World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Andreas Kotsadam

Andreas Kotsadam

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 33 917 829 15 13 113 5374

Andreas Kotsadam publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andreas Kotsadam between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andreas Kotsadam published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 11.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 34 publications in 2020. 25 of the 201 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 34. Peak 34 publications in 2020. 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 34 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 11 publications
2009 2025

201 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andreas Kotsadam: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 3
2010 2
2011 7
2012 7
2013 9
2014 10
2015 12
2016 5
2017 10
2018 17
2019 24
2020 34
2021 10
2022 11
2023 15
2024 14
2025 11
Total 201
Download as CSV

Andreas Kotsadam publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreas Kotsadam sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–115 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 113 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78 113
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Andreas Kotsadam D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreas Kotsadam sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81 33
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Andreas Kotsadam is affiliated with the University of Oslo in Norway and works primarily in the field of Social Sciences. Their research spans several subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research, Gender Studies, and Accounting. The scientist has a notable focus on a range of research topics such as Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare, Culture, Economy, and Development Studies, Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies, Electoral Systems and Political Participation, Taxation and Compliance Studies, School Choice and Performance, and Financial Literacy, Pension, and Retirement Analysis.

Their recent papers cover various subjects related to economics, political science, and social behavior. These include:

  • Does Integration Change Gender Attitudes? The Effect of Randomly Assigning Women to Traditionally Male Teams, 2020, The Quarterly Journal of Economics
  • How Settlement Locations and Local Networks Influence Immigrant Political Integration, 2020, American Journal of Political Science
  • Rainfall shocks and intimate partner violence in sub-Saharan Africa, 2020, Journal of Peace Research
  • Does Wealth Reduce Support for Redistribution? Evidence from an Ethiopian Housing Lottery, 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Sunshine or Curse? Foreign Direct Investment, the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, and Individual Corruption Experiences in Africa, 2020, International Studies Quarterly

Kotsadam has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Henning Finseraas, Jeremy Ferwerda, Espen Villanger, and Bernt Bratsberg. These collaborations reflect ongoing engagement with scholars in related domains over multiple publications.

Their work has appeared in various scholarly venues, notably:

  • AEA Randomized Controlled Trials
  • Harvard Dataverse
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • The Journal of Human Resources
  • Journal of Health Economics

In addition to journal articles, Kotsadam has contributed to book publications, including a title published by the Library and Information Centre of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences in 2020. The book is titled "Rearranging the Desk Chairs: A large randomized field experiment on the effects of close contact on interethnic relations = Csak a székek átrendezése a Titanicon? Egy nagymintás randomizált terepkísérlet tanulságai a közeli kontaktusok inter-etnikus kapcsolatokra gyakorlat hatásáról".

Best Publications

  • Cross-national and multilevel correlates of partner violence: an analysis of data from population-based surveys

    Lori L Heise;Andreas Kotsadam

  • The state intervenes in the battle of the sexes: Causal effects of paternity leave

    Andreas Kotsadam;Andreas Kotsadam;Henning Finseraas

  • Chinese aid and local corruption

    Ann Sofie Isaksson;Ann Sofie Isaksson;Andreas Kotsadam

  • The law and economics of international sex slavery: prostitution laws and trafficking for sexual exploitation

    Niklas Jakobsson;Andreas Kotsadam;Andreas Kotsadam

  • Resources and Intimate Partner Violence in Sub-Saharan Africa

    Sara Cools;Andreas Kotsadam

  • African mining, gender, and local employment

    Andreas Kotsadam;Anja Karolina Tolonen

  • African Mining, Gender, and Local Employment

    Andreas Kotsadam;Anja Karolina Tolonen

  • Mining and Local Corruption in Africa

    Carl Henrik Knutsen;Andreas Kotsadam;Eivind Hammersmark Olsen;Tore Wig

  • Development aid and infant mortality. Micro-level evidence from Nigeria

    Andreas Kotsadam;Andreas Kotsadam;Gudrun Østby;Siri Aas Rustad;Andreas Forø Tollefsen

  • Does Informal Eldercare Impede Women's Employment? The Case of European Welfare States

    Andreas Kotsadam

  • Racing to the bottom? Chinese development projects and trade union involvement in Africa

    Ann-Sofie Isaksson;Andreas Kotsadam

  • Does personal contact with ethnic minorities affect anti-immigrant sentiments? Evidence from a field experiment

    Henning Finseraas;Andreas Kotsadam

  • A Field Experiment of Discrimination in the Norwegian Housing Market: Gender, Class, and Ethnicity

    Lisa Andersson;Niklas Jakobsson;Andreas Kotsadam

  • Does integration change gender attitudes? The effect of randomly assigning women to traditionally male teams

    Gordon B. Dahl;Andreas Kotsadam;Dan-Olof Rooth

  • Did the Murder of Theo van Gogh Change Europeans' Immigration Policy Preferences?

    Henning Finseraas;Niklas Jakobsson;Andreas Kotsadam

  • The Gender Gap in African Political Participation: Testing Theories of Individual and Contextual Determinants

    Ann-Sofie Isaksson;Andreas Kotsadam;Måns Nerman

  • Gender and overconfidence: are girls really overconfident?

    L. Dahlbom;A. Jakobsson;N. Jakobsson;A. Kotsadam

  • Do Laws Affect Attitudes? - An assessment of the Norwegian prostitution law using longitudinal data

    Andreas Kotsadam;Andreas Kotsadam;Niklas Jakobsson;Niklas Jakobsson

  • Exposure to female colleagues breaks the glass ceiling—Evidence from a combined vignette and field experiment

    Henning Finseraas;Åshild A. Johnsen;Andreas Kotsadam;Gaute Torsvik

  • Shame on you, John! Laws, stigmatization, and the demand for sex

    Andreas Kotsadam;Andreas Kotsadam;Niklas Jakobsson

  • Gender Equity and Prostitution: An Investigation of Attitudes in Norway and Sweden

    Niklas Jakobsson;Andreas Kotsadam

  • Trust, ethnic diversity, and personal contact: A field experiment

    Henning Finseraas;Torbjørn Hanson;Åshild Auglænd Johnsen;Andreas Kotsadam

  • The local socioeconomic effects of gold mining : evidence from Ghana

    Andrew L. Dabalen;Punam Chuhan-Pole;Andreas Kotsadam;Anja Karolina Tolonen

  • Mining and Local Corruption in Africa

    Andreas Kotsadam;Eivind Hammersmark;Carl Henrik Knutsen;Tore Wig

Frequent Co-Authors

Henning Finseraas
Henning Finseraas Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Bernt Bratsberg
Bernt Bratsberg University of Oslo
Oddbjørn Raaum
Oddbjørn Raaum University of Oslo
Carl Henrik Knutsen
Carl Henrik Knutsen University of Oslo
Thomas Hansen
Thomas Hansen Copenhagen University Hospital
Lori Heise
Lori Heise Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore a Political Science degree in the USA, consider how online education can offer flexibility and broaden your career options. For those eager to enter the workforce quickly or advance their qualifications, choosing the fastest masters degree online is a smart way to accelerate your academic journey and open up new job opportunities in government, non-profits, or public policy.

Affordability is a key concern for many students. Searching for cheap online college classes can make continuing your Political Science studies accessible without the burden of excessive debt.

Political Science also overlaps with environmental and social issues. If you are interested in expanding your career scope, review the possibilities in jobs with elementary education degree and environmental science major salary to discover how policy and advocacy roles intertwine across disciplines.

For those with strong analytical skills, pairing your studies with a bachelor in mathematics online can strengthen your data analysis abilities—a valuable asset for research or policy careers. These related pathways allow you to tailor your education to fit your interests and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Andreas Kotsadam

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles