World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
14140
World Ranking
9038
National Ranking
113

Prateek Saxena publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Prateek Saxena sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 119 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Prateek Saxena D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Prateek Saxena sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Prateek Saxena is affiliated with the National University of Singapore in Singapore. Their research predominantly spans the field of Computer Science with a focus on several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, Software, and Signal Processing.

Their recent publications encompass a range of topics related to security, privacy, and machine learning. Notable papers include:

  • "Epione: Lightweight Contact Tracing with Strong Privacy" (2020, arXiv (Cornell University))
  • "LPGNet" (2022, Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security)
  • "Membership Inference Attacks and Generalization" (2022, Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security)
  • "Using Throughput-Centric Byzantine Broadcast to Tolerate Malicious Majority in Blockchains" (2022, 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP))
  • "Dynamic Binary Translation for SGX Enclaves" (2022, ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security)

This body of work involves themes such as adversarial robustness in machine learning, security and verification in computing, privacy-preserving technologies in data, blockchain technology applications and security, advanced malware detection techniques, software testing and debugging techniques, and privacy, security, and data protection.

Prateek Saxena frequently collaborates with a number of researchers. Prominent coauthors in their work include:

  • Aashish Kolluri
  • Teodora Baluta
  • Ruomu Hou
  • Haifeng Yu
  • Shweta Shinde

Their research has been published across several venues, with multiple contributions to arXiv (Cornell University). Other venues include the Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security, Proceedings of the ACM on Programming Languages, the 2022 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), and ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security.

Best Publications

  • Making Smart Contracts Smarter.

    Loi Luu;Duc-Hiep Chu;Hrishi Olickel;Prateek Saxena

  • On Scaling Decentralized Blockchains

    Kyle Croman;Christian Decker;Ittay Eyal;Adem Efe Gencer

  • A Secure Sharding Protocol For Open Blockchains

    Loi Luu;Viswesh Narayanan;Chaodong Zheng;Kunal Baweja

  • BitBlaze: A New Approach to Computer Security via Binary Analysis

    Dawn Song;David Brumley;Heng Yin;Juan Caballero

  • Finding The Greedy, Prodigal, and Suicidal Contracts at Scale

    Ivica Nikolić;Aashish Kolluri;Ilya Sergey;Prateek Saxena

  • A Symbolic Execution Framework for JavaScript

    Prateek Saxena;Devdatta Akhawe;Steve Hanna;Feng Mao

  • Data-Oriented Programming: On the Expressiveness of Non-control Data Attacks

    Hong Hu;Shweta Shinde;Sendroiu Adrian;Zheng Leong Chua

  • Demystifying incentives in the consensus computer.

    Loi Luu;Jason Teutsch;Raghav Kulkarni;Prateek Saxena

  • Document Structure Integrity: A Robust Basis for Cross-site Scripting Defense.

    Yacin Nadji;Prateek Saxena;Dawn Song

  • Panoply: Low-TCB Linux Applications With SGX Enclaves.

    Shweta Shinde;Dat Le Tien;Shruti Tople;Prateek Saxena

  • Preventing Page Faults from Telling Your Secrets

    Shweta Shinde;Zheng Leong Chua;Viswesh Narayanan;Prateek Saxena

  • Loop-extended symbolic execution on binary programs

    Prateek Saxena;Pongsin Poosankam;Stephen McCamant;Dawn Song

  • Protecting Browsers from Extension Vulnerabilities

    Adam Barth;Adrienne Porter Felt;Prateek Saxena;Aaron Boodman

  • Auror: defending against poisoning attacks in collaborative deep learning systems

    Shiqi Shen;Shruti Tople;Prateek Saxena

  • A Traceability Analysis of Monero's Blockchain.

    Amrit Kumar;Clément Fischer;Shruti Tople;Prateek Saxena

  • On the Limits of Information Flow Techniques for Malware Analysis and Containment

    Lorenzo Cavallaro;Prateek Saxena;R. Sekar

  • Automatic generation of data-oriented exploits

    Hong Hu;Zheng Leong Chua;Sendroiu Adrian;Prateek Saxena

  • Fast and precise sanitizer analysis with BEK

    Pieter Hooimeijer;Benjamin Livshits;David Molnar;Prateek Saxena

  • A systematic analysis of XSS sanitization in web application frameworks

    Joel Weinberger;Prateek Saxena;Devdatta Akhawe;Matthew Finifter

  • FLAX: Systematic Discovery of Client-side Validation Vulnerabilities in Rich Web Applications.

    Prateek Saxena;Steve Hanna;Pongsin Poosankam;Dawn Song

Frequent Co-Authors

Zhenkai Liang
Zhenkai Liang National University of Singapore
Dawn Song
Dawn Song University of California, Berkeley
David Molnar
David Molnar Microsoft (United States)
Abhik Roychoudhury
Abhik Roychoudhury National University of Singapore
Benjamin Livshits
Benjamin Livshits Imperial College London
Margus Veanes
Margus Veanes Microsoft (United States)
Beng Chin Ooi
Beng Chin Ooi National University of Singapore
Vyas Sekar
Vyas Sekar Carnegie Mellon University
R. C. Sekar
R. C. Sekar Stony Brook University
Reza Shokri
Reza Shokri National University of Singapore

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to many related online degrees and certifications. For those who enjoy theory and analytical problem solving, an online physics bachelor's degree combines foundational thinking with technical skills, offering flexible study options.

There is also growing demand for professionals who can interpret large datasets. Earning a data science degree online can lead to high-paying positions in diverse industries. Admission to these programs is competitive, but many emphasize accessible, skills-based learning.

For those interested in hardware, communications, or energy, many universities offer electrical engineering degree online admissions, allowing students to gain practical engineering knowledge through remote study.

Not ready for a full degree? Consider certifications that pay well. These programs can boost your skill set and earnings potential in less time, making them perfect for those looking to advance or pivot in their tech careers.

Best Scientists Citing Prateek Saxena

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles