World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
4317
World Ranking
10589
National Ranking
608

Fiona Shand publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fiona Shand sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 112 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Fiona Shand D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fiona Shand sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Fiona Shand is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. Their research focuses primarily on psychology and health professions, with a particular emphasis on clinical psychology and general health professions. The subfields of study that characterize their work include clinical psychology, general health professions, social psychology, applied psychology, and sociology and political science.

The main topics covered by Fiona Shand's research include suicide and self-harm studies, mental health treatment and access, digital mental health interventions, mental health and patient involvement, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, health policy implementation science, and maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum.

Recent publications by Fiona Shand include the following:

  • A randomised controlled trial of a relationship-focussed mobile phone application for improving adolescents' mental health (2020) in the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • The Lancet Commission on self-harm (2024) in The Lancet
  • Drafting the Aboriginal and Islander Mental Health Initiative for Youth (AIMhi-Y) App: Results of a formative mixed methods study (2020) in Internet Interventions
  • Protocol for a stepped-wedge, cluster randomized controlled trial of the LifeSpan suicide prevention trial in four communities in New South Wales, Australia (2020) in Trials
  • Workplace stress, common mental disorder and suicidal ideation in junior doctors (2020) in Internal Medicine Journal

Fiona Shand has collaborated frequently with the following co-authors:

  • Michelle Torok
  • Philip J. Batterham
  • Lauren McGillivray
  • Alison L. Calear
  • Demee Rheinberger

The primary publication venues where Fiona Shand has contributed multiple works include:

  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • JMIR Mental Health
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • Archives of Suicide Research
  • Trials

Best Publications

  • Road to resilience: a systematic review and meta-analysis of resilience training programmes and interventions.

    Sadhbh Joyce;Fiona Shand;Joseph Tighe;Steven J Laurent

  • Ibobbly mobile health intervention for suicide prevention in Australian Indigenous youth: a pilot randomised controlled trial

    Joseph Tighe;Fiona Shand;Rebecca Ridani;Andrew Mackinnon

  • Evidence of CNIH3 involvement in opioid dependence

    Elliot C. Nelson;Arpana Agrawal;Andrew C. Heath;Ryan Bogdan

  • Sex differences amongst dependent heroin users: histories, clinical characteristics and predictors of other substance dependence.

    Fiona L. Shand;Louisa Degenhardt;Tim Slade;Elliot C. Nelson

  • What Interrupts Suicide Attempts in Men: A Qualitative Study.

    Michael J. Player;Judy Proudfoot;Andrea S. Fogarty;Erin Whittle

  • Best strategies for reducing the suicide rate in Australia

    Karolina Krysinska;Philip J Batterham;Michelle Tye;Fiona Shand

  • A Systematic Review of Mass Media Campaigns for Suicide Prevention: Understanding Their Efficacy and the Mechanisms Needed for Successful Behavioral and Literacy Change

    Michelle Torok;Alison Calear;Fiona Shand;Helen Christensen

  • Association of OPRD1 polymorphisms with heroin dependence in a large case-control series

    Elliot C. Nelson;Michael T. Lynskey;Andrew C. Heath;Naomi Wray

  • The effectiveness of a suicide prevention app for indigenous Australian youths: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

    Fiona L Shand;Rebecca Ridani;Joe Tighe;Helen Christensen

  • Acceptance and commitment therapy universal prevention program for adolescents: a feasibility study

    Rowan Burckhardt;Vijaya Manicavasagar;Philip J. Batterham;Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic

  • ANKK1, TTC12, and NCAM1 polymorphisms and heroin dependence: importance of considering drug exposure.

    Elliot C. Nelson;Michael T. Lynskey;Andrew C. Heath;Naomi Wray

  • Resilience@Work Mindfulness Program: Results From a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial With First Responders

    Sadhbh Joyce;Sadhbh Joyce;Fiona Shand;Tara J Lal;Brendan Mott

  • Usage and Acceptability of the iBobbly App: Pilot Trial for Suicide Prevention in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Youth.

    Joseph Tighe;Fiona Shand;Kathy McKay;Taylor Jai McAlister

  • Effectiveness of a Web-Based Self-Help Program for Suicidal Thinking in an Australian Community Sample: Randomized Controlled Trial

    Bregje A.J. Van Spijker;Aliza Werner-Seidler;Philip J. Batterham;Andrew Mackinnon

  • Persistence of preference for a flavor presented in simultaneous compound with sucrose.

    Justin A. Harris;Fiona L. Shand;Louisa Q. Carroll;R. Frederick Westbrook

  • A randomised controlled trial of a relationship-focussed mobile phone application for improving adolescents' mental health.

    Bridianne O'Dea;Jin Han;Philip J Batterham;Melinda R Achilles

  • Mindfulness-Based Resilience Training in the Workplace: Pilot Study of the Internet-Based Resilience@Work (RAW) Mindfulness Program

    Sadhbh Joyce;Fiona Shand;Richard A Bryant;Tara J Lal

  • A Smartphone App for Adolescents With Sleep Disturbance: Development of the Sleep Ninja.

    Aliza Werner-Seidler;Bridianne O'Dea;Fiona Shand;Lara Johnston

  • Suicide prevention in Australian Aboriginal communities: a review of past and present programs

    Rebecca Ridani;Fiona L. Shand;Helen Christensen;Kathryn McKay

  • The effect of comorbid substance use disorders on treatment outcome for anxiety disorders.

    Peter M. McEvoy;Fiona Shand

  • A comparison of multi-component systems approaches to suicide prevention

    Simon T.E. Baker;Jennifer Nicholas;Fiona Shand;Rachel Green

  • The use of technology in Suicide Prevention

    Mark E. Larsen;Nicholas Cummins;Tjeerd W. Boonstra;Bridianne O'Dea

Frequent Co-Authors

Helen Christensen
Helen Christensen University of New South Wales
Michelle Torok
Michelle Torok Black Dog Institute
Philip J. Batterham
Philip J. Batterham Australian National University
Louisa Degenhardt
Louisa Degenhardt University of New South Wales
Alison L. Calear
Alison L. Calear Australian National University
Raimondo Bruno
Raimondo Bruno University of Tasmania
Wayne Hall
Wayne Hall University of Queensland
Andrew Mackinnon
Andrew Mackinnon University of New South Wales
Shane Darke
Shane Darke University of New South Wales
Nicholas Lintzeris
Nicholas Lintzeris University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA opens a variety of online learning and career options, particularly in fields like counseling and mental health. Substance abuse counseling is a popular direction for psychology graduates, with specific education and licensing requirements that vary by location.

For those interested in working with individuals facing addiction, understanding the Baltimore substance abuse counselors education requirements is essential. Each state has its own standards, as shown by the steps for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Boise or the distinct substance abuse counselor requirements in Boston.

Earning an online psychology degree can also provide a pathway to helping communities in various cities, such as becoming a substance abuse counselor in Buffalo. Online programs often offer flexible study options and specialized coursework to meet unique state criteria. This makes them an attractive choice for students seeking a rewarding career in mental health and counseling across the United States.

Best Scientists Citing Fiona Shand

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles