World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
49
Citations
13013
World Ranking
5591
National Ranking
3051

Daniel Casasanto publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Casasanto sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 195 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Daniel Casasanto D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Casasanto sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel Casasanto is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and neuroscience, with a focus on experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, cognitive neuroscience, developmental and educational psychology, and statistics and probability.

Their work addresses several main topics including action observation and synchronization, language, metaphor, and cognition, cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, hearing impairment and communication, multisensory perception and integration, cultural differences and values, and categorization, perception, and language.

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Casasanto are the following:

  • "Temporal focus and time spatialization across cultures" (2020), published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  • "Hidden Differences in Phenomenal Experience" (2023), published in Cognitive Science
  • "Spatial concepts of number, size, and time in an indigenous culture" (2021), published in Science Advances
  • "Spatial metaphors and the design of everyday things" (2022), published in Frontiers in Psychology
  • "Unconscious Number Discrimination in the Human Visual System" (2020), published in Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento)

Casasanto has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Susan Goldin-Meadow (5 co-authored papers), Julio Santiago (4 papers), Benjamin Pitt (4 papers), Carmen Callizo-Romero (3 papers), and Slavica Tutnjević (3 papers).

The scientist's publications appear repeatedly in several venues, with multiple contributions to Cognitive Science, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, Frontiers in Psychology, and the Journal of Experimental Psychology General, as well as publications in Science Advances.

Best Publications

  • Time in the mind: Using space to think about time

    Daniel Casasanto;Daniel Casasanto;Lera Boroditsky

  • Embodiment of abstract concepts: good and bad in right- and left-handers.

    Daniel Casasanto;Daniel Casasanto

  • Different Bodies, Different Minds The Body Specificity of Language and Thought

    Daniel Casasanto;Daniel Casasanto

  • Who's Afraid of the Big Bad Whorf? Crosslinguistic Differences in Temporal Language and Thought

    Daniel Casasanto

  • Motor action and emotional memory

    Daniel Casasanto;Katinka Dijkstra

  • Structural integration in language and music: evidence for a shared system.

    Evelina G. Fedorenko;Aniruddh Patel;Daniel Casasanto;Jonathan Winawer

  • Body-Specific Representations of Action Verbs Neural Evidence From Right- and Left-Handers

    Roel M. Willems;Peter Hagoort;Daniel Casasanto

  • When Left Is “Right” Motor Fluency Shapes Abstract Concepts

    Daniel Casasanto;Evangelia G. Chrysikou

  • The Hands of Time: Temporal gestures in English speakers

    Daniel Casasanto;Kyle Jasmin

  • Functional MRI predicts post-surgical memory following temporal lobectomy

    Marcie L. Rabin;Veena M. Narayan;Daniel Y. Kimberg;Daniel J. Casasanto

  • Mirror reading can reverse the flow of time.

    Daniel Casasanto;Roberto Bottini

  • Space and Time in the Child's Mind: Evidence for a Cross-Dimensional Asymmetry

    Daniel Casasanto;Olga Fotakopoulou;Lera Boroditsky

  • The Thickness of Musical Pitch Psychophysical Evidence for Linguistic Relativity

    Sarah Dolscheid;Shakila Shayan;Asifa Majid;Daniel Casasanto

  • Similarity and proximity: When does close in space mean close in mind?

    Daniel Casasanto

  • Good and Bad in the Hands of Politicians: Spontaneous Gestures during Positive and Negative Speech

    Daniel Casasanto;Kyle Jasmin

  • When You Think About It, Your Past Is in Front of You How Culture Shapes Spatial Conceptions of Time

    Juanma de la Fuente;Julio Santiago;Antonio Román;Cristina Dumitrache

  • Neural dissociations between action verb understanding and motor imagery

    Roel M. Willems;Roel M. Willems;Ivan Toni;Peter Hagoort;Daniel Casasanto

  • Flexibility in Embodied Language Understanding

    Roel M. Willems;Daniel Casasanto;Daniel Casasanto;Daniel Casasanto

  • A Functional Role for the Motor System in Language Understanding: Evidence From Theta-Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

    Roel M. Willems;Roel M. Willems;Ludovica Labruna;Ludovica Labruna;Ludovica Labruna;Mark D'Esposito;Richard Ivry;Richard Ivry

  • Do monkeys think in metaphors? Representations of space and time in monkeys and humans

    Dustin J. Merritt;Daniel Casasanto;Elizabeth M. Brannon

Frequent Co-Authors

Roel M. Willems
Roel M. Willems Radboud University
Peter Hagoort
Peter Hagoort Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics
John A. Detre
John A. Detre University of Pennsylvania
Lera Boroditsky
Lera Boroditsky University of California, San Diego
William D.S. Killgore
William D.S. Killgore University of Arizona
Richard B. Ivry
Richard B. Ivry University of California, Berkeley
Asifa Majid
Asifa Majid University of York
Guila Glosser
Guila Glosser University of Pennsylvania
Joseph A. Maldjian
Joseph A. Maldjian The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
David C. Alsop
David C. Alsop Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens the doors to diverse online options and related career pathways, especially in social work, counseling, and human services. Many students interested in psychology choose to pursue social work, as it provides an opportunity to directly support individuals and communities.

If affordability is a concern, there are several program options to consider. For those in Illinois, some of the cheapest social work degrees in Chicago provide excellent training while helping you minimize student debt. In Ohio, you can explore the most affordable social work degree programs in Columbus, making it easier to begin your career with financial stability.

Distance learners in Texas can benefit from the most affordable social work degree programs in Denton, which offer accessible pathways to licensure and employment. Similarly, those considering studying in the Southeast can explore affordable social work degrees in Florida.

Whether you focus on clinical, educational, or community settings, studying psychology or social work online can lead to rewarding careers and meaningful impact on society.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Casasanto

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles