World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ted Selker

Ted Selker

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
36
Citations
6669
World Ranking
8610
National Ranking
2385

Ted Selker publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ted Selker sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 152 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Ted Selker D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ted Selker sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ted Selker is affiliated with MIT in the United States and conducts research primarily in the field of Computer Science. Their scholarly work spans several subfields, including Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Signal Processing, Computer Networks and Communications, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The scientist's research covers multiple topics, with particular focus on:

  • Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
  • Spam and Phishing Detection
  • User Authentication and Security Systems
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Mobile Agent-Based Network Management
  • Advanced Steganography and Watermarking Techniques
  • Cryptography and Data Security

Ted Selker has contributed to several recent publications, including:

  • "Boardroom Voting: Verifiable Voting with Ballot Privacy Using Low-Tech Cryptography in a Single Room" (2020) published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "AI for the Generation and Testing of Ideas Towards an AI Supported Knowledge Development Environment" (2023) published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Phrase-verified voting: Verifiable low-tech remote boardroom voting" (2021) published in Cryptologia
  • "Phrase-Verified Voting: Verifiable Low-Tech Remote Boardroom Voting" (2021) published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Phrase-Verified Voting: Verifiable Low-Tech Remote Boardroom Voting" (2021) published in Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium)

The scientist frequently publishes in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), Cryptologia, Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium), and interactions.

Frequent collaborators in their work include Enka Blanchard, Alan T. Sherman, Ryan Robucci, Justin Pelletier, and Nikola K. Blanchard. Among these, Enka Blanchard is the most frequent co-author, contributing to eight collaborative publications.

Best Publications

  • A model of textual affect sensing using real-world knowledge

    Hugo Liu;Henry Lieberman;Ted Selker

  • Out of context: computer systems that adapt to, and learn from, context

    H. Lieberman;T. Selker

  • COACH: a teaching agent that learns

    Ted Selker

  • Creativity support tools: Report from a U.S. National Science Foundation sponsored workshop

    Ben Shneiderman;Gerhard Fischer;Mary Czerwinski;Mitchel Resnick

  • Design Principles for Tools to Support Creative Thinking

    Mitchel Resnick;Brad Myers;Kumiyo Nakakoji;Ben Shneiderman

  • Waterbot: exploring feedback and persuasive techniques at the sink

    Ernesto Arroyo;Leonardo Bonanni;Ted Selker

  • The Uniform Memory Hierarchy Model of Computation

    Bowen Alpern;Larry Carter;Ephraim Feig;Ted Selker

  • Improving Browsing Performance: A study of four input devices for scrolling and pointing tasks

    Shumin Zhai;Barton A. Smith;Ted Selker

  • Usability tool for analysis of web designs using mouse tracks

    Ernesto Arroyo;Ted Selker;Willy Wei

  • A look at human interaction with pervasive computers

    W. S. Ark;T. Selker

  • SUITOR: an attentive information system

    Paul P. Maglio;Rob Barrett;Christopher S. Campbell;Ted Selker

  • Force-to-motion functions for pointing

    Joseph D. Rutledge;Ted Selker

  • Lover's cups: drinking interfaces as new communication channels

    Hyemin Chung;Chia-Hsun Jackie Lee;Ted Selker

  • Attention-based design of augmented reality interfaces

    Leonardo Bonanni;Chia-Hsun Lee;Ted Selker

  • GOOSE: A Goal-Oriented Search Engine with Commonsense

    Hugo Liu;Henry Lieberman;Ted Selker

  • Interacting with groups of computers

    Jeffrey S. Shell;Ted Selker;Roel Vertegaal

  • Context-aware office assistant

    Hao Yan;Ted Selker

  • New paradigms for using computers

    Ted Selker

  • Visualizing the affective structure of a text document

    Hugo Liu;Ted Selker;Henry Lieberman

  • Interruptions as multimodal outputs: which are the less disruptive?

    E. Arroyo;T. Selker;A. Stouffs

  • Dual stream input for pointing and scrolling

    Shumin Zhai;Barton A. Smith;Ted Selker

  • Context aware design and interaction in computer systems: Media bed

    Ted Selker;Winslow Burleson

Frequent Co-Authors

Shumin Zhai
Shumin Zhai Google (United States)
Paul P. Maglio
Paul P. Maglio University of California, Merced
Ben Shneiderman
Ben Shneiderman University of Maryland, College Park
Brad A. Myers
Brad A. Myers Carnegie Mellon University
Mary Czerwinski
Mary Czerwinski Microsoft (United States)
Roel Vertegaal
Roel Vertegaal Huawei Technologies (Canada)
Benjamin B. Bederson
Benjamin B. Bederson University of Maryland, College Park
Clifford Nass
Clifford Nass Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to various career pathways, many of which now offer flexible online learning options. For those interested in leadership roles, an online project management degree provides skills in planning, organization, and execution of technology projects across industries.

Technology also revolutionizes traditional fields such as real estate. Pursuing a real estate degree online teaches the foundations of property, data analytics, and market trends—essential for tech-savvy professionals in this growing sector.

For those drawn to creativity and user-centered design, an online ux degree provides up-to-date training in designing intuitive digital experiences, a crucial skill in today's tech-driven world.

Wondering about the value of these pathways? Discover insights into career advancement, earning potential, and industry demand by reading is a bachelor degree in project management worth it. With so many online options, it’s easier than ever to tailor your education to your engineering or technology ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Ted Selker

Trending Scientists