World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8252 7705 486 475 135 6619

Aliza Werner-Seidler publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Aliza Werner-Seidler between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Aliza Werner-Seidler published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2025. 40 of the 175 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2025. 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 1 publication 2012: 2 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 22 publications 2023: 26 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 27 publications
2007 2025

175 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Aliza Werner-Seidler: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 1
2008 0
2009 0
2010 1
2011 1
2012 2
2013 2
2014 5
2015 4
2016 4
2017 10
2018 11
2019 8
2020 16
2021 22
2022 22
2023 26
2024 13
2025 27
Total 175
Download as CSV

Aliza Werner-Seidler publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aliza Werner-Seidler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 135 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 135
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Aliza Werner-Seidler D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Aliza Werner-Seidler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Aliza Werner-Seidler is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia. Their primary field of study is Psychology, with a focus on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, and Education.

Their research covers a range of main topics including:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health

Werner-Seidler has contributed to several research papers, among which are:

  • School-based depression and anxiety prevention programs: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis, 2021, Clinical Psychology Review
  • Practitioner review: Co-design of digital mental health technologies with children and young people, 2020, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • The impact of COVID-19 on the lives and mental health of Australian adolescents, 2021, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • The relationship between screen time and mental health in young people: A systematic review of longitudinal studies, 2021, Clinical Psychology Review
  • A randomised controlled trial of a relationship-focussed mobile phone application for improving adolescents' mental health, 2020, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Werner-Seidler frequently publishes in the following venues:

  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • British Journal of Clinical Psychology
  • BMJ Open

Collaborative work includes frequent co-authorship with:

  • Helen Christensen
  • Philip J. Batterham
  • Alison L. Calear
  • Bridianne O'Dea
  • Joanne R. Beames

Best Publications

  • School-based depression and anxiety prevention programs for young people: A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Aliza Werner-Seidler;Yael Perry;Alison L. Calear;Jill M. Newby

  • Disruptions in autobiographical memory processing in depression and the emergence of memory therapeutics

    Tim Dalgleish;Aliza Werner-Seidler

  • Practitioner review: Co-design of digital mental health technologies with children and young people

    Rhys Bevan Jones;Rhys Bevan Jones;Paul Stallard;Sharifah Shameem Agha;Sharifah Shameem Agha;Simon Rice

  • Suicide prevention using self-guided digital interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

    Michelle Torok;Jin Han;Simon Baker;Aliza Werner-Seidler

  • An investigation of the relationship between positive affect regulation and depression.

    Aliza Werner-Seidler;Rosie Banks;Barnaby D. Dunn;Michelle L. Moulds

  • School-based depression and anxiety prevention programs: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Aliza Werner-Seidler;Samantha Spanos;Alison L. Calear;Yael Perry

  • The impact of COVID-19 on the lives and mental health of Australian adolescents.

    Sophie H Li;Joanne R Beames;Jill M Newby;Jill M Newby;Kate Maston

  • Failing to Forget Inhibitory-Control Deficits Compromise Memory Suppression in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

    Ana Catarino;Charlotte S. Küpper;Aliza Werner-Seidler;Tim Dalgleish

  • The relationship between screen time and mental health in young people: A systematic review of longitudinal studies

    Samantha Tang;Aliza Werner-Seidler;Michelle Torok;Andrew J. Mackinnon

  • The relationship between social support networks and depression in the 2007 National Survey of Mental Health and Well-being.

    Aliza Werner-Seidler;Mohammad H. Afzali;Cath Chapman;Matthew Sunderland

  • Autobiographical episodic memory-based training for the treatment of mood, anxiety and stress-related disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Caitlin Hitchcock;Aliza Werner-Seidler;Simon E. Blackwell;Tim Dalgleish

  • Autobiographical memory characteristics in depression vulnerability: formerly depressed individuals recall less vivid positive memories.

    Aliza Werner-Seidler;Michelle L. Moulds

  • Mood repair and processing mode in depression.

    Aliza Werner-Seidler;Michelle L. Moulds

  • Mental Health Training Programs for Secondary School Teachers: A Systematic Review

    Melissa Anderson;Aliza Werner-Seidler;Catherine King;Aimée Gayed

  • Web-Based and Mobile Suicide Prevention Interventions for Young People: A Systematic Review.

    Yael Perry;Aliza Werner-Seidler;Alison L. Calear;Helen Christensen

  • Preventing Depression in Final Year Secondary Students: School-Based Randomized Controlled Trial.

    Yael Perry;Aliza Werner-Seidler;Alison Calear;Andrew Mackinnon

  • Pilot evaluation of the Sleep Ninja: a smartphone application for adolescent insomnia symptoms

    Aliza Werner-Seidler;Quincy Wong;Lara Johnston;Bridianne O'Dea

  • Effectiveness of a Web-Based Self-Help Program for Suicidal Thinking in an Australian Community Sample: Randomized Controlled Trial

    Bregje A.J. Van Spijker;Aliza Werner-Seidler;Philip J. Batterham;Andrew Mackinnon

  • How to e-mental health: a guideline for researchers and practitioners using digital technology in the context of mental health

    Unknown

  • A randomised controlled trial of a relationship-focussed mobile phone application for improving adolescents' mental health.

    Bridianne O'Dea;Jin Han;Philip J Batterham;Melinda R Achilles

  • School teachers: the forgotten frontline workers of Covid-19.

    Joanne R Beames;Helen Christensen;Aliza Werner-Seidler

  • Disruptions in autobiographical memory processing in depression and the emergence of memory

    Tim Dalgleish;Aliza Werner-Seidler

Frequent Co-Authors

Helen Christensen
Helen Christensen University of New South Wales
Tim Dalgleish
Tim Dalgleish University of Cambridge
Alison L. Calear
Alison L. Calear Australian National University
Michelle Torok
Michelle Torok Black Dog Institute
Bridianne O'Dea
Bridianne O'Dea Flinders University
Philip J. Batterham
Philip J. Batterham Australian National University
Michelle L. Moulds
Michelle L. Moulds University of New South Wales
Jill M. Newby
Jill M. Newby University of New South Wales
Peter Watson
Peter Watson University of Cambridge
Andrew Mackinnon
Andrew Mackinnon University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Psychology in the USA, there are a range of online degrees and specialized career paths available. One notable route is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), an in-demand credential for professionals who want to support individuals with behavioral challenges.

To pursue this career, it’s important to understand the bcba certification requirements in Garland and how educational backgrounds affect your pathway. For example, researching Gilbert bcba education requirements can give insight into necessary degrees or coursework for BCBA eligibility.

Additionally, the process may differ slightly depending on location, such as the Glendale bcba requirements or exploring local opportunities by becoming a bcba in Greensboro. Understanding these regional differences helps you identify which online psychology programs align with your chosen BCBA path.

Overall, online psychology degrees can open doors to careers in counseling, research, therapy, and behavioral analysis—helping you build a rewarding future while meeting key professional standards.

Best Scientists Citing Aliza Werner-Seidler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles