World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
5297
World Ranking
12122
National Ranking
767

Peter Gregor publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Gregor sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 81 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Peter Gregor D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Gregor sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Gregor is affiliated with the University of Dundee in the United Kingdom. Their research profile includes collaborations with frequent co-authors Šumak Boštjan and Pušnik Maja.

Their scientific work does not list specific research papers at this time, so no detailed publication record is available.

Gregor's research fields and subfields have not been specified, nor are there details on main topics studied or publication venues. There is no information on book publications or awards received.

Gregor remains an active researcher based on the available data.

Best Publications

  • What Is eHealth (4): A Scoping Exercise to Map the Field

    Claudia Pagliari;David Sloan;Peter Gregor;Frank Sullivan

  • Designing for dynamic diversity: interfaces for older people

    Peter Gregor;Alan F. Newell;Mary Zajicek

  • “User sensitive inclusive design”— in search of a new paradigm

    Alan F. Newell;Peter Gregor

  • NOPdb: Nucleolar Proteome Database--2008 update.

    Yasmeen Ahmad;François-Michel Boisvert;Peter Gregor;Andy Cobley

  • Computer use has no demonstrated impact on the well-being of older adults

    Anna Dickinson;Peter Gregor

  • User-Sensitive Inclusive Design

    A. F. Newell;P. Gregor;M. Morgan;G. Pullin

  • Design for older and disabled people – where do we go from here?

    Alan F. Newell;Peter Gregor

  • Human Computer Interfaces for People with Disabilities

    Alan F. Newell;Peter Gregor

  • Designing a portal for older users: A case study of an industrial/academic collaboration

    Alan F. Newell;Anna Dickinson;Mick J. Smith;Peter Gregor

  • Information technology for cognitive support

    Alan F. Newell;Alex Carmichael;Peter Gregor;Norman Alm

  • Designing for dynamic diversity: making accessible interfaces for older people

    Peter Gregor;Alan F Newell

  • Are guidelines enough?: an introduction to designing web sites accessible to older people

    S. Milne;A. Dickinson;A. Carmichael;D. Sloan

  • Establishment of a Protein Frequency Library and Its Application in the Reliable Identification of Specific Protein Interaction Partners

    Séverine Boulon;Yasmeen Ahmad;Laura Trinkle-Mulcahy;Céline Verheggen

  • An empirical investigation of ways in which some of the problems encountered by some dyslexics may be alleviated using computer techniques

    Peter Gregor;Alan F. Newell

  • Evaluating web resources for disability access

    Murray Rowan;Peter Gregor;David Sloan;Paul Booth

  • SeeWord—a personal word processing environment for dyslexic computer users

    Peter Gregor;Anna Dickinson;Alison Macaffer;Peter Andreasen

  • Issues surrounding the user-centred development of a new interactive memory aid

    E. A. Inglis;A. Szymkowiak;P. Gregor;A. F. Newell

  • Auditing accessibility of UK Higher Education web sites

    David Sloan;Peter Gregor;Paul Booth;Lorna Gibson

  • Strategies for teaching older people to use the World Wide Web

    Anna Dickinson;Roos Eisma;Peter Gregor;Audrey Syme

  • Accessible accessibility

    David Sloan;Peter Gregor;Murray Rowan;Paul Booth

  • Experiences obtained from designing with children

    Claire Jones;Louise McIver;Lorna Gibson;Peter Gregor

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan Evans
Jonathan Evans University of Glasgow
Vicki L. Hanson
Vicki L. Hanson Association for Computing Machinery
Angus I. Lamond
Angus I. Lamond University of Dundee
Barbara A. Wilson
Barbara A. Wilson St George's, University of London
Stephen J. McKenna
Stephen J. McKenna University of Dundee
Edouard Bertrand
Edouard Bertrand Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Tom Fahey
Tom Fahey Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
Claudia Pagliari
Claudia Pagliari University of Edinburgh
Sara J. Czaja
Sara J. Czaja Cornell University
John P. Kemp
John P. Kemp University of Bristol

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative online degrees is a smart move for students considering Computer Science in the USA. Many choose to start their journey with online associates degrees, which offer foundational knowledge and can be completed quickly from anywhere.

For those aiming to specialize, pursuing the shortest master degree programs can accelerate career progression. These programs are ideal for fast-tracking your qualifications without sacrificing academic rigor.

Deciding which path to take may depend on which roles or industries are most appealing. Researching what masters program should I do can help identify high-demand specializations and valuable degrees that lead to rewarding tech careers.

Budget-friendly options are also available. If affordability is a priority, check out the cheapest online degrees for quality programs that won’t break the bank.

Whether you’re starting out or planning to advance, these online pathways provide flexible options for building a successful career in computer science.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Gregor

Trending Scientists