World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 40 8340 7791 373 359 139 4877

Sabine Hunnius publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sabine Hunnius between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sabine Hunnius published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 8.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2025. 30 of the 184 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2025. 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 5 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 18 publications
2004 2025

184 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sabine Hunnius: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 3
2005 2
2006 1
2007 1
2008 5
2009 2
2010 4
2011 10
2012 6
2013 7
2014 4
2015 15
2016 7
2017 10
2018 10
2019 16
2020 14
2021 10
2022 14
2023 13
2024 12
2025 18
Total 184
Download as CSV

Sabine Hunnius publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sabine Hunnius sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 139 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 139
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Sabine Hunnius D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sabine Hunnius sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 40
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Sabine Hunnius is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Neuroscience, with a notable focus on Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental and Educational Psychology. Other areas of interest include Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Clinical Psychology.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, including:

  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Psychological and Educational Research Studies
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Language Development and Disorders

Sabine Hunnius has contributed to numerous publications, often appearing in these venues:

  • Developmental Science
  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
  • Infant Behavior and Development
  • Science Advances

They have collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Marlene Meyer, Francesco Poli, Rogier B. Mars, Emma Kate Ward, and Jan K. Buitelaar.

Some of the recent papers by Sabine Hunnius are:

  • Infants tailor their attention to maximize learning, 2020, Science Advances
  • Enhancing reproducibility in developmental EEG research: BIDS, cluster-based permutation tests, and effect sizes, 2021, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Contributions of expected learning progress and perceptual novelty to curiosity-driven exploration, 2022, Cognition
  • How infant-directed actions enhance infants' attention, learning, and exploration: Evidence from EEG and computational modeling, 2022, Developmental Science
  • Curiosity and the dynamics of optimal exploration, 2024, Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Best Publications

  • You'll never crawl alone: Neurophysiological evidence for experience-dependent motor resonance in infancy

    M. van Elk;H.T. van Schie;S. Hunnius;C. Vesper

  • Developmental Changes in Visual Scanning of Dynamic Faces and Abstract Stimuli in Infants: A Longitudinal Study

    Sabine Hunnius;Reint H. Geuze

  • Imitation in infancy: Rational or motor resonance?

    Markus Paulus;Sabine Hunnius;Marlies Vissers;Harold Bekkering

  • The Early Development of Object Knowledge: A Study of Infants' Visual Anticipations During Action Observation

    Sabine Hunnius;Harold Bekkering

  • Prelinguistic Infants Are Sensitive to Space-Pitch Associations Found Across Cultures

    Sarah Dolscheid;Sarah Dolscheid;Sabine Hunnius;Daniel Casasanto;Asifa Majid

  • Facing threat: Infants' and adults' visual scanning of faces with neutral, happy, sad, angry, and fearful emotional expressions

    Sabine Hunnius;Tessa C. J. de Wit;Sven Vrins;Claes von Hofsten

  • What are you doing? How active and observational experience shape infants' action understanding

    Sabine Hunnius;Harold Bekkering

  • Motor activation during observation of unusual versus ordinary actions in infancy.

    Janny C. Stapel;Sabine Hunnius;Michiel van Elk;Harold Bekkering

  • How learning to shake a rattle affects 8-month-old infants' perception of the rattle's sound: Electrophysiological evidence for action-effect binding in infancy

    Markus Paulus;Sabine Hunnius;Michiel van Elk;Harold Bekkering

  • Infants tailor their attention to maximize learning

    F. Poli;G. Serino;G. Serino;R. B. Mars;R. B. Mars;S. Hunnius

  • The role of frequency information and teleological reasoning in infants' and adults' action prediction.

    Markus Paulus;Sabine Hunnius;Carolien van Wijngaarden;Sven Vrins

  • Enhancing reproducibility in developmental EEG research: BIDS, cluster-based permutation tests, and effect sizes.

    Marlene Meyer;Didi Lamers;Ezgi Kayhan;Sabine Hunnius

  • Gaze shifting in infancy: a longitudinal study using dynamic faces and abstract stimuli

    Sabine Hunnius;Reint H. Geuze

  • Bridging the gap between the other and me: the functional role of motor resonance and action effects in infants’ imitation

    Markus Paulus;Sabine Hunnius;Marlies Vissers;Harold Bekkering

  • Online prediction of others’ actions: the contribution of the target object, action context and movement kinematics

    Janny C. Stapel;Sabine Hunnius;Harold Bekkering

  • The early development of visual attention and its implications for social and cognitive development

    Sabine Hunnius

  • Joint action modulates motor system involvement during action observation in 3-year-olds.

    Marlene Meyer;Sabine Hunnius;Michiel van Elk;Michiel van Elk;Freek van Ede

  • Short-term motor training, but not observational training, alters neurocognitive mechanisms of action processing in infancy

    Sarah A. Gerson;Harold Bekkering;Sabine Hunnius

  • Diminished socially selective neural processing in 5-month-old infants at high familial risk of autism.

    Ricarda Braukmann;Sarah Lloyd‐Fox;Sarah Lloyd‐Fox;Anna Blasi;Mark H. Johnson;Mark H. Johnson

  • Gazepath: An eye-tracking analysis tool that accounts for individual differences and data quality.

    Daan R. van Renswoude;Maartje E. J. Raijmakers;Arnout Koornneef;Scott P. Johnson

  • Effects of preterm experience on the developing visual system: a longitudinal study of shifts of attention and gaze in early infancy.

    Sabine Hunnius;Reint H. Geuze;Mar J. Zweens;Arend F. Bos

  • Associations between the developmental trajectories of visual scanning and disengagement of attention in infants.

    S. Hunnius;Reint Geuze;van Paul Geert

Frequent Co-Authors

Harold Bekkering
Harold Bekkering Radboud University
Jan K. Buitelaar
Jan K. Buitelaar Radboud University
Markus Paulus
Markus Paulus Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Antonius H. N. Cillessen
Antonius H. N. Cillessen Radboud University
Michiel van Elk
Michiel van Elk Leiden University Medical Center
Asifa Majid
Asifa Majid University of York
Daniel Casasanto
Daniel Casasanto Cornell University
Freek van Ede
Freek van Ede Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Mark H. Johnson
Mark H. Johnson University of Cambridge
Chantal Kemner
Chantal Kemner Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree online opens doors to diverse career pathways, especially in mental health counseling. Many students choose to pursue further specialization in counseling, where state-specific education and certification requirements are key considerations. To understand what it takes, start by reviewing the steps for how to become a mental health counselor in Santa Ana. This pathway highlights the typical educational, supervised experience, and licensing requirements.

Requirements can vary significantly by location. For example, those interested in practicing in Arizona should check out the Scottsdale mental health counselor education requirements to learn about local qualifications. Similarly, the Seattle mental health counselor education requirements provide an overview for those looking at opportunities in Washington.

For students planning to practice in other parts of Washington, the Spokane mental health counselor certification requirements give additional insight into specific credentialing processes. Reviewing these pathways can help you choose the right online psychology degree to match your desired career goals and location.

Best Scientists Citing Sabine Hunnius

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles