World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
47
Citations
9788
World Ranking
3379
National Ranking
576

Ray Jones publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ray Jones sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 382 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Ray Jones D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ray Jones sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ray Jones is affiliated with Plymouth University in the United Kingdom. Their main field of study is Medicine, with a focus on subfields such as General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Demography, and Social Psychology.

Their research covers several specific topics including Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation, Healthcare Systems and Technology, Technology Use by Older Adults, Social Robot Interaction and Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, AI in Service Interactions, and Aging and Gerontology Research.

The frequent publication venues where Ray Jones has contributed include BMJ Open, JMIRx Med, Journal of Medical Internet Research, Health Policy and Technology, and JMIR Formative Research.

They have collaborated regularly with several coauthors, most notably Hannah Bradwell, Katie Edwards, Arunangsu Chatterjee, Rhona Winnington, and Serge Thill.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Ray Jones span various aspects of healthcare technology and social care:

  • Design recommendations for socially assistive robots for health and social care based on a large scale analysis of stakeholder positions (2021, Health Policy and Technology)
  • Intergroup 'Skype' Quiz Sessions in Care Homes to Reduce Loneliness and Social Isolation in Older People (2020, Geriatrics)
  • Barriers and Enablers in Implementing Electronic Consultations in Primary Care: Scoping Review (2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research)
  • Telerehabilitation for People With Physical Disabilities and Movement Impairment: A Survey of United Kingdom Practitioners (2021, JMIRx Med)
  • How do women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus use mHealth during and after pregnancy? Qualitative exploration of women's views and experiences (2021, Midwifery)

Best Publications

  • How smartphones are changing the face of mobile and participatory healthcare: an overview, with example from eCAALYX.

    Maged N Kamel Boulos;Steve Wheeler;Carlos M Tavares;Ray Jones

  • The effects of improving sleep on mental health (OASIS): a randomised controlled trial with mediation analysis

    Daniel Freeman;Daniel Freeman;Bryony Sheaves;Bryony Sheaves;Guy M Goodwin;Guy M Goodwin;Ly-Mee Yu

  • Health surveys in the workplace: comparison of postal, email and World Wide Web methods.

    R. Jones;N. Pitt

  • Randomised trial of personalised computer based information for cancer patients

    Jones R;Pearson J;McGregor S;Cawsey Aj

  • Patient safety: numerical skills and drug calculation abilities of nursing students and Registered Nurses

    Miriam McMullan;Ray Jones;Susan Lea

  • Assessment of the performance of five intensive care scoring models within a large Scottish database.

    Brian Livingston;Fiona MacKirdy;J. Howie;Ray Jones

  • How is the indoor environment related to asthma?: literature review

    George Richardson;Susan Eick;Raymond Jones

  • Dialectical argumentation to solve conflicts in advice giving

    Floriana Grasso;Alison Cawsey;Ray Jones

  • Math anxiety, self‐efficacy, and ability in British undergraduate nursing students

    Miriam McMullan;Ray Jones;Susan Lea

  • Patient information systems that tailor to the individual.

    Diana S Bental;Alison Cawsey;Ray Jones

  • Cross sectional survey of patients' satisfaction with information about cancer.

    Jones R;Pearson J;McGregor S;Gilmour Wh

  • Video-calls to reduce loneliness and social isolation within care environments for older people: an implementation study using collaborative action research

    Sonam Zamir;Catherine Hagan Hennessy;Adrian H Taylor;Ray B Jones

  • Problem presentation and responses on an online forum for young people who self-harm

    Janet Smithson;Siobhan Sharkey;Elaine Hewis;Ray Jones

  • Effectiveness of insoles used for the prevention of ulceration in the neuropathic diabetic foot: a systematic review

    Joanne Paton;Graham Bruce;Ray Jones;Elizabeth Stenhouse

  • What do evaluation instruments tell us about the quality of complementary medicine information on the internet

    Matthew Breckons;Ray Jones;Jenny Morris;Janet Richardson

  • A comparison of customised and prefabricated insoles to reduce risk factors for neuropathic diabetic foot ulceration: a participant-blinded randomised controlled trial.

    Joanne S Paton;Elizabeth A Stenhouse;Graham Bruce;Daniel Zahra

  • Functional imagery training versus motivational interviewing for weight loss: a randomised controlled trial of brief individual interventions for overweight and obesity

    Linda Solbrig;Ben Whalley;David J Kavanagh;Jon May

  • The multi-modal interface of Robot-Era multi-robot services tailored for the elderly

    Alessandro G. Di Nuovo;Alessandro G. Di Nuovo;Frank Broz;Ning Wang;Tony Belpaeme;Tony Belpaeme

  • Companion robots for older people: importance of user-centred design demonstrated through observations and focus groups comparing preferences of older people and roboticists in South West England.

    Hannah Louise Bradwell;Katie Jane Edwards;Rhona Winnington;Serge Thill

  • Effect of different forms of information produced for cancer patients on their use of the information, social support, and anxiety: randomised trial.

    R B Jones;J Pearson;A J Cawsey;D Bental

  • The Evaluation of a Personalised Health Information System for Patients with Cancer

    Alison J. Cawsey;Ray B. Jones;Janne Pearson

  • The effect of an interactive e-drug calculations package on nursing students' drug calculation ability and self-efficacy.

    Miriam McMullan;Ray Jones;Susan Lea

Frequent Co-Authors

Angelo Cangelosi
Angelo Cangelosi University of Manchester
Maged N. Kamel Boulos
Maged N. Kamel Boulos Sun Yat-sen University
Tamsin Ford
Tamsin Ford University of Cambridge
Jackie Andrade
Jackie Andrade Plymouth University
Michael E. Hyland
Michael E. Hyland Plymouth University
Ashley Woodcock
Ashley Woodcock University of Manchester
J. Derek Woollins
J. Derek Woollins University of St Andrews
Henry S. Rzepa
Henry S. Rzepa Imperial College London
Jon May
Jon May Plymouth University
Jørgen Vestbo
Jørgen Vestbo University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to diverse online degree options and rewarding careers. Many students are opting for flexible online programs that let them advance their education on their own schedule.

For those interested in social work, one year msw programs provide a fast-track route to becoming a licensed social worker. Psychology enthusiasts looking for a quick start can explore the fastest online psychology degree options available, saving time without sacrificing educational quality.

If you aspire to a counseling career, it’s essential to pursue cacrep-accredited programs for robust training and enhanced licensure opportunities. Meanwhile, those passionate about supporting couples and families can choose from a range of online marriage and family therapy graduate programs that prepare graduates for high-demand roles in therapy.

Whether you are seeking affordability, flexibility, or accredited training, these online degree pathways can help you create a meaningful career in the social sciences and humanities fields.

Best Scientists Citing Ray Jones

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles