World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
60
Citations
10858
World Ranking
3590
National Ranking
384

S. Craig Roberts publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where S. Craig Roberts sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 160 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

S. Craig Roberts D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where S. Craig Roberts sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

S. Craig Roberts is affiliated with the University of Stirling in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with a significant body of work in experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, and sensory systems. They also contribute to biomedical engineering and nutrition and dietetics. The scientist's work spans several interconnected topics, notably evolutionary psychology and human behavior, olfactory and sensory function studies, advanced chemical sensor technologies, attachment and relationship dynamics, biochemical analysis and sensing techniques, animal behavior and reproduction, and neuroendocrine regulation and behavior.

Their publication record includes frequent contributions to several academic venues. The most common are:

  • Human Ethology
  • Scientific Reports
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Archives of Sexual Behavior
  • Evolution and Human Behavior

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by S. Craig Roberts are the following:

  • "Human olfactory communication: current challenges and future prospects," 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • "More Than Smell-COVID-19 Is Associated With Severe Impairment of Smell, Taste, and Chemesthesis," 2020, Chemical Senses
  • "How and why patterns of sexual dimorphism in human faces vary across the world," 2021, Scientific Reports
  • "Major histocompatibility complex-associated odour preferences and human mate choice: near and far horizons," 2020, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • "The best COVID-19 predictor is recent smell loss: a cross-sectional study," 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

The scientist frequently collaborates with peers, including Piotr Sorokowski, Jan Havlíček, Marta Kowal, Agnieszka Sorokowska, and Tomasz Frąckowiak.

Best Publications

  • Facial appearance affects voting decisions.

    Anthony C. Little;Anthony C. Little;Robert P. Burriss;Benedict C. Jones;S. Craig Roberts

  • More Than Smell-COVID-19 Is Associated With Severe Impairment of Smell, Taste, and Chemesthesis.

    Valentina Parma;Kathrin Ohla;Maria G Veldhuizen;Masha Y Niv

  • Female facial attractiveness increases during the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle

    S. Craig Roberts;Jan Havlicek;Jaroslav Flegr;Martina Hruskova

  • MHC-correlated mate choice in humans: A review

    Jan Havlicek;S. Craig Roberts

  • Scent-marking by male mammals: Cheat-proof signals to competitors and mates

    Unknown

  • Women's preference for dominant male odour: effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status

    Jan Havlicek;S. Craig Roberts;Jaroslav Flegr

  • MHC-heterozygosity and human facial attractiveness

    S. Craig Roberts;S. Craig Roberts;Anthony C. Little;L. Morris Gosling;David I. Perrett

  • MHC-correlated odour preferences in humans and the use of oral contraceptives.

    S. Craig Roberts;L. Morris Gosling;Vaughan Carter;Marion Petrie

  • No Compelling Evidence that Preferences for Facial Masculinity Track Changes in Women’s Hormonal Status:

    Benedict C. Jones;Amanda C. Hahn;Claire I. Fisher;Hongyi Wang

  • Genetic similarity and quality interact in mate choice decisions by female mice

    S Craig Roberts;L Morris Gosling

  • Variability of Affective Responses to Odors: Culture, Gender, and Olfactory Knowledge

    Camille Ferdenzi;S Craig Roberts;S Craig Roberts;Annett Schirmer;Sylvain Delplanque

  • Good genes, complementary genes and human mate preferences

    S. Craig Roberts;Anthony C. Little

  • Distinguishing between Perceiver and Wearer Effects in Clothing Color-Associated Attributions

    S. Craig Roberts;Roy C. Owen;Jan Havlicek

  • Evidence that androstadienone, a putative human chemosignal, modulates women's attributions of men's attractiveness.

    Tamsin K. Saxton;Anna Lyndon;Anthony C. Little;S. Craig Roberts

  • Methods of Human Body Odor Sampling: The Effect of Freezing

    Pavlina Lenochova;S. Craig Roberts;Jan Havlicek

  • The perception of attractiveness and trustworthiness in male faces affects hypothetical voting decisions differently in wartime and peacetime scenarios

    Anthony C. Little;S. Craig Roberts;Benedict C. Jones;Lisa M. DeBruine

  • Vocal and Facial Attractiveness Judgments of Children, Adolescents and Adults: the Ontogeny of Mate Choice

    Tamsin K. Saxton;Peter G. Caryl;S. Craig Roberts

  • Kin recognition signals in adult faces.

    Lisa M. DeBruine;Finlay G. Smith;Benedict C. Jones;S. Craig Roberts

  • He sees, she smells? Male and female reports of sensory reliance in mate choice and non-mate choice contexts

    Jan Havlicek;Tamsin K. Saxton;S. Craig Roberts;Eva Jozifkova

  • Applied Evolutionary Psychology

    S. Craig Roberts

  • MHC-assortative facial preferences in humans.

    S. Craig Roberts;Anthony C Little;L. Morris Gosling;Benedict C Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan Havlíček
Jan Havlíček Charles University
Anthony C. Little
Anthony C. Little University of Bath
Benedict C. Jones
Benedict C. Jones University of Strathclyde
Lisa M. DeBruine
Lisa M. DeBruine University of Glasgow
Marion Petrie
Marion Petrie Newcastle University
David Sander
David Sander University of Geneva
Annett Schirmer
Annett Schirmer University of Innsbruck
Thomas V. Pollet
Thomas V. Pollet Northumbria University
Abraham P. Buunk
Abraham P. Buunk University of Groningen
Sylvain Delplanque
Sylvain Delplanque University of Geneva

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in psychology, exploring related online degrees can broaden your career options. Social work is a popular pathway, blending skills from psychology to help individuals, families, and communities improve their well-being. Accredited online programs make it easier than ever to earn your degree while balancing work or family commitments. For example, you can review the best online social work degree programs in America to find options that fit your goals.

If location matters, consider localized top programs. For those in Texas, you can explore the best online social work degree programs in Waco. Residents of the South also have excellent choices, as shown by the top social work degrees in Alabama and the best social work programs in Arkansas.

Pursuing these degrees can prepare you for rewarding careers in counseling, case management, healthcare, and community advocacy. With the right online program, you can start building a meaningful career supporting mental health and social change.

Best Scientists Citing S. Craig Roberts

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles