World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 63 2681 2456 1078 958 130 20913

Benjamin R. tenOever publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Benjamin R. tenOever between 2002 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Benjamin R. tenOever published across 25 years, from 2002 to 2026, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2021. 5 of the 177 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2021. 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 35 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 3 publications 2026: 2 publications
2002 2026

177 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Benjamin R. tenOever: publications per year, 2002 to 2026
Year Publications
2002 5
2003 4
2004 3
2005 2
2006 1
2007 1
2008 0
2009 3
2010 7
2011 3
2012 6
2013 7
2014 10
2015 4
2016 2
2017 6
2018 5
2019 4
2020 24
2021 35
2022 25
2023 12
2024 3
2025 3
2026 2
Total 177
Download as CSV

Benjamin R. tenOever publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin R. tenOever sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 125–134 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 130 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234 130
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Benjamin R. tenOever D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin R. tenOever sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144 63
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Benjamin R. tenOever is affiliated with the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focused on medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

The scientist's work notably addresses infectious diseases, molecular biology, immunology, neurology, and epidemiology. Key topics explored include SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research, COVID-19 clinical research studies, long-term effects of COVID-19, interferon and immune responses, CRISPR and genetic engineering, single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, and phagocytosis and immune regulation.

Benjamin R. tenOever has published extensively, with contributions to journals and platforms such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), SSRN Electronic Journal, Journal of Virology, Cell, and Cell Stem Cell. They have authored 29 papers in bioRxiv, 7 in SSRN Electronic Journal, 6 in Journal of Virology, 5 in Cell, and 3 in Cell Stem Cell.

Frequent coauthors include Robert E. Schwartz, Skyler Uhl, Yaron Bram, Benjamin E. Nilsson-Payant, and Daisy A. Hoagland.

Notable recent papers include:

  • Imbalanced Host Response to SARS-CoV-2 Drives Development of COVID-19, 2020, Cell
  • The Global Phosphorylation Landscape of SARS-CoV-2 Infection, 2020, Cell
  • A Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-based Platform to Study SARS-CoV-2 Tropism and Model Virus Infection in Human Cells and Organoids, 2020, Cell Stem Cell
  • Identification of Required Host Factors for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Human Cells, 2020, Cell
  • Identification of SARS-CoV-2 inhibitors using lung and colonic organoids, 2020, Nature

Best Publications

  • Imbalanced Host Response to SARS-CoV-2 Drives Development of COVID-19.

    Daniel Blanco-Melo;Benjamin E. Nilsson-Payant;Wen Chun Liu;Skyler Uhl

  • Triggering the Interferon Antiviral Response Through an IKK-Related Pathway

    Sonia Sharma;Benjamin R. tenOever;Nathalie Grandvaux;Guo-Ping Zhou

  • The Global Phosphorylation Landscape of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.

    Mehdi Bouhaddou;Danish Memon;Bjoern Meyer;Kris M. White

  • VSV strains with defects in their ability to shutdown innate immunity are potent systemic anti-cancer agents

    David F Stojdl;Brian D Lichty;Benjamin R tenOever;Jennifer M Paterson

  • Identification of Required Host Factors for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Human Cells.

    Zharko Daniloski;Tristan X. Jordan;Hans-Hermann Wessels;Daisy A. Hoagland

  • Transcriptional profiling of interferon regulatory factor 3 target genes: direct involvement in the regulation of interferon-stimulated genes.

    Nathalie Grandvaux;Marc J. Servant;Benjamin tenOever;Ganes C. Sen

  • Identification of SARS-CoV-2 inhibitors using lung and colonic organoids.

    Yuling Han;Xiaohua Duan;Xiaohua Duan;Liuliu Yang;Benjamin E. Nilsson-Payant

  • Multiple Functions of the IKK-Related Kinase IKKε in Interferon-Mediated Antiviral Immunity

    Benjamin R. tenOever;Sze-Ling Ng;Mark A. Chua;Sarah M. McWhirter

  • DAI Senses Influenza A Virus Genomic RNA and Activates RIPK3-Dependent Cell Death

    Roshan J. Thapa;Justin P. Ingram;Katherine B. Ragan;Shoko Nogusa

  • A human-airway-on-a-chip for the rapid identification of candidate antiviral therapeutics and prophylactics.

    Longlong Si;Haiqing Bai;Melissa Rodas;Wuji Cao

  • The interferon antiviral response: from viral invasion to evasion.

    Nathalie Grandvaux;Benjamin R tenOever;Marc J Servant;John Hiscott

  • Influenza A virus-generated small RNAs regulate the switch from transcription to replication

    Jasmine T. Perez;Andrew Varble;Ravi Sachidanandam;Ivan Zlatev

  • Identification of the Minimal Phosphoacceptor Site Required for in Vivo Activation of Interferon Regulatory Factor 3 in Response to Virus and Double-stranded RNA

    Marc J. Servant;Nathalie Grandvaux;Benjamin R. tenOever;Delphine Duguay

  • Genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 Screen Identifies Host Factors Essential for Influenza Virus Replication

    Julianna Han;Jasmine T. Perez;Cindy Chen;Yan Li

  • The Spike D614G mutation increases SARS-CoV-2 infection of multiple human cell types.

    Zharko Daniloski;Tristan X Jordan;Juliana K Ilmain;Xinyi Guo

  • Influenza A Virus Transmission Bottlenecks Are Defined by Infection Route and Recipient Host

    Andrew Varble;Randy A. Albrecht;Simone Backes;Marshall Crumiller

  • Activation of TBK1 and IKKε Kinases by Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Infection and the Role of Viral Ribonucleoprotein in the Development of Interferon Antiviral Immunity

    Benjamin R. tenOever;Sonia Sharma;Wen Zou;Qiang Sun

  • Recognition of the Measles Virus Nucleocapsid as a Mechanism of IRF-3 Activation

    Benjamin R. tenOever;Marc J. Servant;Nathalie Grandvaux;Rongtuan Lin

  • Leveraging the antiviral type I interferon system as a first line of defense against SARS-CoV-2 pathogenicity.

    Daisy A. Hoagland;Rasmus Møller;Skyler A. Uhl;Kohei Oishi

  • RNA viruses and the host microRNA machinery

    Benjamin R. tenOever

Frequent Co-Authors

Adolfo García-Sastre
Adolfo García-Sastre Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
David H. Sachs
David H. Sachs Columbia University
John Hiscott
John Hiscott Istituto Pasteur
Robert E. Schwartz
Robert E. Schwartz Cornell University
Shuibing Chen
Shuibing Chen Cornell University
Todd Evans
Todd Evans Cornell University
Randy A. Albrecht
Randy A. Albrecht Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Jean K. Lim
Jean K. Lim Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
David D. Ho
David D. Ho Columbia University
Rongtuan Lin
Rongtuan Lin McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers related to microbiology often involves broader fields in health sciences and medical support roles. Many students interested in healthcare opt for flexible study options like the fastest online medical billing and coding certificate programs, which offer quick entry points into the medical administrative sector.

For those aiming for clinical or research roles, understanding the variety of online medical programs available can be crucial. These programs provide options that complement a microbiology background, enabling specialization in fields like infectious diseases or public health.

Public health is another critical area linked to microbiology. Many students pursue an MPH degree, with a focus on disease prevention and epidemiology. Finding which online mph programs are easiest to get into can help streamline admission while gaining valuable skills for community health roles.

For those interested in patient interaction, learning about roles like a child life specialist can broaden career options. Discovering how much does a child life specialist make highlights the financial and emotional rewards of this profession, which complements a scientific background with compassionate care.

Best Scientists Citing Benjamin R. tenOever

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles