D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Psychology D-index 43 Citations 7,878 105 World Ranking 4265 National Ranking 2435

Research.com Recognitions

Awards & Achievements

2019 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

2010 - Fellow of the American Educational Research Association

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Linguistics
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Social science

Susan R. Goldman mainly focuses on Linguistics, Reading, Mathematics education, Reading comprehension and Comprehension. Her study in Linguistics is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Epistemology, Meaning and Cognitive science. In general Reading, her work in Learning to read is often linked to Need to know linking many areas of study.

Her work deals with themes such as Reliability and Learning disability, which intersect with Mathematics education. Her study looks at the relationship between Reading comprehension and fields such as Cognitive psychology, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems. The Comprehension study combines topics in areas such as Pronunciation, Social psychology, Orthography, Turkish and Task.

Her most cited work include:

  • The Construction of Mental Representations During Reading (289 citations)
  • Source Evaluation, Comprehension, and Learning in Internet Science Inquiry Tasks: (272 citations)
  • Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation (227 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Susan R. Goldman spends much of her time researching Reading, Linguistics, Mathematics education, Pedagogy and Reading comprehension. In her research, Text comprehension is intimately related to Natural language processing, which falls under the overarching field of Reading. The study incorporates disciplines such as Knowledge level and Primary education in addition to Linguistics.

Her Mathematics education research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Learning disability and Argumentation theory. Her Reading comprehension research incorporates elements of Cognitive psychology, Protocol analysis and Discourse analysis. Her research investigates the connection with Cognitive psychology and areas like Task which intersect with concerns in The Internet.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Reading (20.22%)
  • Linguistics (19.67%)
  • Mathematics education (19.13%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2014-2020)?

  • Reading (20.22%)
  • Pedagogy (18.58%)
  • Mathematics education (19.13%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Her primary areas of study are Reading, Pedagogy, Mathematics education, Linguistics and Reading comprehension. Susan R. Goldman focuses mostly in the field of Reading, narrowing it down to topics relating to Meaning and, in certain cases, Protocol analysis, Relation and Task analysis. Susan R. Goldman focuses mostly in the field of Pedagogy, narrowing it down to matters related to Discipline and, in some cases, Conceptual framework, Logical reasoning and Learning to read.

Her research in Mathematics education tackles topics such as Class which are related to areas like Close reading. Her research in Interpretation, Comprehension and Narrative are components of Linguistics. In her study, Verbal reasoning, Epistemic cognition and Cognitive psychology is strongly linked to Cognitive science, which falls under the umbrella field of Reading comprehension.

Between 2014 and 2020, her most popular works were:

  • Disciplinary Literacies and Learning to Read for Understanding: A Conceptual Framework for Disciplinary Literacy. (107 citations)
  • A Framework for Conceptualizing and Evaluating the Validity of Instructionally Relevant Assessments (71 citations)
  • Knowledge building in teacher professional learning communities: Focus of meeting matters (34 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Linguistics
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Social science

Her primary areas of investigation include Pedagogy, Learning sciences, Mathematics education, Reading and Teaching method. Her work on Pedagogy is being expanded to include thematically relevant topics such as English language. The concepts of her Learning sciences study are interwoven with issues in Curriculum & Instruction and Cooperative learning.

Her Mathematics education study combines topics in areas such as Class, Meaning, Argumentation theory and Close reading. Within one scientific family, she focuses on topics pertaining to Literacy under Reading, and may sometimes address concerns connected to Conceptual framework. Her Teaching method study typically links adjacent topics like Rhetoric.

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Structural Aspects of Constructing Meaning From Text

Susan R. Goldman;John A. Rakestraw.
(2000)

542 Citations

Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation

Nathalie Coté;Susan R. Goldman;Elizabeth U. Saul.
Discourse Processes (1998)

487 Citations

Source Evaluation, Comprehension, and Learning in Internet Science Inquiry Tasks:

Jennifer Wiley;Susan R. Goldman;Arthur C. Graesser;Christopher A. Sanchez.
American Educational Research Journal (2009)

451 Citations

Comprehending and Learning From Internet Sources: Processing Patterns of Better and Poorer Learners

Susan R. Goldman;Jason L.G. Braasch;Jennifer Wiley;Arthur C. Graesser.
Reading Research Quarterly (2012)

340 Citations

Reading Skill and the Identification of Words in Discourse Context.

Charles A. Perfetti;Susan R. Goldman;Thomas W. Hogaboam.
Memory & Cognition (1979)

331 Citations

Discourse Memory and Reading Comprehension Skill.

Charles A. Perfetti;Susan R. Goldman.
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior (1976)

295 Citations

The Construction of Mental Representations During Reading

Herre van Oostendorp;Susan R. Goldman.
(1998)

289 Citations

Relations between Adolescents' Text Processing and Reasoning.

Michael B. W. Wolfe;Susan R. Goldman.
Cognition and Instruction (2005)

289 Citations

Learning from text: Reflections on the past and suggestions for the future

Susan R. Goldman.
Discourse Processes (1997)

283 Citations

Extended Practice of Basic Addition Facts: Strategy Changes in Learning-Disabled Students

Susan R. Goldman;James W. Pellegrino;Davis L. Mertz.
Cognition and Instruction (1988)

263 Citations

Best Scientists Citing Susan R. Goldman

Ivar Bråten

Ivar Bråten

University of Oslo

Publications: 64

Paul van den Broek

Paul van den Broek

Leiden University

Publications: 61

Arthur C. Graesser

Arthur C. Graesser

University of Memphis

Publications: 47

Helge I. Strømsø

Helge I. Strømsø

University of Oslo

Publications: 45

Danielle S. McNamara

Danielle S. McNamara

Arizona State University

Publications: 45

Panayiota Kendeou

Panayiota Kendeou

University of Minnesota

Publications: 36

Jean-François Rouet

Jean-François Rouet

University of Poitiers

Publications: 36

Rainer Bromme

Rainer Bromme

University of Münster

Publications: 34

M. Anne Britt

M. Anne Britt

Northern Illinois University

Publications: 30

Patricia A. Alexander

Patricia A. Alexander

University of Maryland, College Park

Publications: 25

Joseph P. Magliano

Joseph P. Magliano

Georgia State University

Publications: 23

Charles A. Perfetti

Charles A. Perfetti

University of Pittsburgh

Publications: 22

David N. Rapp

David N. Rapp

Northwestern University

Publications: 22

Lynn S. Fuchs

Lynn S. Fuchs

Vanderbilt University

Publications: 21

Richard J. Shavelson

Richard J. Shavelson

Stanford University

Publications: 20

Profile was last updated on December 6th, 2021.
Research.com Ranking is based on data retrieved from the Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG).
The ranking d-index is inferred from publications deemed to belong to the considered discipline.

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us
Something went wrong. Please try again later.