World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
55
Citations
10851
World Ranking
2042
National Ranking
149

John Gleeson publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Gleeson sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 218 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

John Gleeson D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Gleeson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The "online brain": how the Internet may be changing our cognition

    Joseph Firth;John B Torous;Brendon Stubbs;Josh A Firth

  • Risk factors for relapse following treatment for first episode psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.

    Mario Alvarez-Jimenez;A. Priede;Sarah Hetrick;Sarah Bendall

  • Loneliness over time: the crucial role of social anxiety

    Michelle H. Lim;Thomas L. Rodebaugh;Michael J. Zyphur;John Francis Martin Gleeson

  • Online, social media and mobile technologies for psychosis treatment: a systematic review on novel user-led interventions

    Mario Alvarez-Jimenez;M. A. Alcazar-Corcoles;Cesar Gonzalez-Blanch;Sarah Bendall

  • Non-pharmacological management of antipsychotic-induced weight gain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

    Mario Álvarez-Jiménez;Sarah E. Hetrick;César González-Blanch;John F. Gleeson

  • Preventing the Second Episode: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Psychosocial and Pharmacological Trials in First-Episode psychosis

    Mario Alvarez-Jimenez;Alexandra Parker;Sarah Hetrick;Patrick McGorry

  • Predictors of functional recovery in first-episode psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.

    Olga Santesteban-Echarri;Mercedes Paino;Simon Rice;César González-Blanch

  • Road to full recovery: Longitudinal relationship between symptomatic remission and psychosocial recovery in first-episode psychosis over 7.5 years

    M Álvarez-Jiménez;JF Gleeson;LP Henry;SM Harrigan

  • On the HORYZON: Moderated online social therapy for long-term recovery in first episode psychosis

    Mario Alvarez-Jimenez;Sarah Bendall;Reeva Lederman;Greg Wadley

  • The wisdom to know the difference: Strategy-situation fit in Emotion regulation in daily life is associated with well-being.

    Simon Haines;John Gleeson;Peter Kuppens;Tom Hollenstein

  • Loneliness in psychosis: a systematic review

    Michelle H. Lim;John F. M. Gleeson;Mario Alvarez-Jimenez;David L. Penn;David L. Penn

  • Online and Social Networking Interventions for the Treatment of Depression in Young People: A Systematic Review

    Simon Rice;Joanne Goodall;Sarah Hetrick;Alexandra Parker

  • Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Online Social Therapy for Youth Mental Health.

    Simon D'Alfonso;Olga Santesteban-Echarri;Olga Santesteban-Echarri;Simon Rice;Greg Wadley

  • Exciting career opportunity beckons! Early intervention and vocational rehabilitation in first‐episode psychosis: employing cautious optimism

    Eoin J. Killackey;Henry J. Jackson;John Gleeson;Ian B. Hickie

  • Acute-phase and 1-year follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial of CBT versus Befriending for first-episode psychosis : the ACE project

    Henry Jackson;Patrick McGorry;Eoin Killackey;Sarah Bendall

  • Moderated online social therapy: Designing and evaluating technology for mental health

    Reeva Lederman;Greg Wadley;John Gleeson;Sarah Bendall

  • Cyberbullying in social networking sites

    Rebecca Dredge;John Gleeson;Xochitl de la Piedad Garcia

  • Risk Factors Associated with Impact Severity of Cyberbullying Victimization: A Qualitative Study of Adolescent Online Social Networking

    Rebecca Dredge;John F. M. Gleeson;Xochitl de la Piedad Garcia

  • A randomized controlled trial of relapse prevention therapy for first-episode psychosis patients.

    John F. M. Gleeson;Sue M. Cotton;Mario Alvarez-Jimenez;Darryl Wade

  • Acceptance- and mindfulness-based interventions for persons with psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Jens Einar Jansen;John Gleeson;Sarah Bendall;Simon Rice

Frequent Co-Authors

Mario Alvarez-Jimenez
Mario Alvarez-Jimenez University of Melbourne
Patrick D. McGorry
Patrick D. McGorry University of Melbourne
Simon M Rice
Simon M Rice University of Melbourne
Peter Koval
Peter Koval University of Melbourne
Henry J. Jackson
Henry J. Jackson University of Melbourne
David L. Penn
David L. Penn University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Andrew M. Chanen
Andrew M. Chanen University of Melbourne
Helen Herrman
Helen Herrman University of Melbourne
Michael Berk
Michael Berk Deakin University
Andrew Mackinnon
Andrew Mackinnon University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing John Gleeson

Recently Published Articles