World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9526 8908 653 613 75 5415

Brett Q. Ford publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Brett Q. Ford between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Brett Q. Ford published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 5.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2014. 8 of the 88 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2014. 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 0 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 5 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 5 publications
2009 2025

88 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Brett Q. Ford: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 1
2010 1
2011 0
2012 5
2013 8
2014 12
2015 6
2016 1
2017 5
2018 3
2019 6
2020 7
2021 12
2022 8
2023 5
2024 3
2025 5
Total 88
Download as CSV

Brett Q. Ford publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brett Q. Ford sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 75 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 75
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Brett Q. Ford D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brett Q. Ford sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Brett Q. Ford is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their research primarily spans the field of Psychology, with a total of 59 publications.

Their work covers several subfields of study including:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Main topics of their research include:

  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Brett Q. Ford has published papers in several frequent venues, reflecting their research focus. These include:

  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
  • Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
  • Psychological Science
  • Affective Science
  • Emotion

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Brett Q. Ford are:

  • "White fragility: An emotion regulation perspective." (2022), American Psychologist
  • "The political is personal: The costs of daily politics." (2023), Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Other significant recent publications they contributed to include:

  • "The Future of Women in Psychological Science" (2020), Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • "Self-control: An integrative framework" (2023), Social and Personality Psychology Compass
  • "Rethinking reappraisal: The double-edged sword of regulating negative emotions in the workplace" (2020), Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Brett Q. Ford collaborates frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Emily C Willroth
  • Amanda J. Shallcross
  • Matthew Feinberg
  • Angela M. Smith
  • Iulia Niculescu

Best Publications

  • Why Beliefs About Emotion Matter: An Emotion-Regulation Perspective:

    Brett Q. Ford;James J. Gross

  • The psychological health benefits of accepting negative emotions and thoughts: Laboratory, diary, and longitudinal evidence.

    Brett Q. Ford;Phoebe Lam;Oliver P. John;Iris B. Mauss

  • When feeling bad is expected to be good: Emotion regulation and outcome expectancies in social conflicts.

    Maya Tamir;Brett Q. Ford

  • Culture and emotion regulation.

    Brett Q Ford;Iris B Mauss

  • Culture shapes whether the pursuit of happiness predicts higher or lower well-being.

    Brett Q. Ford;Julia Dmitrieva;Daniel Heller;Yulia E. Chentsova-Dutton

  • Reappraisal Reconsidered: A Closer Look at the Costs of an Acclaimed Emotion-Regulation Strategy:

    Brett Q. Ford;Allison S. Troy

  • Getting better with age: The relationship between age, acceptance, and negative affect.

    Amanda J. Shallcross;Brett Q. Ford;Victoria A. Floerke;Iris B. Mauss

  • Choosing to be afraid: preferences for fear as a function of goal pursuit.

    Maya Tamir;Brett Q. Ford

  • Broadening Our Field of View: The Role of Emotion Polyregulation:

    Brett Q. Ford;James J. Gross;June Gruber

  • DESPERATELY SEEKING HAPPINESS: VALUING HAPPINESS IS ASSOCIATED WITH SYMPTOMS AND DIAGNOSIS OF DEPRESSION.

    Brett Q. Ford;Amanda J. Shallcross;Iris B. Mauss;Victoria A. Floerke

  • Emotion Regulation: Why Beliefs Matter

    Brett Q. Ford;James J. Gross

  • The cost of believing emotions are uncontrollable: Youths’ beliefs about emotion predict emotion regulation and depressive symptoms

    Brett Q. Ford;Sandy J. Lwi;Amy L. Gentzler;Benjamin Hankin

  • Should people pursue feelings that feel good or feelings that do good? Emotional preferences and well-being.

    Maya Tamir;Brett Q. Ford

  • Change the things you can: Emotion regulation is more beneficial for people from lower than from higher socioeconomic status.

    Allison S. Troy;Brett Q. Ford;Kateri McRae;Pareezad Zarolia

  • Poor caregiver mental health predicts mortality of patients with neurodegenerative disease.

    Sandy J. Lwi;Brett Q. Ford;James J. Casey;Bruce L. Miller

  • When getting angry is smart: emotional preferences and emotional intelligence

    Brett Q Ford;Maya Tamir

  • Too much of a good thing? Cardiac vagal tone's nonlinear relationship with well-being.

    Aleksandr Kogan;June Gruber;Amanda J. Shallcross;Brett Q. Ford

  • The Future of Women in Psychological Science

    June Gruber;Jane Mendle;Kristen A. Lindquist;Toni Schmader

  • High cardiac vagal control is related to better subjective and objective sleep quality

    Gabriela G. Werner;Brett Q. Ford;Iris B. Mauss;Manuel Schabus

  • Valuing happiness is associated with bipolar disorder.

    Brett Q. Ford;Iris B. Mauss;June Gruber

  • Keeping Your Eyes on the Prize Anger and Visual Attention to Threats and Rewards

    Brett Q. Ford;Maya Tamir;Tad T. Brunyé;Tad T. Brunyé;William R. Shirer;William R. Shirer

  • THE PARADOXICAL EFFECTS OF PURSUING POSITIVE EMOTION When and Why Wanting to Feel Happy Backfi res

    Brett Q. Ford;Iris B. Mauss

Frequent Co-Authors

Iris B. Mauss
Iris B. Mauss University of California, Berkeley
Maya Tamir
Maya Tamir Hebrew University of Jerusalem
James J. Gross
James J. Gross Stanford University
Matthew Feinberg
Matthew Feinberg University of Toronto
June Gruber
June Gruber University of Colorado Boulder
Frank H. Wilhelm
Frank H. Wilhelm University of Salzburg
Kateri McRae
Kateri McRae University of Denver
Tad T. Brunyé
Tad T. Brunyé Tufts University
Jens Blechert
Jens Blechert University of Salzburg
Benjamin L. Hankin
Benjamin L. Hankin University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology programs opens up numerous pathways for flexible learning and varied career opportunities. Many universities now offer fully online psychology degrees, making higher education more accessible to students nationwide. Whether you’re looking for the easiest psychology degrees online in the Midwest or searching for programs in other regions, there are options designed to fit different needs and schedules.

Regional availability can play a big role in your decision. Students in Texas, for example, can explore some of the easiest online psychology degree programs in Texas, with leading institutions offering streamlined curriculums. If you’re located in San Antonio, you may be interested in the top San Antonio easiest psychology degrees online, which cater specifically to local and remote learners alike.

Beyond Texas and the Midwest, the easiest psychology degrees online in the South provide additional flexible options. Graduates of online psychology programs can pursue careers in counseling, mental health services, human resources, and more. With so many accredited online degrees now available, students can find an educational path that supports their professional aspirations wherever they live.

Best Scientists Citing Brett Q. Ford

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles