World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 55 2042 1853 149 140 218 10851

John Gleeson publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John Gleeson between 1997 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John Gleeson published across 30 years, from 1997 to 2026, averaging 8.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2023. 18 of the 261 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2023. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 6 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 9 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 17 publications 2026: 1 publication
1997 2026

261 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John Gleeson: publications per year, 1997 to 2026
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 0
2003 1
2004 6
2005 7
2006 6
2007 1
2008 9
2009 9
2010 7
2011 9
2012 15
2013 11
2014 14
2015 9
2016 9
2017 8
2018 14
2019 16
2020 19
2021 22
2022 11
2023 24
2024 14
2025 17
2026 1
Total 261
Download as CSV

John Gleeson publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Gleeson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 214–223 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 218 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246 218
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

John Gleeson D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Gleeson sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137 55
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Best Publications

  • The "online brain": how the Internet may be changing our cognition

    Joseph Firth;John B Torous;Brendon Stubbs;Josh A Firth

  • Risk factors for relapse following treatment for first episode psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.

    Mario Alvarez-Jimenez;A. Priede;Sarah Hetrick;Sarah Bendall

  • Loneliness over time: the crucial role of social anxiety

    Michelle H. Lim;Thomas L. Rodebaugh;Michael J. Zyphur;John Francis Martin Gleeson

  • Online, social media and mobile technologies for psychosis treatment: a systematic review on novel user-led interventions

    Mario Alvarez-Jimenez;M. A. Alcazar-Corcoles;Cesar Gonzalez-Blanch;Sarah Bendall

  • Non-pharmacological management of antipsychotic-induced weight gain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

    Mario Álvarez-Jiménez;Sarah E. Hetrick;César González-Blanch;John F. Gleeson

  • Preventing the Second Episode: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Psychosocial and Pharmacological Trials in First-Episode psychosis

    Mario Alvarez-Jimenez;Alexandra Parker;Sarah Hetrick;Patrick McGorry

  • Predictors of functional recovery in first-episode psychosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.

    Olga Santesteban-Echarri;Mercedes Paino;Simon Rice;César González-Blanch

  • Road to full recovery: Longitudinal relationship between symptomatic remission and psychosocial recovery in first-episode psychosis over 7.5 years

    M Álvarez-Jiménez;JF Gleeson;LP Henry;SM Harrigan

  • On the HORYZON: Moderated online social therapy for long-term recovery in first episode psychosis

    Mario Alvarez-Jimenez;Sarah Bendall;Reeva Lederman;Greg Wadley

  • The wisdom to know the difference: Strategy-situation fit in Emotion regulation in daily life is associated with well-being.

    Simon Haines;John Gleeson;Peter Kuppens;Tom Hollenstein

  • Loneliness in psychosis: a systematic review

    Michelle H. Lim;John F. M. Gleeson;Mario Alvarez-Jimenez;David L. Penn;David L. Penn

  • Online and Social Networking Interventions for the Treatment of Depression in Young People: A Systematic Review

    Simon Rice;Joanne Goodall;Sarah Hetrick;Alexandra Parker

  • Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Online Social Therapy for Youth Mental Health.

    Simon D'Alfonso;Olga Santesteban-Echarri;Olga Santesteban-Echarri;Simon Rice;Greg Wadley

  • Exciting career opportunity beckons! Early intervention and vocational rehabilitation in first‐episode psychosis: employing cautious optimism

    Eoin J. Killackey;Henry J. Jackson;John Gleeson;Ian B. Hickie

  • Acute-phase and 1-year follow-up results of a randomized controlled trial of CBT versus Befriending for first-episode psychosis : the ACE project

    Henry Jackson;Patrick McGorry;Eoin Killackey;Sarah Bendall

  • Moderated online social therapy: Designing and evaluating technology for mental health

    Reeva Lederman;Greg Wadley;John Gleeson;Sarah Bendall

  • Cyberbullying in social networking sites

    Rebecca Dredge;John Gleeson;Xochitl de la Piedad Garcia

  • Risk Factors Associated with Impact Severity of Cyberbullying Victimization: A Qualitative Study of Adolescent Online Social Networking

    Rebecca Dredge;John F. M. Gleeson;Xochitl de la Piedad Garcia

  • A randomized controlled trial of relapse prevention therapy for first-episode psychosis patients.

    John F. M. Gleeson;Sue M. Cotton;Mario Alvarez-Jimenez;Darryl Wade

Frequent Co-Authors

Mario Alvarez-Jimenez
Mario Alvarez-Jimenez University of Melbourne
Patrick D. McGorry
Patrick D. McGorry University of Melbourne
Simon M Rice
Simon M Rice University of Melbourne
Peter Koval
Peter Koval University of Melbourne
Henry J. Jackson
Henry J. Jackson University of Melbourne
David L. Penn
David L. Penn University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Andrew M. Chanen
Andrew M. Chanen University of Melbourne
Helen Herrman
Helen Herrman University of Melbourne
Michael Berk
Michael Berk Deakin University
Andrew Mackinnon
Andrew Mackinnon University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing John Gleeson

Recently Published Articles