World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 6825 6359 3702 3363 85 13116

Jeanne L. Tsai publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jeanne L. Tsai between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jeanne L. Tsai published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2024. 14 of the 105 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2024. 1997: 3 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 5 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 2 publications
1997 2025

105 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jeanne L. Tsai: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 3
1998 0
1999 0
2000 6
2001 3
2002 6
2003 2
2004 5
2005 1
2006 5
2007 11
2008 0
2009 1
2010 2
2011 3
2012 0
2013 3
2014 5
2015 3
2016 7
2017 6
2018 3
2019 3
2020 3
2021 4
2022 1
2023 5
2024 12
2025 2
Total 105
Download as CSV

Jeanne L. Tsai publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeanne L. Tsai sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 85 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 85
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Jeanne L. Tsai D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeanne L. Tsai sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jeanne L. Tsai is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States and specializes primarily in psychology. Their research spans multiple subfields including social psychology, sociology and political science, general health professions, experimental and cognitive psychology, and cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist's work focuses on several main topics such as cultural differences and values, social and intergroup psychology, social media and politics, misinformation and its impacts, face recognition and perception, behavioral health and interventions, and psychological well-being and life satisfaction.

Recent publications by Jeanne L. Tsai include:

  • "The rise of affectivism", 2021, published in Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Social media users produce more affect that supports cultural values, but are more influenced by affect that violates cultural values.", 2021, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • "Association between age and intellectual curiosity: the mediating roles of future time perspective and importance of curiosity", 2020, European Journal of Ageing
  • "Embedding Societal Values into Social Media Algorithms", 2023, Journal of Online Trust and Safety
  • "Why does passion matter more in individualistic cultures?", 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several researchers including Brian Knutson, Chenyan Jia, Hazel Rose Markus, Michael Ko, and Jeffrey T. Hancock.

Jeanne L. Tsai's publications have appeared in various academic venues, with repeated contributions to journals such as Emotion, Gothic.net, and arXiv (Cornell University), alongside single contributions to prominent outlets like Nature Human Behaviour and the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

Best Publications

  • Emotion and aging: experience, expression, and control.

    James J. Gross;Laura L. Carstensen;Monisha Pasupathi;Jeanne Tsai

  • Cultural variation in affect valuation.

    Jeanne L. Tsai;Brian Knutson;Helene H. Fung

  • Ideal Affect: Cultural Causes and Behavioral Consequences:

    Jeanne L. Tsai

  • The Meaning of “Being Chinese” and “Being American” Variation among Chinese American Young Adults

    Jeanne L. Tsai;Yu-Wen Ying;Peter A. Lee

  • Buddhist and Psychological Perspectives on Emotions and Well-Being

    Paul Ekman;Richard J. Davidson;Matthieu Ricard;B. Alan Wallace

  • Learning What Feelings to Desire: Socialization of Ideal Affect Through Children's Storybooks

    Jeanne L. Tsai;Jennifer Y. Louie;Eva E. Chen;Yukiko Uchida

  • Cultural models of shame and guilt.

    Ying Wong;Jeanne Tsai

  • Autonomic, subjective, and expressive responses to emotional films in older and younger Chinese Americans and European Americans.

    Jeanne L. Tsai;Robert W. Levenson;Laura L. Carstensen

  • Cultural Influences on Emotional Responding Chinese American and European American Dating Couples During Interpersonal Conflict

    Jeanne L. Tsai;Robert W. Levenson

  • Influence and adjustment goals: sources of cultural differences in ideal affect.

    Jeanne L. Tsai;Felicity F. Miao;Emma Seppala;Helene H. Fung

  • The emotional integration of childhood experience: physiological, facial expressive, and self-reported emotional response during the adult attachment interview.

    Glenn I. Roisman;Jeanne L. Tsai;Kuan Hiong Sylvia Chiang

  • Emotional expression and physiology in European Americans and Hmong Americans.

    Jeanne L. Tsai;Yulia Chentsova-Dutton;Liliana Freire-Bebeau;Diane E. Przymus

  • Good Feelings in Christianity and Buddhism: Religious Differences in Ideal Affect

    Jeanne L. Tsai;Felicity F. Miao;Emma Seppala

  • Cultural and temperamental variation in emotional response.

    Jeanne L. Tsai;Robert W. Levenson;Kimberly McCoy

  • Self-focused attention and emotional reactivity: the role of culture.

    Yulia E. Chentsova-Dutton;Jeanne L. Tsai

  • Cultural predictors of self-esteem: a study of Chinese American female and male young adults.

    Jeanne L. Tsai;Yu-Wen Ying;Peter Allen Lee

  • CULTURAL ORIENTATION AND RACIAL DISCRIMINATION: PREDICTORS OF COHERENCE IN CHINESE AMERICAN YOUNG ADULTS

    Yu-Wen Ying;Peter A. Lee;Jeanne L. Tsai

  • Why and how we should study ethnic identity, acculturation, and cultural orientation.

    Jeanne L. Tsai;Yulia Chentsova-Dutton;Ying Wong

  • Striving to Feel Good: Ideal Affect, Actual Affect, and Their Correspondence Across Adulthood

    Susanne Scheibe;Tammy English;Jeanne L. Tsai;Laura L. Carstensen

  • Wanting to maximize the positive and minimize the negative: Implications for mixed affective experience in American and Chinese contexts

    Tamara Sims;Jeanne L. Tsai;Da Jiang;Yaheng Wang

Frequent Co-Authors

Helene H. Fung
Helene H. Fung Chinese University of Hong Kong
Brian Knutson
Brian Knutson Stanford University
Laura L. Carstensen
Laura L. Carstensen Stanford University
Robert W. Levenson
Robert W. Levenson University of California, Berkeley
Yukiko Uchida
Yukiko Uchida Kyoto University
James J. Gross
James J. Gross Stanford University
Susanne Scheibe
Susanne Scheibe University of Groningen
Ian H. Gotlib
Ian H. Gotlib Stanford University
James N. Butcher
James N. Butcher University of Minnesota
Ricardo F. Muñoz
Ricardo F. Muñoz Palo Alto University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens up a wide range of career pathways in mental health counseling across the United States. Many students opt for flexible online programs to prepare for licensure and specialized roles, which allow them to balance studies with work or family commitments.

Educational and certification requirements for counselors vary by location. For example, those hoping to become a mental health counselor in Lubbock must complete a state-approved graduate program and meet supervised experience standards. If your goal is to fulfill Madison mental health counselor certification requirements, you’ll also need to navigate specific state exams and background checks.

In regions such as Memphis, aspiring professionals must stay informed about changes to mental health counselor requirements in Memphis, including graduate coursework and practical training. Similarly, understanding the Mesa mental health counselor education requirements is vital for obtaining licensure in Arizona. Always research your state’s latest standards and choose accredited online degrees to ensure a smooth path toward your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Jeanne L. Tsai

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles