World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
30
Citations
3692
World Ranking
11379
National Ranking
1106

Nigel Foreman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nigel Foreman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 102 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Nigel Foreman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nigel Foreman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nigel Foreman is affiliated with Middlesex University in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on psychology and engineering.

The main fields of study for this scientist include:

  • Psychology
  • Engineering

Within these broader areas, they concentrate on subfields such as:

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Automotive Engineering

Their work covers key topics including:

  • Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Child and Animal Learning Development

These topics reflect an interdisciplinary approach, merging psychological inquiry with applied engineering principles where relevant.

Nigel Foreman has contributed to the academic community through publications, although currently no specific recent papers or frequent co-authors are listed. There are also no available records of frequent publication venues or book publications at this time.

Best Publications

  • Object exploration and reactions to spatial and nonspatial changes in hooded rats following damage to parietal cortex or hippocampal formation.

    Etienne Save;Bruno Poucet;Nigel Foreman;Marie-Christine Buhot

  • Older people and outdoor environments: Pedestrian anxieties and barriers in the use of familiar and unfamiliar spaces

    Judith Phillips;Nigel Walford;Ann Hockey;Nigel Foreman

  • Exploratory activity and response to a spatial change in rats with hippocampal or posterior parietal cortical lesions

    Etienne Save;Marie-Christine Buhot;Nigel Foreman;Catherine Thinus-Blanc

  • Go-left go-right discrimination performance and distractibility following lesions of prefrontal cortex or superior colliculus in stumptail macaques

    A.D. Milner;N.P. Foreman;M.A. Goodale

  • Improving spatial functioning in children with cerebral palsy using computerized and traditional game tasks.

    Tat'yana Akhutina;Nigel Foreman;Anatoly Krichevets;Leena Matikka

  • Relationships between the superior colliculus and hippocampus: Neural and behavioral considerations.

    Nigel Foreman;Robin Stevens

  • Uses of virtual reality in clinical training: developing the spatial skills of children with mobility impairments.

    Danaë Stanton;Nigel Foreman;Paul N. Wilson

  • High doses of caffeine impair performance of a numerical version of the Stroop task in men

    Nigel Foreman;Sue Barraclough;Catherine Moore;Anita Mehta

  • Spatial memory in preschool infants

    Nigel P. Foreman;Margaret Arber;Joe Savage

  • Algorithmic responding on the radial maze in rats does not always imply absence of spatial encoding

    Nigel Foreman

  • Locomotion, active choice, and spatial memory in children.

    Nigel Foreman;Denny Foreman;Alison Cummings;Sandra Owens

  • Spatial information transfer from virtual to real versions of the Kiel locomotor maze.

    Nigel Foreman;Jonathan Stirk;Johannes Pohl;Lars Mandelkow

  • Spatial knowledge of a real school environment acquired from virtual or physical models by able-bodied children and children with physical disabilities.

    Nigel Foreman;Danae Stanton;Paul N. Wilson;Hester E. Duffy

  • Transfer of Spatial Knowledge to a Two-Level Shopping Mall in Older People, Following Virtual Exploration

    Nigel Foreman;Danae Stanton-Fraser;Paul N. Wilson;Hester Duffy

  • Visual search, perception, and visual-motor skill in "healthy" children born at 27-32 weeks' gestation.

    Nigel Foreman;Alistair Fielder;Catrin Minshell;Elizabeth Hurrion

  • Variants of the Morris water maze task to comparatively assess human and rodent place navigation.

    Robby Schoenfeld;Thomas Schiffelholz;Christian Beyer;Bernd Leplow

  • The development of exploration and spontaneous alternation in hooded rat pups: effects of unusually early eyelid opening.

    Nigel Foreman;Mohammad Altaha

  • Ageing and spatial reversal learning in humans: findings from a virtual water maze.

    R. Schoenfeld;N. Foreman;B. Leplow

  • Effects of early mobility on shortcut performance in a simulated maze

    Danaë Stanton;Paul N Wilson;Nigel Foreman

  • Can virtual environments enhance the learning of historical chronology

    Nigel Foreman;Stephen Boyd-Davis;Magnus Moar;Liliya Korallo

  • Spatial awareness in seven to 11‐year‐old physically handicapped children in mainstream schools

    Nigel Foreman;Claire Orencas;Eve Nicholas;Pamela Morton

  • Behavioural Treatment Programs and Selectivity of Speaking at Follow‐Up in a Sample of 25 Selective Mutes

    Alice Sluckin;Nigel Foreman;Martin Herbert

  • VR and spatial awareness in disabled children

    Nigel Foreman;Paul Wilson;Danae Stanton

  • Virtual Reality in Psychology

    Nigel Foreman

Frequent Co-Authors

Etienne Save
Etienne Save Aix-Marseille University
Bruno Poucet
Bruno Poucet Aix-Marseille University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online degree in psychology opens doors to diverse and rewarding career pathways, including counseling, therapy, and mental health services. As the demand for qualified mental health professionals continues to grow, students are increasingly seeking flexible and affordable study options.

Cost is a key consideration when choosing a program. Thankfully, there are resources highlighting the affordable counseling degrees in Saint Louis, as well as listings of the cheapest counseling programs in Saint Paul. If you're looking to study on the West Coast, you can also review the most affordable counseling degree programs in San Diego. The Pacific Northwest is another popular destination, with several affordable counseling programs in Seattle that are worth considering.

Choosing the right online psychology or counseling pathway depends on your career goals, budget, and preferred learning style. By researching affordable and accredited programs, students can start on a meaningful journey toward making a difference in the field of mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Nigel Foreman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles