World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 34 10295 9637 586 572 137 3728

John Farhall publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John Farhall between 1996 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John Farhall published across 29 years, from 1996 to 2024, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2018. 7 of the 144 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2018. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 5 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 6 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 3 publications
1996 2024

144 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John Farhall: publications per year, 1996 to 2024
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 1
1998 4
1999 1
2000 5
2001 7
2002 1
2003 4
2004 1
2005 6
2006 2
2007 8
2008 2
2009 5
2010 3
2011 7
2012 6
2013 7
2014 6
2015 7
2016 3
2017 6
2018 11
2019 11
2020 9
2021 7
2022 6
2023 4
2024 3
Total 144
Download as CSV

John Farhall publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Farhall sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 137 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 137
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

John Farhall D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Farhall sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 34
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

John Farhall is affiliated with La Trobe University in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on mental health, with a significant emphasis on schizophrenia and digital interventions for psychiatric care.

The main fields of study covered in their work include Psychology, Medicine, and Health Professions. Within these fields, subfields of study include General Health Professions, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Key topics explored in their research are:

  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Schizophrenia Research and Treatment
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Psychiatric Care and Mental Health Services

Farhall has contributed to multiple recent publications, including:

  • The EMPOWER blended digital intervention for relapse prevention in schizophrenia: a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial in Scotland and Australia (2022) in The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Early Signs Monitoring to Prevent Relapse in Psychosis and Promote Well-Being, Engagement, and Recovery: Protocol for a Feasibility Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial Harnessing Mobile Phone Technology Blended With Peer Support (2020) in JMIR Research Protocols
  • Engagement with online psychosocial interventions for psychosis: A review and synthesis of relevant factors (2021) in Internet Interventions
  • Digital smartphone intervention to recognise and manage early warning signs in schizophrenia to prevent relapse: the EMPOWER feasibility cluster RCT (2022) in Health Technology Assessment
  • Impact of Jointly Using an e-Mental Health Resource (Self-Management And Recovery Technology) on Interactions Between Service Users Experiencing Severe Mental Illness and Community Mental Health Workers: Grounded Theory Study (2021) in JMIR Mental Health

The following publication venues frequently feature Farhall's work:

  • Psychosis
  • JMIR Research Protocols
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
  • The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Internet Interventions

Frequent collaborators in Farhall's research include:

  • Andrew Gumley
  • John Gleeson
  • Simon Bradstreet
  • Stephanie Allan
  • Hamish J. McLeod

Best Publications

  • Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of schizophrenia and related disorders

    P. McGorry;E. Killackey;T. Lambert;M. Lambert

  • The voices acceptance and action scale (VAAS): Pilot data.

    Frances Shawyer;Kirk Ratcliff;Andrew James Mackinnon;John Farhall

  • A randomised controlled trial of acceptance-based cognitive behavioural therapy for command hallucinations in psychotic disorders.

    Frances Shawyer;John Farhall;Andrew J Mackinnon;Tom Trauer;Tom Trauer;Tom Trauer

  • Quality of Life and Social Isolation Among Caregivers of Adults with Schizophrenia: Policy and Outcomes

    Laura Hayes;Graeme Hawthorne;John Farhall;Brendan O’Hanlon

  • Coping with hallucinated voices in schizophrenia: a review of self-initiated strategies and therapeutic interventions.

    John Farhall;Kenneth Mark Greenwood;Kenneth Mark Greenwood;Henry J. Jackson

  • Coping with hallucinations: Exploring stress and coping framework

    John Farhall;Megan Gehrke

  • Acceptance and commitment therapy for psychosis: randomised controlled trial.

    Frances Shawyer;John Farhall;John Farhall;Neil Thomas;Neil Thomas;Steven C. Hayes

  • Life hassles, experiential avoidance and distressing delusional experiences.

    Eliot Goldstone;John Farhall;Ben Ong

  • Command Hallucinations and Violence: Implications for Detention and Treatment

    Frances Shawyer;Andrew J Mackinnon;John Farhall;Tom Trauer

  • The Active Therapeutic Processes of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Persistent Symptoms of Psychosis: Clients’ Perspectives

    Tory Bacon;John Farhall;Eleanor Fossey

  • The EMPOWER blended digital intervention for relapse prevention in schizophrenia: a feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial in Scotland and Australia.

    Unknown

  • Pilot randomised controlled trial of a brief coping-focused intervention for hearing voices blended with smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment and intervention (SAVVy): Feasibility, acceptability and preliminary clinical outcomes.

    Imogen H Bell;Susan L Rossell;John Farhall;Mark Hayward

  • Beliefs about Voices and Schemas about Self and Others in Psychosis

    Neil Arthur Thomas;John Farhall;Frances Shawyer

  • Auditory hallucinations: a review of assessment tools

    Kirk Ratcliff;John Farhall;Frances Shawyer

  • From long-stay psychiatric hospital to Community Care Unit: evaluation at 1 year

    Tom Trauer;John Farhall;Richard Newton;Peter Cheung

  • Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Auditory Hallucinations: Effectiveness and Predictors of Outcome in a Specialist Clinic

    Neil Thomas;Susan Rossell;John Farhall;Frances Shawyer

  • Recovery After Psychosis: Qualitative Study of Service User Experiences of Lived Experience Videos on a Recovery-Oriented Website.

    Anne Williams;Ellie Fossey;John Farhall;Fiona Foley

  • Neurocognition as a predictor of transition to psychotic disorder and functional outcomes in ultra-high risk participants: Findings from the NEURAPRO randomized clinical trial.

    Luke K. Bolt;G. Paul Amminger;G. Paul Amminger;John Farhall;Patrick D. McGorry

  • Promoting Personal Recovery in People with Persisting Psychotic Disorders: Development and Pilot Study of a Novel Digital Intervention.

    Neil Thomas;John Farhall;Fiona Foley;Nuwan Dominic Leitan

  • Acting on harmful command hallucinations in psychotic disorders: an integrative approach

    Frances Shawyer;Andrew Mackinnon;John Farhall;Eliza Sims

  • Predicting engagement with an online psychosocial intervention for psychosis: Exploring individual- and intervention-level predictors.

    Chelsea Arnold;Kristi-Ann Villagonzalo;Denny Meyer;John Farhall

  • An effectiveness trial of cognitive behaviour therapy in a representative sample of outpatients with psychosis

    John Frederick. Farhall;Nerelie. Freeman;Frances Anne. Shawyer;Frances Anne. Shawyer;T. Trauer

Frequent Co-Authors

Neil Thomas
Neil Thomas Swinburne University of Technology
Susan L. Rossell
Susan L. Rossell Swinburne University of Technology
David J. Castle
David J. Castle University of Tasmania
Kelly Allott
Kelly Allott University of Melbourne
Andrew Mackinnon
Andrew Mackinnon University of New South Wales
Mark Hayward
Mark Hayward University of Sussex
Andrew Gumley
Andrew Gumley University of Glasgow
John Gleeson
John Gleeson Australian Catholic University
Michael Kyrios
Michael Kyrios Flinders University
Steven C. Hayes
Steven C. Hayes University of Nevada Reno

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens up diverse pathways, especially with online degree options. Many students pursue advanced studies to become counselors or therapists, which usually involves specific educational and licensure requirements that vary by state and specialization.

For example, those interested in working with couples or families may want to review Winston Salem mft education requirements to understand the steps to becoming a marriage and family therapist. If your goal is to become a licensed counselor, reviewing local guidelines is crucial. You can learn about the process by reading about becoming a licensed therapist in Albuquerque, which provides insights into common degree expectations, coursework, and supervised practice.

Requirements may differ in other states and cities. For instance, consider checking Anaheim licensed therapist education requirements or the licensed therapist requirements in Anchorage. These resources can help you identify the best educational pathway and online program to match your career goals in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing John Farhall

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles