World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 43 7176 6691 3884 3530 104 9597

M. Anne Britt publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by M. Anne Britt between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. M. Anne Britt published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2012. 3 of the 117 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2012. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 7 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
1992 2025

117 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
M. Anne Britt: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 0
1994 3
1995 2
1996 1
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 0
2001 1
2002 2
2003 1
2004 4
2005 3
2006 0
2007 1
2008 4
2009 7
2010 3
2011 6
2012 15
2013 4
2014 5
2015 1
2016 7
2017 14
2018 8
2019 4
2020 5
2021 6
2022 3
2023 1
2024 2
2025 1
Total 117
Download as CSV

M. Anne Britt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Anne Britt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 104 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 104
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

M. Anne Britt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Anne Britt sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 43
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

M. Anne Britt is affiliated with Northern Illinois University in the United States. Their research predominantly spans the fields of psychology and social sciences, with a specific focus on developmental and educational psychology, education, sociology and political science, as well as experimental and cognitive psychology, and artificial intelligence.

The main topics addressed in Britt's work include educational strategies and epistemologies, education and critical thinking development, reading and literacy development, misinformation and its impacts, innovative teaching and learning methods, science education and pedagogy, and visual and cognitive learning processes.

The researcher has contributed to several academic venues, frequently publishing in:

  • Discourse Processes
  • Language and Linguistics Compass
  • Journal of Research in Reading
  • Reading and Writing
  • Instructional Science

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Britt include:

  • Jean-François Rouet
  • Jennifer Wiley
  • Gastón Saux
  • Nicolas Vibert
  • Amanda M. Durik

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Britt illustrate a focus on text comprehension, multiple document understanding, and reading processes in educational contexts:

  • Multiple Document Comprehension, 2020, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education
  • Building mental models from multiple texts: How readers construct coherence from inconsistent sources, 2021, Language and Linguistics Compass
  • Reading Contexts, Goals, and Decisions: Text Comprehension as a Situated Activity, 2022, Discourse Processes
  • Do you know what you are reading for? Exploring the effects of a task model enhancement on fifth graders' purposeful reading, 2021, Journal of Research in Reading
  • Effects of context and discrepancy when reading multiple documents, 2022, Reading and Writing

Best Publications

  • Improving Students' Ability to Identify and Use Source Information

    M. Anne Britt;Cindy Aglinskas

  • Toward a theory of documents representation.

    Charles A. Perfetti;Jean-François Rouet;M. Anne Britt

  • Disciplinary Literacies and Learning to Read for Understanding: A Conceptual Framework for Disciplinary Literacy.

    Susan R. Goldman;M. Anne Britt;Willard Brown;Gayle Cribb

  • The Role of Epistemic Beliefs in the Comprehension of Multiple Expository Texts: Toward an Integrated Model

    Ivar Bråten;M. Anne Britt;Helge I. Strømsø;Jean-François Rouet

  • Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history.

    Jean-François Rouet;M. Anne Britt;Robert A. Mason;Charles A. Perfetti

  • Relevance processes in multiple document comprehension.

    Jean-François Rouet;M. Anne Britt

  • Studying and Using Multiple Documents in History: Effects of Discipline Expertise

    Jean-François Rouet;Monik Favart;M. Anne Britt;Charles A. Perfetti

  • Trust Matters: Examining the Role of Source Evaluation in Students' Construction of Meaning Within and Across Multiple Texts

    Ivar Bråten;Helge I. Strømsø;M. Anne Britt

  • Text-based Learning and Reasoning: Studies in History

    Charles A. Perfetti;M. Anne Britt;Mara C. Georgi

  • Reading multiple texts about climate change: The relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension

    Helge I. Strømsø;Ivar Bråten;M. Anne Britt

  • RESOLV: Readers' Representation of Reading Contexts and Tasks.

    Jean-François Rouet;M. Anne Britt;Amanda M. Durik

  • Readers' use of source information in text comprehension

    Jason L. G. Braasch;Jean-François Rouet;Nicolas Vibert;M. Anne Britt

  • Scientific Literacy: The Role of Goal-Directed Reading and Evaluation in Understanding Scientific Information

    M. Anne Britt;Tobias Richter;Jean-François Rouet

  • Argumentation Schema and the Myside Bias in Written Argumentation

    Christopher R. Wolfe;M. Anne Britt;Jodie A. Butler

  • Parsing in discourse: Context effects and their limits

    M.Anne Britt;Charles A Perfetti;Simon Garrod;Keith Rayner

  • Enhancing the Quality of Learning: Learning with Multiple Documents

    M. Anne Britt;Jean-François Rouet

  • Literacy Beyond Text Comprehension: A Theory of Purposeful Reading

    M. Anne Britt;Jean-François Rouet;Amanda M. Durik

  • The locus of the myside bias in written argumentation

    Christopher R. Wolfe;M. Anne Britt

  • Spontaneous Sourcing among Students Reading Multiple Documents.

    Helge I. Strømsø;Ivar Bråten;M. Anne Britt;Leila E. Ferguson

  • Using Hypertext to Study and Reason About Historical Evidence

    M. Anne Britt;Jean-Fran~ois Rouet;Charles A. Perfetti

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean-François Rouet
Jean-François Rouet University of Poitiers
Charles A. Perfetti
Charles A. Perfetti University of Pittsburgh
Rainer Bromme
Rainer Bromme University of Münster
Helge I. Strømsø
Helge I. Strømsø University of Oslo
Ivar Bråten
Ivar Bråten University of Oslo
Jennifer Wiley
Jennifer Wiley University of Illinois at Chicago
Joseph P. Magliano
Joseph P. Magliano Georgia State University
Susan R. Goldman
Susan R. Goldman University of Illinois at Chicago
John J. Skowronski
John J. Skowronski Northern Illinois University
Arthur C. Graesser
Arthur C. Graesser University of Memphis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in Psychology grows, many students explore online degrees and flexible study options. Specializing in mental health counseling is a rewarding pathway that typically requires advanced education and proper certification. Depending on your location, the requirements can differ significantly. For example, you can learn how to become a mental health counselor in Fort Worth by meeting specific state criteria in education and practical experience.

If you're considering moving or practicing elsewhere, it's important to look into local guidelines. The Fremont mental health counselor education requirements and mental health counselor requirements in Fresno both offer valuable insights into California's standards for academic background and supervised clinical hours. Likewise, those interested in Texas certification can check the Garland mental health counselor certification requirements.

Before choosing an online degree or setting out on your counseling career, be sure to research the state-specific steps and select accredited programs that align with your goals and the pathways available in your region.

Best Scientists Citing M. Anne Britt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles