World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9924 9290 978 935 125 4586

Anna Franklin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anna Franklin between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anna Franklin published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2015. 14 of the 148 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2015. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 10 publications
2002 2025

148 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anna Franklin: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 1
2004 2
2005 2
2006 8
2007 3
2008 6
2009 6
2010 7
2011 5
2012 3
2013 7
2014 10
2015 24
2016 6
2017 6
2018 4
2019 5
2020 6
2021 6
2022 8
2023 8
2024 4
2025 10
Total 148
Download as CSV

Anna Franklin publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna Franklin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 125 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 125
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Anna Franklin D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna Franklin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Anna Franklin is affiliated with the University of Sussex in the United Kingdom and has a significant research footprint in the fields of psychology and neuroscience. Their work focuses on several subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, atomic and molecular physics and optics, and sensory systems.

Their primary research topics include:

  • Color perception and design
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Categorization, perception, and language
  • Aesthetic perception and analysis
  • Color science and applications
  • Olfactory and sensory function studies

Anna Franklin has contributed to numerous peer-reviewed journals, with frequent publications in the following venues:

  • Journal of Vision
  • Vision Research
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Preprints.org
  • Annual Review of Psychology

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Franklin include:

  • The Development of Color Perception and Cognition (2022), Annual Review of Psychology
  • Color-biased regions in the ventral visual pathway are food selective (2022), Current Biology
  • Color constancy and color term knowledge are positively related during early childhood (2020), Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
  • Infant color perception: Insight into perceptual development (2022), Child Development Perspectives
  • Colour vision is aligned with natural scene statistics at 4 months of age (2023), Developmental Science

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Jenny M. Bosten
  • John Maule
  • Alice E. Skelton
  • Ian Pennock
  • Chris Racey

Best Publications

  • Categorical perception of color is lateralized to the right hemisphere in infants, but to the left hemisphere in adults

    A. Franklin;G. V. Drivonikou;L. Bevis;I. R. L. Davies

  • Further Evidence That Whorfian Effects Are Stronger in the Right Visual Field Than the Left

    G. V. Drivonikou;P. Kay;T. Regier;R. B. Ivry

  • New evidence for infant colour categories

    Anna Franklin;Ian R.L. Davies

  • Color term knowledge does not affect categorical perception of color in toddlers

    Anna Franklin;Ally Clifford;Emma Williamson;Ian Davies

  • Lateralization of categorical perception of color changes with color term acquisition

    A. Franklin;G. V. Drivonikou;A. Clifford;P. Kay

  • Color preferences are not universal.

    Chloe Taylor;Alexandra Clifford;Anna Franklin

  • Biological origins of color categorization.

    Alice E Skelton;Gemma Catchpole;Joshua T Abbott;Jenny M Bosten

  • The nature of infant color categorization: evidence from eye movements on a target detection task.

    Anna Franklin;Michael Pilling;Ian Davies

  • Color Perception in Children with Autism

    Anna Franklin;Paul Sowden;Rachel Burley;Leslie Notman

  • Handbook of color psychology

    Andrew J. Elliot;Mark D. Fairchild;Anna Franklin

  • Categorical encoding of color in the brain

    Chris M. Bird;Samuel C. Berens;Aidan J. Horner;Anna Franklin

  • Electrophysiological markers of categorical perception of color in 7-month old infants.

    Alexandra Clifford;Anna Franklin;Ian R.L. Davies;Amanda Holmes

  • Color categories affect pre-attentive color perception

    Alexandra Clifford;Amanda Holmes;Ian R.L. Davies;Anna Franklin

  • Biological components of colour preference in infancy.

    Anna Franklin;Laura Bevis;Yazhu Ling;Anya Hurlbert

  • Color preferences in infants and adults are different

    Chloe Taylor;Karen Schloss;Stephen E. Palmer;Anna Franklin

  • Neurophysiological evidence for categorical perception of color

    Amanda Holmes;Anna Franklin;Alexandra Clifford;Ian Davies

  • Effects of ensemble complexity and perceptual similarity on rapid averaging of hue

    John Maule;Anna Franklin

  • The relationship between color-object associations and color preference: further investigation of ecological valence theory.

    Chloe Taylor;Anna Franklin

  • A systematic investigation of conceptual color associations.

    Diana Su Yun Tham;Paul T Sowden;Alexandra Grandison;Anna Franklin

  • The Development of Color Perception and Cognition

    Unknown

  • Reduced chromatic discrimination in children with autism spectrum disorders.

    Anna Franklin;Paul Sowden;Leslie Notman;Melissa Gonzalez-Dixon

  • Categorical similarity may affect colour pop-out in infants after all

    Ian Davies;Anna Franklin

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark D. Fairchild
Mark D. Fairchild Rochester Institute of Technology
Andrew J. Elliot
Andrew J. Elliot University of Rochester
Amanda Holmes
Amanda Holmes University of Roehampton
Paul Kay
Paul Kay University of California, Berkeley
Terry Regier
Terry Regier University of California, Berkeley
Jamie Ward
Jamie Ward University of Sussex
Neil G. Muggleton
Neil G. Muggleton National Central University
Elizabeth Pellicano
Elizabeth Pellicano University College London
Stephen E. Palmer
Stephen E. Palmer University of California, Berkeley
Asifa Majid
Asifa Majid University of York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a wide range of careers, including those outside traditional counseling roles. One fast-growing field is speech-language pathology, where professionals help individuals overcome communication and swallowing disorders. If you’re interested in a psychology-related healthcare path, there are many online degree programs that can set you on this journey.

To practice in this field, most states require a master’s degree and licensure. Requirements may vary based on location. For example, the steps for becoming a speech therapist in Utah include state-specific certifications. Similarly, those researching how to become a speech language pathologist in Vermont should review Vermont's education and exam processes.

If you plan to start your path elsewhere, check out the processes for how to become a speech language pathologist in Virginia or how to become a speech language pathologist in Washington. Exploring these state guidelines can help you choose the right degree and ensure you’re prepared for required licensure.

Best Scientists Citing Anna Franklin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles