World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Glenn E. Palomaki

Glenn E. Palomaki

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
74
Citations
27773
World Ranking
19296
National Ranking
9612

Glenn E. Palomaki publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glenn E. Palomaki sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 368 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Glenn E. Palomaki D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Glenn E. Palomaki sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Glenn E. Palomaki is affiliated with Brown University in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a particular focus on several subfields including Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Genetics, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Obstetrics and Gynecology, and Infectious Diseases.

Their main research topics encompass:

  • Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
  • Parvovirus B19 Infection Studies
  • Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Ovarian function and disorders

Frequent co-authors working alongside Palomaki include:

  • Geralyn Lambert-Messerlian
  • J. Osinga
  • Arash Derakhshan
  • Ghalia Ashoor
  • Tuija Männistö

Palomaki's research has been published in various specialized and peer-reviewed venues. The most frequent publication venues are:

  • Genetics in Medicine
  • Prenatal Diagnosis
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
  • Journal of Medical Screening
  • Clinical Chemistry

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Glenn E. Palomaki are:

  • International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis Position Statement: cell free (cf)DNA screening for Down syndrome in multiple pregnancies, 2020, Prenatal Diagnosis
  • Increased chemotherapy-induced ovarian reserve loss in women with germline BRCA mutations due to oocyte deoxyribonucleic acid double strand break repair deficiency, 2020, Fertility and Sterility
  • DNA-based screening and population health: a points to consider statement for programs and sponsoring organizations from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), 2021, Genetics in Medicine
  • DNA-based screening and personal health: a points to consider statement for individuals and health-care providers from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), 2021, Genetics in Medicine
  • TSH and FT4 Reference Intervals in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis, 2022, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Best Publications

  • Maternal Thyroid Deficiency During Pregnancy and Subsequent Neuropsychological Development of the Child

    James E. Haddow;Glenn E. Palomaki;Walter C. Allan;Josephine R. Williams

  • Maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome in early pregnancy.

    N. J. Wald;H. S. Cuckle;J. W. Densem;K. Nanchahal

  • Cigarette smoking and serum lipid and lipoprotein concentrations: an analysis of published data.

    W. Y. Craig;G. E. Palomaki;J. E. Haddow

  • Dna Sequencing of Maternal Plasma to Detect Down Syndrome: An International Clinical Validation Study

    Glenn E. Palomaki;Edward M. Kloza;Geralyn M. Lambert-Messerlian;James E. Haddow

  • Maternal thyroid deficiency and pregnancy complications: implications for population screening.

    W C Allan;J E Haddow;G E Palomaki;J R Williams

  • The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention (EGAPP) Initiative: methods of the EGAPP Working Group.

    Steven M. Teutsch;Linda A. Bradley;Glenn E. Palomaki;James E. Haddow

  • DNA sequencing of maternal plasma reliably identifies trisomy 18 and trisomy 13 as well as Down syndrome: an international collaborative study

    Glenn E. Palomaki;Cosmin Deciu;Edward M. Kloza;Geralyn M. Lambert-Messerlian

  • Association between Exposure to Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Exacerbations of Asthma in Children

    Barbara A. Chilmonczyk;Luis M. Salmun;Keith N. Megathlin;Louis M. Neveux

  • Prenatal screening for Down's syndrome with use of maternal serum markers.

    James E. Haddow;Glenn E. Palomaki;George J. Knight;Josephine Williams

  • EGAPP supplementary evidence review: DNA testing strategies aimed at reducing morbidity and mortality from Lynch syndrome

    Glenn E. Palomaki;Monica R. McClain;Stephanie Melillo;Heather L. Hampel

  • Cystic fibrosis population carrier screening: 2004 revision of American College of Medical Genetics mutation panel

    Michael S Watson;Garry R Cutting;Robert J Desnick;Deborah A. Driscoll

  • The impact of maternal plasma DNA fetal fraction on next generation sequencing tests for common fetal aneuploidies.

    Jacob A. Canick;Glenn E. Palomaki;Edward M. Kloza;Geralyn M. Lambert-Messerlian

  • Noninvasive Fetal Sex Determination Using Cell-Free Fetal DNA: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    Stephanie A. Devaney;Glenn E. Palomaki;Joan A. Scott;Diana W. Bianchi

  • Screening of Maternal Serum for Fetal Down's Syndrome in the First Trimester

    James E. Haddow;Glenn E. Palomaki;George J. Knight;Josephine Williams

  • The cost-effectiveness of genetic testing strategies for Lynch syndrome among newly diagnosed patients with colorectal cancer

    Mercy Mvundura;Scott D Grosse;Heather Hampel;Glenn E Palomaki

  • Reference distributions for the negative acute-phase serum proteins, albumin, transferrin and transthyretin: a practical, simple and clinically relevant approach in a large cohort.

    Robert F. Ritchie;Glenn E. Palomaki;Louis M. Neveux;Olga Navolotskaia

  • Lipoprotein(a) as a risk factor for ischemic heart disease: metaanalysis of prospective studies

    Wendy Y. Craig;Louis M. Neveux;Glenn E. Palomaki;Meghan M. Cleveland

  • Reducing the need for amniocentesis in women 35 years of age or older with serum markers for screening.

    James E. Haddow;Glenn E. Palomaki;George J. Knight;George C. Cunningham

  • Assessing the Requirement for the 6-Hour Interval between Specimens in the American Heart Association Classification of Myocardial Infarction in Epidemiology and Clinical Research Studies

    Andrew R. MacRae;Peter A. Kavsak;Viliam Lustig;Rakesh Bhargava

  • Maternal serum unconjugated oestriol as an antenatal screening test for Down's syndrome

    N. J. Wald;H. S. Cuckle;J. W. Densem;K. Nanchahal

Frequent Co-Authors

James E. Haddow
James E. Haddow Brown University
Nicholas J. Wald
Nicholas J. Wald Queen Mary University of London
Allan S. Jaffe
Allan S. Jaffe Mayo Clinic
Mary E. D'Alton
Mary E. D'Alton Columbia University
David A. Nyberg
David A. Nyberg University of Washington
Dirk van den Boom
Dirk van den Boom Sequenom (United States)
Heather Hampel
Heather Hampel The Ohio State University
Jack V. Tu
Jack V. Tu University of Toronto
S. Ananth Karumanchi
S. Ananth Karumanchi Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
George G. Klee
George G. Klee Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in healthcare but not sure about a traditional medical degree? There are many flexible online degrees that can open doors to rewarding healthcare careers. Programs like medical billing and coding classes online are a quick way to enter the workforce, teaching you crucial skills in healthcare administration and records management.

For those wanting to provide direct patient care, nursing is a popular option. There are cheap online nursing programs that make it much more affordable to become a registered nurse. If you’re looking for more advanced practice opportunities, consider cheap online fnp programs to become a Family Nurse Practitioner.

Career advancement is also possible through higher-level credentials. For nurses wanting leadership or educational roles, cheapest online dnp programs provide a flexible and cost-effective path to the highest ranks in nursing.

These online pathways offer affordable, convenient alternatives to traditional on-campus degrees, and can help you build a rewarding healthcare career in less time.

Best Scientists Citing Glenn E. Palomaki

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles