World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
John Trachtenberg

John Trachtenberg

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
20538
World Ranking
16790
National Ranking
703

John Trachtenberg publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Trachtenberg sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 359 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John Trachtenberg D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Trachtenberg sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

John Trachtenberg is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and has contributed to the field of Medicine, with a focus on multiple subfields including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology, Rheumatology, Physiology, and General Health Professions. Their research primarily centers on topics related to prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment, cancer survivorship and care, prostate cancer treatment and research, urologic and reproductive health conditions, COVID-19 and healthcare impacts, physical activity and health, and health and wellbeing research.

Their recent publications include:

  • Role of multiparametric MRI in long-term surveillance following focal laser ablation of prostate cancer, 2021, British Journal of Radiology
  • Associations between self-reported physical activity, quality of life, and emotional well-being in men with prostate cancer on active surveillance, 2020, Psycho-Oncology
  • Associations Between Physical Activity, Quality Of Life And Emotional Well-being During Active Surveillance For Prostate Cancer, 2020, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

John Trachtenberg has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Antonio Finelli (3 publications)
  • Efthymios Papadopoulos (2 publications)
  • Shabbir M.H. Alibhai (2 publications)
  • Isabelle Doré (2 publications)
  • Andrew Matthew (2 publications)

Their work has been published in journals such as:

  • British Journal of Radiology
  • Psycho-Oncology
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Throughout their career, John Trachtenberg's research has emphasized the integration of clinical methods with physical activity metrics and quality of life assessments, especially in the context of prostate cancer active surveillance.

They were awarded the distinction of Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation in 2005.

Best Publications

  • Increasing hospital admission rates for urological complications after transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.

    Robert K. Nam;Robert K. Nam;Refik Saskin;Yuna Lee;Ying Liu

  • Combined T2-Weighted and Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Localization of Prostate Cancer

    Masoom A. Haider;Theodorus H. van der Kwast;Jeff Tanguay;Andrew J. Evans

  • Screening for prostate cancer. A decision analytic view.

    Murray D. Krahn;John E. Mahoney;Mark H. Eckman;John Trachtenberg

  • Prostate cancer detection with multi-parametric MRI: logistic regression analysis of quantitative T2, diffusion-weighted imaging, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

    Deanna L. Langer;Theodorus H. van der Kwast PhD;Andrew J. Evans PhD;CM John Trachtenberg Md;CM John Trachtenberg Md

  • Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Critical Appraisal of Rationale and Modalities

    Scott E. Eggener;Peter T. Scardino;Peter R. Carroll;Michael J. Zelefsky

  • The role of focal therapy in the management of localised prostate cancer: a systematic review

    Massimo Valerio;Massimo Valerio;Hashim U Ahmed;Mark Emberton;Nathan L Lawrentschuk

  • Effect of total-body prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    D. Santa Mina;D. Santa Mina;H. Clarke;H. Clarke;P. Ritvo;P. Ritvo;Y.W. Leung;Y.W. Leung

  • Expression of the TMPRSS2:ERG fusion gene predicts cancer recurrence after surgery for localised prostate cancer.

    Nam Rk;Sugar L;Yang W;Srivastava S

  • Image guided photothermal focal therapy for localized prostate cancer: phase I trial.

    U. Lindner;R.A. Weersink;M.A. Haider;M.R. Gertner

  • Prostate tissue composition and MR measurements: investigating the relationships between ADC, T2, K(trans), v(e), and corresponding histologic features.

    Deanna L Langer;Theodorus H van der Kwast;Andrew J Evans;Anna Plotkin

  • Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for localization of recurrent prostate cancer after external beam radiotherapy.

    Masoom A. Haider;Peter Chung;Joan Sweet;Ants Toi

  • The Uncertainty Of Radio Frequency Treatment Of Renal Cell Carcinoma: Findings At Immediate And Delayed Nephrectomy

    Ricardo A. Rendon;John R. Kachura;Joan M. Sweet;Mark R. Gertner

  • Intermixed normal tissue within prostate cancer: effect on MR imaging measurements of apparent diffusion coefficient and T2--sparse versus dense cancers.

    Deanna L. Langer;Theodorus H. Van Der Kwast;Andrew J. Evans;Laibao Sun

  • Techniques for delivery and monitoring of TOOKAD (WST09)-mediated photodynamic therapy of the prostate: clinical experience and practicalities.

    Robert A. Weersink;Arjen Bogaards;Mark Gertner;Sean R.H. Davidson

  • Vascular Targeted Photodynamic Therapy With Palladium-Bacteriopheophorbide Photosensitizer for Recurrent Prostate Cancer Following Definitive Radiation Therapy: Assessment of Safety and Treatment Response

    J. Trachtenberg;A. Bogaards;R.A. Weersink;M.A. Haider

  • Do Older Men Benefit From Curative Therapy of Localized Prostate Cancer

    Shabbir M.H. Alibhai;Gary Naglie;Robert Nam;John Trachtenberg

  • Effect of the dual 5α-reductase inhibitor dutasteride on markers of tumor regression in prostate cancer

    Gerald L. Andriole;Peter Humphrey;Paul Ray;Martin E. Gleave

  • 'Prostatic evasive anterior tumours': the role of magnetic resonance imaging

    Nathan Lawrentschuk;Masoom A. Haider;Nikhil Daljeet;Andrew Evans

  • Correlation of Prostatic Nuclear Androgen Receptor Content with Duration of Response and Survival Following Hormonal Therapy in Advanced Prostatic Cancer

    John Trachtenberg;Patrick C. Walsh

  • Impact of Multiparametric Endorectal Coil Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Disease Reclassification Among Active Surveillance Candidates: A Prospective Cohort Study

    David Margel;Stanley A. Yap;Nathan Lawrentschuk;Laurence Klotz

Frequent Co-Authors

Neil Fleshner
Neil Fleshner Princess Margaret Cancer Centre
Antonio Finelli
Antonio Finelli University Health Network
Michael A.S. Jewett
Michael A.S. Jewett University of Toronto
Alexandre R. Zlotta
Alexandre R. Zlotta University Health Network
Steven A. Narod
Steven A. Narod University of Toronto
Theodorus H. van der Kwast
Theodorus H. van der Kwast University Health Network
Laurence Klotz
Laurence Klotz University of Toronto
Andrew Evans
Andrew Evans University of Dundee
Nathan Lawrentschuk
Nathan Lawrentschuk University of Melbourne
Aaron Fenster
Aaron Fenster University of Western Ontario

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medicine offers many rewarding careers, and not all of them require attending medical school. Prospective healthcare professionals can pursue a variety of rn to fnp bridge programs, which enable registered nurses to advance to family nurse practitioner roles through flexible online study. These bridge programs can save time and make career advancement more accessible.

For those interested in nutrition and preventative care, many accredited schools now offer online nutrition degree programs. These degrees can lead to careers in clinical settings, wellness centers, or the growing field of dietetics.

Healthcare management is another strong pathway. Choosing accredited mha programs online allows you to prepare for leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations—all with the convenience of remote learning.

Some universities also provide an rn to bsn online without clinicals option, reducing barriers for working nurses looking to expand their credentials. This can be an efficient way to upgrade qualifications without interrupting your current job.

Exploring these related online degrees and career pathways offers flexibility and opens doors to diverse roles in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing John Trachtenberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles