World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
53
Citations
9398
World Ranking
4896
National Ranking
294

Per Ola Kristensson publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Per Ola Kristensson sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 213 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Per Ola Kristensson D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Per Ola Kristensson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Per Ola Kristensson is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom and specializes in the field of Computer Science. Their research spans multiple subfields and topics primarily related to human-computer interaction and immersive technologies.

Kristensson has published extensively with a total output reflecting a strong focus on Human-Computer Interaction (70 publications), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (40 publications), Cognitive Neuroscience (20 publications), Social Psychology (14 publications), and Artificial Intelligence (11 publications).

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Augmented Reality Applications
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Hand Gesture Recognition Systems
  • Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Human Pose and Action Recognition

Regular collaborators in research and publications include John J. Dudley, Jens Grubert, Verena Biener, Eyal Ofek, and Michel Pahud. Kristensson's frequent publication venues feature arXiv (Cornell University) with 30 papers, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics with 15 papers, Apollo (University of Cambridge) with 6 papers, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction with 3 papers, and Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction also with 3 contributions.

Selected recent papers illustrate the scope and focus of Kristensson's research:

  • "Inclusive Immersion: a review of efforts to improve accessibility in virtual reality, augmented reality and the metaverse," 2023, Virtual Reality
  • "AeroVR: An immersive visualisation system for aerospace design and digital twinning in virtual reality," 2020, The Aeronautical Journal
  • "Investigating Positive and Negative Qualities of Human-in-the-Loop Optimization for Designing Interaction Techniques," 2022, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • "Quantifying the Effects of Working in VR for One Week," 2022, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • "Gesture Spotter: A Rapid Prototyping Tool for Key Gesture Spotting in Virtual and Augmented Reality Applications," 2022, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Best Publications

  • SHARK2: a large vocabulary shorthand writing system for pen-based computers

    Per-Ola Kristensson;Shumin Zhai

  • Shorthand writing on stylus keyboard

    Shumin Zhai;Per-Ola Kristensson

  • Dexmo: An Inexpensive and Lightweight Mechanical Exoskeleton for Motion Capture and Force Feedback in VR

    Xiaochi Gu;Yifei Zhang;Weize Sun;Yuanzhe Bian

  • A Review of User Interface Design for Interactive Machine Learning

    John J. Dudley;Per Ola Kristensson

  • Memorability of pre-designed and user-defined gesture sets

    Miguel A. Nacenta;Yemliha Kamber;Yizhou Qiang;Per Ola Kristensson

  • System and method for recognizing word patterns in a very large vocabulary based on a virtual keyboard layout

    Per-Ola Kristensson;Jingtao Wang;Shumin Zhai

  • System and method for issuing commands based on pen motions on a graphical keyboard

    Shumin Zhai;Per-Ola Kristensson

  • Observations on Typing from 136 Million Keystrokes

    Vivek Dhakal;Anna Maria Feit;Per Ola Kristensson;Antti Oulasvirta

  • The word-gesture keyboard: reimagining keyboard interaction

    Shumin Zhai;Per Ola Kristensson

  • I did that! Measuring users' experience of agency in their own actions

    David Coyle;James Moore;Per Ola Kristensson;Paul Fletcher

  • A versatile dataset for text entry evaluations based on genuine mobile emails

    Keith Vertanen;Per Ola Kristensson

  • System and method for improving text input in a shorthand-on-keyboard interface

    Per-Ola Kristensson;Shumin Zhai

  • An Evaluation of Space Time Cube Representation of Spatiotemporal Patterns

    P.O. Kristensson;N. Dahlback;D. Anundi;M. Bjornstad

  • Inclusive Immersion: a review of efforts to improve accessibility in virtual reality, augmented reality and the metaverse

    Unknown

  • The potential of dwell-free eye-typing for fast assistive gaze communication

    Per Ola Kristensson;Keith Vertanen

  • How do People Type on Mobile Devices?: Observations from a Study with 37,000 Volunteers

    Kseniia Palin;Anna Maria Feit;Sunjun Kim;Per Ola Kristensson

  • Improving two-thumb text entry on touchscreen devices

    Antti Oulasvirta;Anna Reichel;Wenbin Li;Yan Zhang

  • Shapewriter on the iphone: from the laboratory to the real world

    Shumin Zhai;Per Ola Kristensson;Pengjun Gong;Michael Greiner

  • Performance and User Experience of Touchscreen and Gesture Keyboards in a Lab Setting and in the Wild

    Shyam Reyal;Shumin Zhai;Per Ola Kristensson

  • The Office of the Future: Virtual, Portable, and Global

    Jens Grubert;Eyal Ofek;Michel Pahud;Per Ola Kristensson

  • VelociTap: Investigating Fast Mobile Text Entry using Sentence-Based Decoding of Touchscreen Keyboard Input

    Keith Vertanen;Haythem Memmi;Justin Emge;Shyam Reyal

  • Text Entry in Immersive Head-Mounted Display-Based Virtual Reality Using Standard Keyboards

    Jens Grubert;Lukas Witzani;Eyal Ofek;Michel Pahud

  • Relaxing stylus typing precision by geometric pattern matching

    Per-Ola Kristensson;Shumin Zhai

  • Foundational Issues in Touch-Surface Stroke Gesture Design

    Shumin Zhai;Per Ola Kristensson;Caroline Appert

Frequent Co-Authors

Shumin Zhai
Shumin Zhai Google (United States)
Eyal Ofek
Eyal Ofek Microsoft (United States)
Hrvoje Benko
Hrvoje Benko Facebook (United States)
Stephen Brewster
Stephen Brewster University of Glasgow
Giuseppe Carenini
Giuseppe Carenini University of British Columbia
Vicki L. Hanson
Vicki L. Hanson Association for Computing Machinery
David J. C. MacKay
David J. C. MacKay University of Cambridge
Jörg Müller
Jörg Müller Heinz Sielmann Foundation
Otmar Hilliges
Otmar Hilliges ETH Zurich
Paul C. Fletcher
Paul C. Fletcher University of Cambridge

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA offers a range of academic and professional options. For those seeking rewarding yet streamlined education, there are easy degrees that pay well—these programs combine accessibility with strong salary prospects upon graduation.

Technology fields are evolving rapidly, and online education keeps pace. Pursuing an ai online degree can open doors to specialized roles in machine learning, automation, and data science—areas with growing demand and lucrative positions.

Beyond computer science, students may consider other college programs that match their skills and interests, from information systems to engineering and digital marketing.

Advancing your education with one of the masters degrees highlighted for their manageable coursework can boost your leadership prospects without overwhelming workloads.

Ultimately, whether you aim for a fast-tracked degree, a specialized online program, or a flexible graduate path, the right choice can lead to fulfilling, future-proof careers in tech and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Per Ola Kristensson

Trending Scientists