World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
61
Citations
14569
World Ranking
2764
National Ranking
215

Andrew Smith publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Smith sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 254 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Andrew Smith D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Smith sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew Smith is affiliated with the British Antarctic Survey in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science, with particular expertise in various subfields including Atmospheric Science, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Geophysics, and Ecology.

Their work emphasizes several main topics:

  • Cryospheric studies and observations
  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Winter Sports Injuries and Performance
  • Seismic Waves and Analysis
  • Polar Research and Ecology
  • Climate change and permafrost
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management

Andrew Smith has contributed to research published in numerous academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Earth Surface
  • Annals of Glaciology
  • The Cryosphere
  • Water Resources Research
  • Earth system science data

Collaborations have been a significant aspect of their research, with frequent co-authors such as:

  • Alex Brisbourne
  • Thomas Hudson
  • J. M. Kendall
  • Sofia-Katerina Kufner
  • Tavi Murray

Recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Andrew Smith include:

  • "Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) for Natural Microseismicity Studies: A Case Study From Antarctica," 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • "Toward Global Stochastic River Flood Modeling," 2020, Water Resources Research
  • "Ice stream subglacial access for ice-sheet history and fast ice flow: the BEAMISH Project on Rutford Ice Stream, West Antarctica and initial results on basal conditions," 2020, Annals of Glaciology
  • "Antarctic Bedmap data: Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable (FAIR) sharing of 60 years of ice bed, surface, and thickness data," 2023, Earth system science data
  • "A 30 m Global Flood Inundation Model for Any Climate Scenario," 2024, Water Resources Research

Best Publications

  • Bedmap2: improved ice bed, surface and thickness datasets for Antarctica

    Peter Fretwell;Hamish D. Pritchard;David G. Vaughan;J. L. Bamber

  • Law Dome CO2, CH4 and N2O ice core records extended to 2000 years BP

    C. MacFarling Meure;D. Etheridge;C. Trudinger;P. Steele

  • A high‐resolution global flood hazard model

    Christopher C. Sampson;Andrew M. Smith;Paul D. Bates;Jeffrey C. Neal

  • Estimates of present and future flood risk in the conterminous United States

    Oliver E J Wing;Paul D Bates;Andrew M Smith;Christopher C Sampson

  • The ANTARES AMS facility at ANSTO

    D. Fink;M. Hotchkis;Q. Hua;G. Jacobsen

  • Progress In Radiocarbon Target Preparation At The Antares Ams Centre

    Q Hua;G E Jacobsen;U Zoppi;E M Lawson

  • Validation of a 30 m resolution flood hazard model of the conterminous United States

    Oliver E. J. Wing;Paul D. Bates;Christopher C. Sampson;Andrew M. Smith

  • The Geostationary Earth Radiation Budget Project

    J. E. Harries;J. E. Russell;J. A. Hanafin;H. Brindley

  • Preindustrial 14CH4 indicates greater anthropogenic fossil CH4 emissions.

    Benjamin Hmiel;V. V. Petrenko;M. N. Dyonisius;C. Buizert

  • The World's Smallest Gas Cylinders?

    G. E. Gadd;M. Blackford;S. Moricca;N. Webb

  • The credibility challenge for global fluvial flood risk analysis

    Mark Trigg;Cathryn Birch;Jeffrey Neal;Paul Bates

  • Rapid erosion, drumlin formation, and changing hydrology beneath an Antarctic ice stream

    A.M. Smith;T. Murray;K.W. Nicholls;K. Makinson

  • How Much, How Fast?: A Science Review and Outlook for Research on the Instability of Antarctica's Thwaites Glacier in the 21st Century

    Ted A. Scambos;Robin E. Bell;Richard B. Alley;S. Anandakrishnan

  • Massive perturbation in terrestrial ecosystems of the Eastern Mediterranean region associated with the 8.2 kyr B.P. climatic event

    Joerg Pross;Ulrich Kotthoff;Ulrich Müller;Odile Peyron

  • Glacier surge propagation by thermal evolution at the bed

    Tavi Murray;Graham W. Stuart;Paul J. Miller;John Woodward

  • Regional flood frequency analysis at the global scale

    Andrew Smith;Christopher Sampson;Paul Bates

  • Sample processing for earth science studies at ANTARES

    D Child;G Elliott;C Mifsud;A.M Smith

  • Fossil organic carbon in wastewater and its fate in treatment plants

    Yingyu Law;Geraldine E. Jacobsen;Andrew M. Smith;Zhiguo Yuan

  • Minimal geological methane emissions during the Younger Dryas–Preboreal abrupt warming event

    Vasilii V. Petrenko;Andrew M. Smith;Hinrich Schaefer;Katja Riedel

  • Measurement of 236U in environmental media

    M.A.C Hotchkis;D Child;D Fink;G.E Jacobsen

Frequent Co-Authors

Edward C. King
Edward C. King British Antarctic Survey
David G. Vaughan
David G. Vaughan British Antarctic Survey
Quan Hua
Quan Hua Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation
David Fink
David Fink Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation
Geraldine Jacobsen
Geraldine Jacobsen Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation
Mark A. J. Curran
Mark A. J. Curran University of Tasmania
Neil Ross
Neil Ross Newcastle University
Martin J. Siegert
Martin J. Siegert University of Exeter
Alan H.B. Wu
Alan H.B. Wu University of California, San Francisco
Tavi Murray
Tavi Murray Swansea University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many students seek affordable education options, making programs like the cheapest online DSW programs appealing for those combining social work with environmental justice and community advocacy.

Broadening one’s knowledge base with a flexible curriculum is also possible through a cheap online general studies degree. This pathway supports interdisciplinary learning, which is valuable in addressing complex environmental issues.

For students prioritizing ease and accessibility, some may consider an easy bachelor's degree to balance studies with work or other commitments, though it’s crucial to maintain a curriculum that supports your career goals in environmental science.

Specialized fields like geology play a critical role in environmental sciences. Pursuing a geology degree online offers practical knowledge useful in resource management, conservation, and natural hazard assessment.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles