World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
5775
World Ranking
10281
National Ranking
4314

Vicki L. Hanson publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vicki L. Hanson sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 158 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Vicki L. Hanson D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vicki L. Hanson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Member of the National Academy of Engineering For contributions to the design of accessible systems and for leadership in the computer science and engineering community.
  • 2004 - ACM Fellow For contributions to computing technologies for people with disabilities.

Overview

Vicki L. Hanson is affiliated with the Association for Computing Machinery in the United States. Their research encompasses various aspects of technology use, aging, and ethics in computing, with a focus on accessible systems and assistive technology. Hanson's work spans interdisciplinary topics related to aging populations, communication technologies, and ethical considerations in business and education.

The recent publications by Hanson include:

  • "The harm in conflating aging with accessibility" (2021) in Communications of the ACM
  • "ACM's Reserves Enable Its Mission" (2024) in Communications of the ACM
  • "Communicating ACM priorities" (2021) in Communications of the ACM
  • "Ethics and values in the ACM awards program" (2022) in Communications of the ACM
  • "ACM at 75" (2022) in Communications of the ACM

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Hanson include Bran Knowles, Yvonne Rogers, Anne Marie Piper, Jenny Waycott, and Nigel Davies.

Hanson's work has appeared mainly in the following publication venues:

  • Communications of the ACM
  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)

The subfields of study connected to Hanson's research cover:

  • Demography
  • General Health Professions
  • Occupational Therapy
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Safety Research

The main topics of Hanson's research include:

  • Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
  • Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Ethics in Business and Education
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI

Hanson has received recognition from the engineering and computing communities, including being named a Member of the National Academy of Engineering in 2020 for contributions to the design of accessible systems and leadership in computer science and engineering. Hanson was also awarded the ACM Fellow distinction in 2004 for contributions to computing technologies for people with disabilities.

Best Publications

  • Method and system for providing browser functions on a web page for client-specific accessibility

    Frances C. Brown;Susan Crayne;Samuel R. Detweiler;Peter Gustav Fairweather

  • Method and system for providing a central repository for client-specific accessibility

    Frances C Brown;Susan Crayne;Samuel R. Detweiler;Peter Gustav Fairweather

  • Phonological coding in word reading: evidence from hearing and deaf readers.

    Vicki L. Hanson;Carol A. Fowler;Carol A. Fowler

  • Representing users in accessibility research

    Andrew Sears;Vicki L. Hanson

  • Digital motherhood: how does technology help new mothers?

    Lorna Gibson;Vicki L. Hanson

  • The wisdom of older technology (non)users

    Bran Knowles;Vicki L. Hanson

  • Short-Term Recall by Deaf Signers of American Sign Language: Implications of Encoding Strategy for Order Recall.

    Vicki L. Hanson

  • Influencing technology adoption by older adults

    Vicki L. Hanson

  • Age and web access: the next generation

    Vicki L. Hanson

  • Progress on Website Accessibility

    Vicki L. Hanson;John T. Richards

  • Web accessibility: a broader view

    John T. Richards;Vicki L. Hanson

  • Linguistic coding by deaf children in relation to beginning reading success.

    Vicki L. Hanson;Isabelle Y. Liberman;Isabelle Y. Liberman;Donald Shankweiler;Donald Shankweiler

  • Deaf signers and serial recall in the visual modality: Memory for signs, fingerspelling, and print

    Rena Arens Krakow;Rena Arens Krakow;Vicki L. Hanson

  • Engaging the disengaged: how do we design technology for digitally excluded older adults?

    Graeme W. Coleman;Lorna Gibson;Vicki L. Hanson;Ania Bobrowicz

  • Method and system of use of transcode directives for distributed control of transcoding servers

    Frances C. Brown;Susan Crayne;Samuel R. Detweiler;Peter Gustav Fairweather

  • Including accessibility within and beyond undergraduate computing courses

    Annalu Waller;Vicki L. Hanson;David Sloan

  • Open source and accessibility: advantages and limitations

    Michael J. Heron;Vicki L. Hanson;Ian Ricketts

  • Web access for elderly citizens

    Vicki L. Hanson

  • System and method for transcoding support of web content over secure connections

    Frances C. Brown;Susan Crayne;Samuel R. Detweiler;Peter Gustav Fairweather

  • Method and system for delivering accessibility using a distributed environment

    Frances C. Brown;Susan Crayne;Samuel R. Detweiler;Peter Gustav Fairweather

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew Sears
Andrew Sears Pennsylvania State University
Peter Gregor
Peter Gregor University of Dundee
Chris Reed
Chris Reed University of Dundee
Donald Shankweiler
Donald Shankweiler University of Connecticut
Sara J. Czaja
Sara J. Czaja Cornell University
Per Ola Kristensson
Per Ola Kristensson University of Cambridge
Laurie Beth Feldman
Laurie Beth Feldman University at Albany, State University of New York
Carol A. Fowler
Carol A. Fowler University of Connecticut
Carol Padden
Carol Padden University of California, San Diego
Isabelle Y. Liberman
Isabelle Y. Liberman University of Connecticut

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online study options can open up diverse and flexible career pathways in Computer Science. In addition to traditional degrees, there are 3-month certificate programs that pay well for those looking for quick, skills-based credentials and faster entry into the workforce.

Many students also consider quickest cheapest masters degree programs, which can often be completed in as little as a year. These options are suitable for those wanting to build advanced expertise without a lengthy commitment or high tuition fees.

When choosing a pathway, it’s important to evaluate the job market demand. If you’re interested in making your educational investment count, you can explore programs listed among the most valuable masters degrees. These choices often lead to rewarding tech careers and higher salaries.

For those new to higher education or seeking a more affordable start, online associate degree programs offer a solid foundation in computer science and IT. These can serve as stepping stones toward bachelor’s and master’s degrees.

Best Scientists Citing Vicki L. Hanson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles