World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Alex Mihailidis

Alex Mihailidis

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
51
Citations
10595
World Ranking
5330
National Ranking
205

Alex Mihailidis publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alex Mihailidis sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 252 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alex Mihailidis D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alex Mihailidis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alex Mihailidis is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada, specializing in research predominantly within the field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields including Biomedical Engineering, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Demography, Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, as well as Artificial Intelligence.

The research topics covered by Mihailidis encompass:

  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Older Adults Driving Studies
  • Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Mihailidis include:

  • "Sex and gender differences in caregiving burden experienced by family caregivers of persons with dementia: A systematic review" (2020) published in PLoS ONE
  • "Older People's Use of Digital Technology During the COVID-19 Pandemic" (2022) published in Bulletin of Science Technology & Society
  • "Older adults' acceptance of fully automated vehicles: Effects of exposure, driving style, age, and driving conditions" (2020) published in Accident Analysis & Prevention
  • "GPS driving: a digital biomarker for preclinical Alzheimer disease" (2021) published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
  • "Hand Extension Robot Orthosis (HERO) Grip Glove: enabling independence amongst persons with severe hand impairments after stroke" (2020) published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation

Frequent co-authors working together with Mihailidis include:

  • Bing Ye
  • Shehroz S. Khan
  • Brokoslaw Laschowski
  • Sayeh Bayat
  • Andrea Iaboni

The venues where Mihailidis frequently publishes their work include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • Gerontechnology
  • IEEE Access

In addition to journal articles, Mihailidis has contributed to scholarly books, including a publication with Springer International Publishing titled Knowledge, Innovation, and Impact in 2020.

Best Publications

  • A Survey on Ambient-Assisted Living Tools for Older Adults

    P. Rashidi;A. Mihailidis

  • The COACH prompting system to assist older adults with dementia through handwashing: An efficacy study

    Alex Mihailidis;Alex Mihailidis;Jennifer N Boger;Jennifer N Boger;Tammy Craig;Jesse Hoey

  • Automated handwashing assistance for persons with dementia using video and a partially observable Markov decision process

    Jesse Hoey;Pascal Poupart;Axel von Bertoldi;Tammy Craig

  • Ambient Assisted Living Technologies for Aging Well: A Scoping Review

    Stephanie Blackman;Claudine Matlo;Charisse Bobrovitskiy;Ashley Waldoch

  • An intelligent emergency response system: preliminary development and testing of automated fall detection.

    Tracy Lee;Alex Mihailidis

  • The use of computer vision in an intelligent environment to support aging-in-place, safety, and independence in the home

    A. Mihailidis;B. Carmichael;J. Boger

  • A planning system based on Markov decision processes to guide people with dementia through activities of daily living

    J. Boger;J. Hoey;P. Poupart;C. Boutilier

  • A decision-theoretic approach to task assistance for persons with dementia

    Jennifer Boger;Pascal Poupart;Jesse Hoey;Craig Boutilier

  • Technology and Dementia: The Future is Now.

    Arlene J Astell;Nicole Bouranis;Jesse Hoey;Allison Lindauer

  • Assisting persons with dementia during handwashing using a partially observable Markov decision process.

    Jesse Hoey;Axel von Bertoldi;Pascal Poupart;Alex Mihailidis

  • Robots to assist daily activities: views of older adults with Alzheimer's disease and their caregivers.

    Rosalie H. Wang;Aishwarya Sudhama;Momotaz Begum;Rajibul Huq

  • The efficacy of an intelligent cognitive orthosis to facilitate handwashing by persons with moderate to severe dementia

    Alex Mihailidis;Joseph C. Barbenel;Geoff Fernie

  • Difficulties in automatic speech recognition of dysarthric speakers and implications for speech-based applications used by the elderly: a literature review.

    Victoria Young;Alex Mihailidis

  • The acceptability of home monitoring technology among community-dwelling older adults and baby boomers.

    Alex Mihailidis;Amy Cockburn;Catherine Longley;Jennifer Boger

  • Principles for Fostering the Transdisciplinary Development of Assistive Technologies

    Jennifer Boger;Piper Jackson;Maurice Mulvenna;Judith Sixsmith

  • Autonomous Unobtrusive Detection of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults

    Ahmad Akl;Babak Taati;Alex Mihailidis

  • Emergency detection and response system and method

    Alex Mihailidis;Jesse Hoey;David Giesbrecht;Tracy Lee

  • Concurrent validity of the Microsoft Kinect for Windows v2 for measuring spatiotemporal gait parameters.

    Elham Dolatabadi;Elham Dolatabadi;Babak Taati;Babak Taati;Alex Mihailidis;Alex Mihailidis

  • The use of artificial intelligence in the design of an intelligent cognitive orthosis for people with dementia.

    Alex Mihailidis;Geoffrey R. Fernie;Joseph C. Barbenel

  • Context-aware assistive devices for older adults with dementia

    Alex Mihailidis;Geoffrey R. Fernie

  • The use of an intelligent prompting system for people with dementia

    Alex Mihailidis;Jennifer Boger;Marcelle Canido;Jesse Hoey

  • Pervasive Computing in Healthcare

    Jakob E. Bardram;Alex Mihailidis;Dadong Wan

Frequent Co-Authors

Jesse Hoey
Jesse Hoey University of Waterloo
Arlene Astell
Arlene Astell University of Toronto
Andrew Sixsmith
Andrew Sixsmith Simon Fraser University
Jasper Snoek
Jasper Snoek Google (United States)
Elizabeth Rochon
Elizabeth Rochon University of Toronto
Tom Chau
Tom Chau University of Toronto
Pascal Poupart
Pascal Poupart University of Waterloo
Alan K. Mackworth
Alan K. Mackworth University of British Columbia
Craig Boutilier
Craig Boutilier Google (United States)
Mark J. Rapoport
Mark J. Rapoport Sunnybrook Health Science Centre

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open many opportunities beyond traditional Computer Science study. For students concerned about their academic record, there are online graduate schools with low gpa requirements that offer flexible admission pathways, making higher education more accessible.

If you’re eager to start your career quickly, you may want to consider a 1 year computer science degree online. These accelerated programs provide an intensive curriculum designed to help you enter the workforce faster without sacrificing educational quality.

Students interested in environmental technology can consider degrees in environmental science or engineering. There are cheapest online environmental science degree options that make it affordable to gain expertise in this growing field, with flexible schedules suitable for working students.

Upon graduation, many wonder about potential career options. To learn more about the range of opportunities available, visit what jobs can you get with an environmental science degree, which provides a comprehensive look at various roles and industries you can pursue with an environmental science background.

Best Scientists Citing Alex Mihailidis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles