World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
100
Citations
54615
World Ranking
8130
National Ranking
310

Janet E. Pope publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet E. Pope sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 730 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Janet E. Pope D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet E. Pope sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Janet E. Pope is affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in Canada and has a research focus primarily in the field of Medicine with a substantial contribution to Rheumatology. Their work covers multiple subfields including Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Immunology, and Genetics.

The scientist's main research topics include rheumatoid arthritis research and therapies, systemic sclerosis and related diseases, systemic lupus erythematosus research, autoimmune and inflammatory disorders, interstitial lung diseases and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, dermatologic treatments and research, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia research.

Janet E. Pope has authored several notable papers, some of which are:

  • EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update (2020) published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update (2022) published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • Tocilizumab in systemic sclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (2020) published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
  • C-reactive protein and implications in rheumatoid arthritis and associated comorbidities (2020) published in Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
  • Points to consider for the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases with Janus kinase inhibitors: a consensus statement (2020) published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Their frequent collaborators include Susan J. Bartlett, Carter Thorne, Glen Hazlewood, Gilles Boire, and Louis Bessette, indicating extensive teamwork within the field.

Janet E. Pope's research appears regularly in leading specialized journals, with a publishing record including venues such as:

  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • The Journal of Rheumatology
  • Lara D. Veeken
  • Arthritis & Rheumatology
  • Arthritis Care & Research

The scope of their research spans clinical and therapeutic approaches in autoimmune and inflammatory conditions, specifically focusing on rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, lupus, and related pulmonary manifestations. Their work contributes to understanding treatment guidelines, disease mechanisms, and comorbidities in these disorders.

Best Publications

  • 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: An american college of rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative

    Frank Van Den Hoogen;Dinesh Khanna;Jaap Fransen;Sindhu R. Johnson

  • A Randomized Trial of Arthroscopic Surgery for Osteoarthritis of the Knee

    Alexandra Kirkley;Trevor B. Birmingham;Robert B. Litchfield;J. Robert Giffin

  • Mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus.

    S. Bernatsky;J. F. Boivin;L. Joseph;S. Manzi

  • The effects of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors, methotrexate, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids on cardiovascular events in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Camille Roubille;Vincent Richer;Tara Starnino;Collette McCourt

  • Novel treatment strategies in rheumatoid arthritis

    Gerd R Burmester;Janet E Pope

  • Intermittent etidronate therapy to prevent corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis.

    J D Adachi;W G Bensen;J Brown;D Hanley

  • Digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: prevention by treatment with bosentan, an oral endothelin receptor antagonist.

    J. H. Korn;Maureen D Mayes;M. Matucci Cerinic;M. Rainisio

  • Evidence-based detection of pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: the DETECT study

    J Gerry Coghlan;Christopher P Denton;Ekkehard Grünig;Diana Bonderman

  • A Meta-analysis of the Effects of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs on Blood Pressure

    Janet E. Pope;Jennifer J. Anderson;David T. Felson

  • Safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab in adults with systemic sclerosis (faSScinate): a phase 2, randomised, controlled trial

    Dinesh Khanna;Christopher P Denton;Angelika Jahreis;Jacob M van Laar

  • Tocilizumab in systemic sclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

    Dinesh Khanna;Celia J F Lin;Daniel E Furst;Jonathan Goldin

  • Bosentan treatment of digital ulcers related to systemic sclerosis: results from the RAPIDS-2 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    Marco Matucci-Cerinic;Christopher P Denton;Daniel E Furst;Maureen D Mayes

  • Standardization of the modified Rodnan skin score for use in clinical trials of systemic sclerosis

    Dinesh Khanna;Daniel E. Furst;Philip J. Clements;Yannick Allanore

  • A randomized, controlled trial of methotrexate versus placebo in early diffuse scleroderma

    Janet E. Pope;Nicholas Bellamy;James R. Seibold;Murray Baron

  • An International Cohort Study of Cancer in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

    S. Bernatsky;J. F. Boivin;L. Joseph;R. Rajan

  • Canadian Rheumatology Association Recommendations for Pharmacological Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis with Traditional and Biologic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs

    Vivian P Bykerk;Pooneh Akhavan;Glen S Hazlewood;Orit Schieir

  • Transancestral mapping and genetic load in systemic lupus erythematosus

    Carl D. Langefeld;Hannah C. Ainsworth;Deborah S. Cunninghame Graham;Jennifer A. Kelly

  • Calcium-channel blockers for Raynaud's phenomenon in systemic sclerosis.

    Andrew E. Thompson;Beverley Shea;Vivian Welch;Deborah Fenlon

  • Psoriasis and pustular dermatitis triggered by TNF-{alpha} inhibitors in patients with rheumatologic conditions

    Gillian C. de Gannes;Mehran Ghoreishi;Janet Pope;Anthony Russell

  • Cancer risk in systemic lupus: An updated international multi-centre cohort study

    Sasha Bernatsky;Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman;Jeremy Labrecque;Lawrence Joseph

Frequent Co-Authors

Dinesh Khanna
Dinesh Khanna University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Christopher P. Denton
Christopher P. Denton University College London
Edward C. Keystone
Edward C. Keystone University of Toronto
Marco Matucci-Cerinic
Marco Matucci-Cerinic University of Florence
Daniel E. Furst
Daniel E. Furst University of California, Los Angeles
Paul R. Fortin
Paul R. Fortin Université Laval
Oliver Distler
Oliver Distler University of Zurich
Yannick Allanore
Yannick Allanore Université Paris Cité
Maureen D. Mayes
Maureen D. Mayes The University of Texas at Austin
Claire Bombardier
Claire Bombardier University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in medicine doesn’t always mean following the traditional path to becoming a doctor. There are numerous online degrees and alternative career pathways available for those interested in the healthcare field.

For example, nursing schools that don't require teas test offer a flexible entry point for aspiring nurses who may not want to take additional standardized exams. This can make beginning a nursing career more accessible.

If you’re looking to advance your education quickly, explore accelerated healthcare programs, which allow students to earn a degree in less time than traditional programs. This option can be ideal for career changers or those ready to fast-track their entry into healthcare management roles.

Nurses aiming for advanced practice roles often benefit from rn to np programs. These bridge programs enable registered nurses to become nurse practitioners, opening up new opportunities for leadership and specialized care.

Lastly, nutrition is a crucial aspect of healthcare, and you can start a career in this vital field with an online bachelor's in nutrition. This degree prepares graduates for roles in clinical nutrition, wellness coaching, and more.

Best Scientists Citing Janet E. Pope

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles