dsw programs make it feasible to gain advanced qualifications while minimizing debt.

Additionally, many students opt for a broad foundation with an accredited affordable online general studies degree. This flexible degree can be a strategic starting point, allowing learners to tailor their studies toward environmental sciences and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing R. John Wilson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles