World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 100 8130 7642 310 295 730 54615

Janet E. Pope publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Janet E. Pope between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Janet E. Pope published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 26 papers a year. Output peaked at 70 publications in 2020. 77 of the 859 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 70. Peak 70 publications in 2020. 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 8 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 20 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 29 publications 2012: 36 publications 2013: 58 publications 2014: 54 publications 2015: 55 publications 2016: 52 publications 2017: 37 publications 2018: 53 publications 2019: 62 publications 2020: 70 publications 2021: 56 publications 2022: 38 publications 2023: 43 publications 2024: 37 publications 2025: 40 publications
1993 2025

859 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Janet E. Pope: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 2
1994 0
1995 2
1996 4
1997 1
1998 8
1999 3
2000 3
2001 2
2002 6
2003 4
2004 13
2005 11
2006 8
2007 16
2008 18
2009 20
2010 18
2011 29
2012 36
2013 58
2014 54
2015 55
2016 52
2017 37
2018 53
2019 62
2020 70
2021 56
2022 38
2023 43
2024 37
2025 40
Total 859
Download as CSV

Janet E. Pope publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet E. Pope sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 721–740 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 730 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259 730
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Janet E. Pope D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet E. Pope sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 100–101 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611 100
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Janet E. Pope is affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in Canada and has a research focus primarily in the field of Medicine with a substantial contribution to Rheumatology. Their work covers multiple subfields including Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Immunology, and Genetics.

The scientist's main research topics include rheumatoid arthritis research and therapies, systemic sclerosis and related diseases, systemic lupus erythematosus research, autoimmune and inflammatory disorders, interstitial lung diseases and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, dermatologic treatments and research, and chronic lymphocytic leukemia research.

Janet E. Pope has authored several notable papers, some of which are:

  • EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update (2020) published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update (2022) published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • Tocilizumab in systemic sclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (2020) published in The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
  • C-reactive protein and implications in rheumatoid arthritis and associated comorbidities (2020) published in Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism
  • Points to consider for the treatment of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases with Janus kinase inhibitors: a consensus statement (2020) published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Their frequent collaborators include Susan J. Bartlett, Carter Thorne, Glen Hazlewood, Gilles Boire, and Louis Bessette, indicating extensive teamwork within the field.

Janet E. Pope's research appears regularly in leading specialized journals, with a publishing record including venues such as:

  • Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • The Journal of Rheumatology
  • Lara D. Veeken
  • Arthritis & Rheumatology
  • Arthritis Care & Research

The scope of their research spans clinical and therapeutic approaches in autoimmune and inflammatory conditions, specifically focusing on rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, lupus, and related pulmonary manifestations. Their work contributes to understanding treatment guidelines, disease mechanisms, and comorbidities in these disorders.

Best Publications

  • 2013 classification criteria for systemic sclerosis: An american college of rheumatology/European league against rheumatism collaborative initiative

    Frank Van Den Hoogen;Dinesh Khanna;Jaap Fransen;Sindhu R. Johnson

  • A Randomized Trial of Arthroscopic Surgery for Osteoarthritis of the Knee

    Alexandra Kirkley;Trevor B. Birmingham;Robert B. Litchfield;J. Robert Giffin

  • Mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus.

    S. Bernatsky;J. F. Boivin;L. Joseph;S. Manzi

  • The effects of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors, methotrexate, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and corticosteroids on cardiovascular events in rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Camille Roubille;Vincent Richer;Tara Starnino;Collette McCourt

  • Novel treatment strategies in rheumatoid arthritis

    Gerd R Burmester;Janet E Pope

  • Intermittent etidronate therapy to prevent corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis.

    J D Adachi;W G Bensen;J Brown;D Hanley

  • Digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: prevention by treatment with bosentan, an oral endothelin receptor antagonist.

    J. H. Korn;Maureen D Mayes;M. Matucci Cerinic;M. Rainisio

  • Evidence-based detection of pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: the DETECT study

    J Gerry Coghlan;Christopher P Denton;Ekkehard Grünig;Diana Bonderman

  • A Meta-analysis of the Effects of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs on Blood Pressure

    Janet E. Pope;Jennifer J. Anderson;David T. Felson

  • Safety and efficacy of subcutaneous tocilizumab in adults with systemic sclerosis (faSScinate): a phase 2, randomised, controlled trial

    Dinesh Khanna;Christopher P Denton;Angelika Jahreis;Jacob M van Laar

  • Tocilizumab in systemic sclerosis: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

    Dinesh Khanna;Celia J F Lin;Daniel E Furst;Jonathan Goldin

  • Bosentan treatment of digital ulcers related to systemic sclerosis: results from the RAPIDS-2 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

    Marco Matucci-Cerinic;Christopher P Denton;Daniel E Furst;Maureen D Mayes

  • Standardization of the modified Rodnan skin score for use in clinical trials of systemic sclerosis

    Dinesh Khanna;Daniel E. Furst;Philip J. Clements;Yannick Allanore

  • A randomized, controlled trial of methotrexate versus placebo in early diffuse scleroderma

    Janet E. Pope;Nicholas Bellamy;James R. Seibold;Murray Baron

  • An International Cohort Study of Cancer in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

    S. Bernatsky;J. F. Boivin;L. Joseph;R. Rajan

  • Canadian Rheumatology Association Recommendations for Pharmacological Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis with Traditional and Biologic Disease-modifying Antirheumatic Drugs

    Vivian P Bykerk;Pooneh Akhavan;Glen S Hazlewood;Orit Schieir

  • Transancestral mapping and genetic load in systemic lupus erythematosus

    Carl D. Langefeld;Hannah C. Ainsworth;Deborah S. Cunninghame Graham;Jennifer A. Kelly

  • Calcium-channel blockers for Raynaud's phenomenon in systemic sclerosis.

    Andrew E. Thompson;Beverley Shea;Vivian Welch;Deborah Fenlon

  • Psoriasis and pustular dermatitis triggered by TNF-{alpha} inhibitors in patients with rheumatologic conditions

    Gillian C. de Gannes;Mehran Ghoreishi;Janet Pope;Anthony Russell

  • Cancer risk in systemic lupus: An updated international multi-centre cohort study

    Sasha Bernatsky;Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman;Jeremy Labrecque;Lawrence Joseph

Frequent Co-Authors

Dinesh Khanna
Dinesh Khanna University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Christopher P. Denton
Christopher P. Denton University College London
Edward C. Keystone
Edward C. Keystone University of Toronto
Marco Matucci-Cerinic
Marco Matucci-Cerinic University of Florence
Daniel E. Furst
Daniel E. Furst University of California, Los Angeles
Paul R. Fortin
Paul R. Fortin Université Laval
Oliver Distler
Oliver Distler University of Zurich
Yannick Allanore
Yannick Allanore Université Paris Cité
Maureen D. Mayes
Maureen D. Mayes The University of Texas at Austin
Claire Bombardier
Claire Bombardier University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in medicine doesn’t always mean following the traditional path to becoming a doctor. There are numerous online degrees and alternative career pathways available for those interested in the healthcare field.

For example, nursing schools that don't require teas test offer a flexible entry point for aspiring nurses who may not want to take additional standardized exams. This can make beginning a nursing career more accessible.

If you’re looking to advance your education quickly, explore accelerated healthcare programs, which allow students to earn a degree in less time than traditional programs. This option can be ideal for career changers or those ready to fast-track their entry into healthcare management roles.

Nurses aiming for advanced practice roles often benefit from rn to np programs. These bridge programs enable registered nurses to become nurse practitioners, opening up new opportunities for leadership and specialized care.

Lastly, nutrition is a crucial aspect of healthcare, and you can start a career in this vital field with an online bachelor's in nutrition. This degree prepares graduates for roles in clinical nutrition, wellness coaching, and more.

Best Scientists Citing Janet E. Pope

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles