World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 33 10589 9912 608 593 112 4317

Fiona Shand publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Fiona Shand between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Fiona Shand published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2023. 25 of the 156 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2023. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 11 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 0 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 4 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 15 publications
2002 2025

156 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Fiona Shand: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 3
2004 1
2005 11
2006 1
2007 0
2008 1
2009 0
2010 1
2011 2
2012 1
2013 4
2014 7
2015 6
2016 8
2017 7
2018 11
2019 7
2020 11
2021 16
2022 13
2023 19
2024 10
2025 15
Total 156
Download as CSV

Fiona Shand publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fiona Shand sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 112 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 112
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Fiona Shand D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fiona Shand sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 33
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Fiona Shand is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. Their research focuses primarily on psychology and health professions, with a particular emphasis on clinical psychology and general health professions. The subfields of study that characterize their work include clinical psychology, general health professions, social psychology, applied psychology, and sociology and political science.

The main topics covered by Fiona Shand's research include suicide and self-harm studies, mental health treatment and access, digital mental health interventions, mental health and patient involvement, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, health policy implementation science, and maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum.

Recent publications by Fiona Shand include the following:

  • A randomised controlled trial of a relationship-focussed mobile phone application for improving adolescents' mental health (2020) in the Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • The Lancet Commission on self-harm (2024) in The Lancet
  • Drafting the Aboriginal and Islander Mental Health Initiative for Youth (AIMhi-Y) App: Results of a formative mixed methods study (2020) in Internet Interventions
  • Protocol for a stepped-wedge, cluster randomized controlled trial of the LifeSpan suicide prevention trial in four communities in New South Wales, Australia (2020) in Trials
  • Workplace stress, common mental disorder and suicidal ideation in junior doctors (2020) in Internal Medicine Journal

Fiona Shand has collaborated frequently with the following co-authors:

  • Michelle Torok
  • Philip J. Batterham
  • Lauren McGillivray
  • Alison L. Calear
  • Demee Rheinberger

The primary publication venues where Fiona Shand has contributed multiple works include:

  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • JMIR Mental Health
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • Archives of Suicide Research
  • Trials

Best Publications

  • Road to resilience: a systematic review and meta-analysis of resilience training programmes and interventions.

    Sadhbh Joyce;Fiona Shand;Joseph Tighe;Steven J Laurent

  • Ibobbly mobile health intervention for suicide prevention in Australian Indigenous youth: a pilot randomised controlled trial

    Joseph Tighe;Fiona Shand;Rebecca Ridani;Andrew Mackinnon

  • Evidence of CNIH3 involvement in opioid dependence

    Elliot C. Nelson;Arpana Agrawal;Andrew C. Heath;Ryan Bogdan

  • Sex differences amongst dependent heroin users: histories, clinical characteristics and predictors of other substance dependence.

    Fiona L. Shand;Louisa Degenhardt;Tim Slade;Elliot C. Nelson

  • What Interrupts Suicide Attempts in Men: A Qualitative Study.

    Michael J. Player;Judy Proudfoot;Andrea S. Fogarty;Erin Whittle

  • Best strategies for reducing the suicide rate in Australia

    Karolina Krysinska;Philip J Batterham;Michelle Tye;Fiona Shand

  • A Systematic Review of Mass Media Campaigns for Suicide Prevention: Understanding Their Efficacy and the Mechanisms Needed for Successful Behavioral and Literacy Change

    Michelle Torok;Alison Calear;Fiona Shand;Helen Christensen

  • Association of OPRD1 polymorphisms with heroin dependence in a large case-control series

    Elliot C. Nelson;Michael T. Lynskey;Andrew C. Heath;Naomi Wray

  • The effectiveness of a suicide prevention app for indigenous Australian youths: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

    Fiona L Shand;Rebecca Ridani;Joe Tighe;Helen Christensen

  • Acceptance and commitment therapy universal prevention program for adolescents: a feasibility study

    Rowan Burckhardt;Vijaya Manicavasagar;Philip J. Batterham;Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic

  • ANKK1, TTC12, and NCAM1 polymorphisms and heroin dependence: importance of considering drug exposure.

    Elliot C. Nelson;Michael T. Lynskey;Andrew C. Heath;Naomi Wray

  • Resilience@Work Mindfulness Program: Results From a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial With First Responders

    Sadhbh Joyce;Sadhbh Joyce;Fiona Shand;Tara J Lal;Brendan Mott

  • Usage and Acceptability of the iBobbly App: Pilot Trial for Suicide Prevention in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Youth.

    Joseph Tighe;Fiona Shand;Kathy McKay;Taylor Jai McAlister

  • Effectiveness of a Web-Based Self-Help Program for Suicidal Thinking in an Australian Community Sample: Randomized Controlled Trial

    Bregje A.J. Van Spijker;Aliza Werner-Seidler;Philip J. Batterham;Andrew Mackinnon

  • Persistence of preference for a flavor presented in simultaneous compound with sucrose.

    Justin A. Harris;Fiona L. Shand;Louisa Q. Carroll;R. Frederick Westbrook

  • A randomised controlled trial of a relationship-focussed mobile phone application for improving adolescents' mental health.

    Bridianne O'Dea;Jin Han;Philip J Batterham;Melinda R Achilles

  • Mindfulness-Based Resilience Training in the Workplace: Pilot Study of the Internet-Based Resilience@Work (RAW) Mindfulness Program

    Sadhbh Joyce;Fiona Shand;Richard A Bryant;Tara J Lal

  • A Smartphone App for Adolescents With Sleep Disturbance: Development of the Sleep Ninja.

    Aliza Werner-Seidler;Bridianne O'Dea;Fiona Shand;Lara Johnston

  • Suicide prevention in Australian Aboriginal communities: a review of past and present programs

    Rebecca Ridani;Fiona L. Shand;Helen Christensen;Kathryn McKay

  • The effect of comorbid substance use disorders on treatment outcome for anxiety disorders.

    Peter M. McEvoy;Fiona Shand

  • A comparison of multi-component systems approaches to suicide prevention

    Simon T.E. Baker;Jennifer Nicholas;Fiona Shand;Rachel Green

  • The use of technology in Suicide Prevention

    Mark E. Larsen;Nicholas Cummins;Tjeerd W. Boonstra;Bridianne O'Dea

Frequent Co-Authors

Helen Christensen
Helen Christensen University of New South Wales
Michelle Torok
Michelle Torok Black Dog Institute
Philip J. Batterham
Philip J. Batterham Australian National University
Louisa Degenhardt
Louisa Degenhardt University of New South Wales
Alison L. Calear
Alison L. Calear Australian National University
Raimondo Bruno
Raimondo Bruno University of Tasmania
Wayne Hall
Wayne Hall University of Queensland
Andrew Mackinnon
Andrew Mackinnon University of New South Wales
Shane Darke
Shane Darke University of New South Wales
Nicholas Lintzeris
Nicholas Lintzeris University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree in the USA opens a variety of online learning and career options, particularly in fields like counseling and mental health. Substance abuse counseling is a popular direction for psychology graduates, with specific education and licensing requirements that vary by location.

For those interested in working with individuals facing addiction, understanding the Baltimore substance abuse counselors education requirements is essential. Each state has its own standards, as shown by the steps for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Boise or the distinct substance abuse counselor requirements in Boston.

Earning an online psychology degree can also provide a pathway to helping communities in various cities, such as becoming a substance abuse counselor in Buffalo. Online programs often offer flexible study options and specialized coursework to meet unique state criteria. This makes them an attractive choice for students seeking a rewarding career in mental health and counseling across the United States.

Best Scientists Citing Fiona Shand

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles