World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Genetics and Molecular Biology
UK
2024

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 113 330 301 22 21 368 45897

Angus I. Lamond publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Angus I. Lamond between 1982 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Angus I. Lamond published across 45 years, from 1982 to 2026, averaging 8.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2017. 13 of the 400 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2017. 1982: 2 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 10 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 14 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 20 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 12 publications 2026: 1 publication
1982 2026

400 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Angus I. Lamond: publications per year, 1982 to 2026
Year Publications
1982 2
1983 2
1984 0
1985 5
1986 1
1987 2
1988 2
1989 5
1990 10
1991 9
1992 6
1993 14
1994 7
1995 9
1996 9
1997 4
1998 6
1999 5
2000 5
2001 8
2002 18
2003 9
2004 5
2005 10
2006 9
2007 8
2008 11
2009 10
2010 17
2011 13
2012 13
2013 12
2014 10
2015 11
2016 11
2017 20
2018 14
2019 16
2020 17
2021 8
2022 13
2023 9
2024 12
2025 12
2026 1
Total 400
Download as CSV

Angus I. Lamond publications per year - data summary

  • Angus I. Lamond, a Molecular Biology scholar from University of Dundee, has 400 publications recorded across 45 years, from 1982 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1982 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2017, with 20 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1986 and 2026, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 45 years in the span carries no publications at all (1984).
  • The rate of publication averages 8.9 papers per year over the whole span, or 9.1 per year counting only the 44 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 47 publications, 12% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1982-1996: 83 publications (5.5 per year); 1997-2011: 138 publications (9.2 per year); 2012-2026: 179 publications (11.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Angus I. Lamond publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angus I. Lamond sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 367–376 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 368 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26 368
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Angus I. Lamond publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,076 Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 53 ranges running from 47–56 to 564+ publications.
  • Angus I. Lamond, a Molecular Biology scholar from University of Dundee, records 368 publications - the 88th percentile of the discipline.
  • 88% of ranked Molecular Biology scientists score the same or lower than Angus I. Lamond, and about 12% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 177–186 publications range, and Angus I. Lamond ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 117–126 publications, holding 177 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 53% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 177–186 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 564 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Angus I. Lamond D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angus I. Lamond sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 112–113 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 113 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19 113
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Angus I. Lamond D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,076 Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 40–41 to 145+ D-Index.
  • Angus I. Lamond, a Molecular Biology scholar from University of Dundee, records 113 D-Index - the 89th percentile of the discipline.
  • 89% of ranked Molecular Biology scientists score the same or lower than Angus I. Lamond, and about 11% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 68–69 D-Index range, and Angus I. Lamond ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 64–65 D-Index, holding 131 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 50% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 66–67 D-Index), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2024 - Research.com Genetics and Molecular Biology in United Kingdom Leader Award
  • 2010 - Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom
  • 1996 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)

Overview

Angus I. Lamond is affiliated with the University of Dundee in the United Kingdom. Their research focuses primarily within the field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a significant volume of work related to Molecular Biology.

Lamond's main subfields of study include:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Immunology
  • Cell Biology
  • Spectroscopy
  • Biomedical Engineering

Their research covers several key topics, including:

  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Pluripotent Stem Cells Research

Recent publications by Lamond feature a range of subjects from transcriptomics to cell cycle regulation and proteomics. Selected papers include:

  • Single-cell RNA-sequencing of differentiating iPS cells reveals dynamic genetic effects on gene expression, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Nrf2 activation reprograms macrophage intermediary metabolism and suppresses the type I interferon response, 2022, iScience
  • Cyclin A triggers Mitosis either via the Greatwall kinase pathway or Cyclin B, 2020, The EMBO Journal
  • Population-scale proteome variation in human induced pluripotent stem cells, 2020, eLife
  • Upregulation of RNA cap methyltransferase RNMT drives ribosome biogenesis during T cell activation, 2021, Nucleic Acids Research

Lamond frequently publishes in venues including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Trends in Biochemical Sciences
  • Nature Communications
  • eLife
  • Cell Reports

Collaborations are an important aspect of Lamond's work, with common coauthors being:

  • Alejandro J. Brenes
  • Hao Jiang
  • Jens Hukelmann
  • Dalila Bensaddek
  • Doreen A. Cantrell

Recognition of Lamond's scientific contributions includes fellowships and memberships in various prestigious organizations:

  • Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom (2010)
  • Fellow of the Royal Society of Edinburgh (1996)
  • Member of the European Molecular Biology Organization (EMBO)
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Best Publications

  • The multifunctional nucleolus

    François-Michel Boisvert;Silvana van Koningsbruggen;Joaquín Navascués;Angus I. Lamond

  • Nucleolar proteome dynamics

    Jens S. Andersen;Yun W. Lam;Anthony K.L. Leung;Shao En Ong

  • Directed proteomic analysis of the human nucleolus.

    Jens S. Andersen;Carol E. Lyon;Archa H. Fox;Anthony K.L. Leung

  • Nuclear speckles: a model for nuclear organelles.

    Angus I. Lamond;David L. Spector

  • Structure and Function in the Nucleus

    Angus I. Lamond;William C. Earnshaw

  • Large-Scale Proteomic Analysis of the Human Spliceosome

    Juri Rappsilber;Ursula Ryder;Angus I. Lamond;Matthias Mann

  • The Nucleolus under Stress

    Séverine Boulon;Belinda J. Westman;Saskia Hutten;François-Michel Boisvert

  • Retinoic acid regulates aberrant nuclear localization of PML-RARα in acute promyelocytic leukemia cells

    Karsten Weis;Sophie Rambaud;Catherine Lavau;Joop Jansen

  • Splicing of messenger RNA precursors

    P.A. Sharp;M.M. Konarksa;P.J. Grabowski;A.I. Lamond

  • Mass spectrometry and EST-database searching allows characterization of the multi-protein spliceosome complex.

    Gitte Neubauer;Angus King;Juri Rappsilber;Cinzia Calvio

  • Paraspeckles: a novel nuclear domain.

    Archa H. Fox;Yun Wah Lam;Anthony K.L. Leung;Carol E. Lyon

  • Common genetic variation drives molecular heterogeneity in human iPSCs

    Helena Kilpinen;Angela Goncalves;Andreas Leha;Vackar Afzal

  • Identifying specific protein interaction partners using quantitative mass spectrometry and bead proteomes

    Laura Trinkle-Mulcahy;Séverine Boulon;Yun Wah Lam;Roby Urcia

  • Transcription-dependent colocalization of the U1, U2, U4/U6, and U5 snRNPs in coiled bodies

    M Carmo-Fonseca;R Pepperkok;MT Carvalho;AI Lamond

  • Cajal bodies: a long history of discovery.

    Mario Cioce;Angus I. Lamond

  • A Quantitative Spatial Proteomics Analysis of Proteome Turnover in Human Cells

    Francois-Michel Boisvert;Yasmeen Ahmad;Marek Gierlinski;Fabienne Charrière

  • Multidimensional proteomics for cell biology

    Mark Larance;Angus I. Lamond

  • Proteomic Analysis of the Arabidopsis Nucleolus Suggests Novel Nucleolar Functions

    Alison F. Pendle;Gillian P. Clark;Reinier A. Boon;Dominika Lewandowska

  • Identification of hSRP1α as a Functional Receptor for Nuclear Localization Sequences

    Karsten Weis;Iain W. Mattaj;Angus I. Lamond

  • Regulation of mammalian spliceosome assembly by a protein phosphorylation mechanism.

    Jacqueline E. Mermoud;Patricia T.W. Cohen;Angus I. Lamond

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthias Mann
Matthias Mann Max Planck Institute of Biochemistry
Maria Carmo-Fonseca
Maria Carmo-Fonseca University of Lisbon
Jens S. Andersen
Jens S. Andersen University of Southern Denmark
Oliver Stegle
Oliver Stegle German Cancer Research Center
Alan R. Prescott
Alan R. Prescott University of Dundee
Eric A. Miska
Eric A. Miska University of Cambridge
Anthony K.L. Leung
Anthony K.L. Leung Johns Hopkins University
Fiona M. Watt
Fiona M. Watt King's College London
Jason R. Swedlow
Jason R. Swedlow University of Dundee
Frank Eisenhaber
Frank Eisenhaber Agency for Science, Technology and Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology in the USA opens the door to dynamic careers in research, healthcare, and biotechnology. Many graduates pursue advanced education online, thanks to flexible and reputable programs nationwide.

For those interested in bridging science and patient care, online msn programs for non nurses can help science graduates fast-track their transition into nursing leadership roles, even without prior nursing qualifications. If you are already in the nursing field, you might consider programs highlighted in top rated online nursing schools wgu, known for quality, flexibility, and student support.

Those seeking an accelerated path to advanced practice should also examine rn to bsn to msn online programs, designed for working nurses who want to expand their credentials efficiently. Many reputable institutions offer these degrees online, and it’s wise to explore non profit online schools for accredited, affordable, and high-quality education options.

By considering these related pathways, Molecular Biology students can enhance their qualifications and expand career opportunities across the healthcare and research sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Angus I. Lamond

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles