World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6222 5783 632 600 178 7884

Thomas V. Pollet publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas V. Pollet between 2006 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas V. Pollet published across 21 years, from 2006 to 2026, averaging 11.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2019. 17 of the 237 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2019. 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 16 publications 2026: 1 publication
2006 2026

237 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas V. Pollet: publications per year, 2006 to 2026
Year Publications
2006 2
2007 3
2008 5
2009 11
2010 4
2011 10
2012 13
2013 16
2014 11
2015 14
2016 13
2017 16
2018 14
2019 17
2020 13
2021 13
2022 15
2023 16
2024 14
2025 16
2026 1
Total 237
Download as CSV

Thomas V. Pollet publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas V. Pollet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 178 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 178
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas V. Pollet D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas V. Pollet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Thomas V. Pollet is affiliated with Northumbria University in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple disciplines, with a primary focus on psychology and social sciences. Within these fields, their work extensively covers subfields including parasitology, experimental and cognitive psychology, insect science, social psychology, and sociology and political science.

Their main research topics center on vector-borne infectious diseases, viral infections and vectors, and health disparities and outcomes. Additional areas of interest include evolutionary psychology and human behavior, insect symbiosis and bacterial influences, vector-borne animal diseases, and insect and pesticide research.

Pollet has published articles in several journals, often exploring the relationships between microbial communities, disease vectors, and their environments. Frequent publication venues include Body Image, Peer Community In Infections, Frontiers in Microbiology, Scientific Reports, and Parasites & Vectors.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Pollet include:

  • "Update on the intricate tango between tick microbiomes and tick-borne pathogens," 2020, Parasite Immunology
  • "The scale affects our view on the identification and distribution of microbial communities in ticks," 2020, Parasites & Vectors
  • "Cryptosporidium parvum Infection Depletes Butyrate Producer Bacteria in Goat Kid Microbiome," 2020, Frontiers in Microbiology
  • "Detection of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus in Hyalomma marginatum ticks, southern France, May 2022 and April 2023," 2024, Eurosurveillance
  • "Meteorological and climatic variables predict the phenology of Ixodes ricinus nymph activity in France, accounting for habitat heterogeneity," 2022, Scientific Reports

Throughout their career, Pollet has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including Sara Moutailler, Tamsin K. Saxton, Laurence Vial, Jean-François Cosson, and Kristofor McCarty. These collaborations indicate an interdisciplinary approach encompassing parasitology, vector ecology, and related health research topics.

Best Publications

  • Political Extremism Predicts Belief in Conspiracy Theories

    Jan-Willem van Prooijen;André P. M. Krouwel;Thomas V. Pollet

  • Exploring variation in active network size: Constraints and ego characteristics

    Sam G. B. Roberts;Robin I. M. Dunbar;Thomas V. Pollet;Toon Kuppens

  • Use of Social Network Sites and Instant Messaging Does Not Lead to Increased Offline Social Network Size, or to Emotionally Closer Relationships with Offline Network Members

    Thomas V. Pollet;Sam G. B. Roberts;Robin I. M. Dunbar

  • Natural Selection on Male Wealth in Humans

    Daniel Nettle;Thomas V. Pollet

  • Interventions for children and adolescents with posttraumatic stress disorder: A meta-analysis of comparative outcome studies.

    Nexhmedin Morina;Rachel Koerssen;Thomas V. Pollet

  • Extraverts Have Larger Social Network Layers: But Do Not Feel Emotionally Closer to Individuals at Any Layer

    Thomas V. Pollet;Sam G. B. Roberts;Robin I. M. Dunbar

  • Reproductive behavior and personality traits of the Five Factor Model

    Markus Jokela;Alexandra Alvergne;Thomas V. Pollet;Virpi Lummaa

  • Prevalence of depression and posttraumatic stress disorder in adult civilian survivors of war who stay in war-afflicted regions. A systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological studies.

    Nexhmedin Morina;Nexhmedin Morina;Kimberly Stam;Thomas V. Pollet;Stefan Priebe

  • What Can Cross-Cultural Correlations Teach Us about Human Nature?

    Thomas V. Pollet;Joshua M. Tybur;Willem E. Frankenhuis;Ian J. Rickard

  • Human Height Is Positively Related to Interpersonal Dominance in Dyadic Interactions

    Gert Stulp;Abraham P. Buunk;Simon Verhulst;Thomas V. Pollet

  • Driving a hard bargain: sex ratio and male marriage success in a historical US population

    Thomas V Pollet;Daniel Nettle

  • Tall claims?: Sense and nonsense about the importance of height of US presidents

    Gert Stulp;Abraham P. Buunk;Simon Verhulst;Thomas V. Pollet

  • Evolution, situational affordances, and the HEXACO model of personality

    Reinout Everhard de Vries;Reinout Everhard de Vries;Joshua M. Tybur;Thomas V. Pollet;Mark van Vugt

  • Revisiting the Red Effect on Attractiveness and Sexual Receptivity: No effect of the color red on human mate preferences

    Leonard S. Peperkoorn;S. Craig Roberts;Thomas V. Pollet

  • The ‘strength of weak ties’ among female baboons: fitness-related benefits of social bonds

    Richard McFarland;Richard McFarland;Derek Murphy;Derek Murphy;David Lusseau;S. Peter Henzi;S. Peter Henzi

  • Lineage based differences in grandparental investment: Evidence from a large British cohort study

    Thomas V. Pollet;Mark Nelissen;Daniel Nettle

  • To remove or not to remove : the impact of outlier handling on significance testing in testosterone data

    Thomas V. Pollet;Leander van der Meij

  • Male facial width is associated with death by contact violence: narrow-faced males are more likely to die from contact violence

    Michael Stirrat;Gert Stulp;Thomas V. Pollet

  • Sex differences in risk taking behavior among Dutch cyclists

    Kelly D. Cobey;Gert Stulp;Freek Laan;Abraham P. Buunk

  • Genetic relatedness and sibling relationship characteristics in a modern society

    Thomas V. Pollet

Frequent Co-Authors

Abraham P. Buunk
Abraham P. Buunk University of Groningen
Daniel Nettle
Daniel Nettle Newcastle University
Louise Barrett
Louise Barrett University of Lethbridge
Robin I. M. Dunbar
Robin I. M. Dunbar University of Oxford
Simon Verhulst
Simon Verhulst University of Groningen
S. Craig Roberts
S. Craig Roberts University of Stirling
Reinout E. de Vries
Reinout E. de Vries Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
S. Peter Henzi
S. Peter Henzi University of Lethbridge
Joshua M. Tybur
Joshua M. Tybur Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Anthony C. Little
Anthony C. Little University of Bath

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens the door to a range of online degree programs and professional pathways. Many students choose to further their education with online degrees in counseling or related fields, offering flexibility and a direct route to licensure and practice.

When considering specialized programs, location can play a pivotal role. For those interested in California, the best counseling program rankings in Stockton provide insight into top institutions and their offerings. If Arizona is your preferred state, you can explore the best counseling program rankings in Tucson to find accredited and highly regarded programs in that area.

Students considering Texas will benefit from the best college counseling programs in Texas, which highlight schools with strong practical and research components. Similarly, those looking to study in the Pacific Northwest should consult the best college counseling programs in Washington for guidance on top-rated degree options.

Whether pursuing clinical roles, research, or educational careers, these ranked programs can help you make informed decisions about your academic and professional journey in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas V. Pollet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles