World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
39
Citations
6456
World Ranking
8558
National Ranking
854

J. Richard Hanley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Richard Hanley sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 109 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

J. Richard Hanley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Richard Hanley sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

J. Richard Hanley is affiliated with the University of Essex in the United Kingdom. Their academic work spans several intersecting fields relating to the understanding of cognitive and neural processes.

The main fields of study for Hanley include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities

Their subfields further specify focus areas as:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics

Hanley's research topics cover a range of cognitive and behavioral phenomena, including:

  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Multisensory Perception and Integration
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Categorization, Perception, and Language
  • Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

One documented recent paper authored by Hanley, published in 2020, is titled Understanding the role of configural processing in face emotion recognition in Parkinson's disease. This work appeared in the Journal of Neuropsychology and focuses on perceptual aspects relevant to neurological conditions.

The primary publication venue associated with Hanley's work is:

  • Journal of Neuropsychology

Hanley has collaborated with the following frequent co-authors:

  • Rosanna Cousins
  • Anne Pettigrew
  • Olivia Ferrie

This profile reflects Hanley's ongoing engagement with interdisciplinary topics linking neuroscience, cognitive psychology, and language studies, highlighting areas of human perception and neural mechanisms. The concentration on cognitive and experimental psychology combined with neuroscience demonstrates a cross-disciplinary approach to examining brain function and behavioral outcomes.

Best Publications

  • Phonological awareness and visual skills in learning to read Chinese and English.

    Hsiu-Shuang Huang;J. Richard Hanley

  • Face processing impairments after amygdalotomy

    A. W. Young;John Patrick Aggleton;D. J. Hellawell;M. Johnson

  • Impairment of the visuo-spatial sketch pad.

    J. Richard Hanley;Andrew W. Young;Norma A. Pearson

  • Categorical perception of colour in the left and right visual field is verbally mediated: evidence from Korean.

    Debi Roberson;Hyensou Pak;J. Richard Hanley

  • Effects of orthographic transparency on reading and phoneme awareness in children learning to read in Wales.

    Llinos H. Spencer;J. Richard Hanley

  • A longitudinal study of phonological awareness, visual skills, and Chinese reading acquisition among first-graders in Taiwan

    H. S. Huang;J. Richard Hanley

  • Developmental phonagnosia: a selective deficit of vocal identity recognition.

    Lúcia Garrido;Frank Eisner;Carolyn McGettigan;Lauren Stewart

  • Defective recognition of familiar people

    J. Richard Hanley;Andrew W. Young;Norma A. Pearson

  • Developmental surface dyslexia and dysgraphia: an orthographic processing impairment.

    J. Richard Hanley;Kim Hastie;Janice Kay

  • The effects of different types of retrieval cues on the recall of names of famous faces

    J. Richard Hanley;Elaine S. Cowell

  • I Recognise You but I Can't Place You: An Investigation of Familiar-only Experiences during Tests of Voice and Face Recognition

    J. Richard Hanley;S. Tanya Smith;Jenny Hadfield

  • The effect of unattended speech on serial recall following auditory presentation

    J. Richard Hanley;Carol Broadbent

  • Impaired recall of verbal material following rupture and repair of an anterior communicating artery aneurysm

    J. Richard Hanley;Ann D.M. Davies;John J. Downes;Andrew R. Mayes

  • How long do the advantages of learning to read a transparent orthography last? An investigation of the reading skills and reading impairment of Welsh children at 10 years of age.

    J. Richard Hanley;Jackie Masterson;Llinos H. Spencer;Dylan Evans

  • The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Do experimenter-presented interlopers have any effect?

    Timothy J. Perfect;J.Richard Hanley

  • Irrelevant speech, articulatory suppression, and phonological similarity: A test of the phonological loop model and the feature model

    J. Richard Hanley;Eirini Bakopoulou

  • Thresholds for color discrimination in English and Korean speakers.

    Debi Roberson;J. Richard Hanley;Hyensou Pak

  • Anomia for common names and geographical names with preserved retrieval of names of people: a semantic memory disorder.

    Frances Lyons;J Richard Hanley;Janice Kay

  • Reading and Spelling Impairments in Undergraduate Students with Developmental Dyslexia

    J. Richard Hanley

  • Evidence for the involvement of a nonlexical route in the repetition of familiar words: A comparison of single and dual route models of auditory repetition.

    J Richard Hanley;Gary S Dell;Janice Kay;Rachel Baron

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew W. Young
Andrew W. Young University of York
Catherine Haslam
Catherine Haslam University of Queensland
Gary S. Dell
Gary S. Dell University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Sarah Peters
Sarah Peters University of Manchester
Lauren Stewart
Lauren Stewart Goldsmiths University of London
Lyndsey Nickels
Lyndsey Nickels Macquarie University
Stefan R. Schweinberger
Stefan R. Schweinberger Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Jason D. Warren
Jason D. Warren University College London
Timothy J. Perfect
Timothy J. Perfect Plymouth University
Neil Humphrey
Neil Humphrey University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a degree in Psychology in the USA, there are several related online degrees and career pathways worth exploring. Social work is a popular choice for many psychology graduates, as it blends knowledge of human behavior with practical support for individuals and communities.

Educational requirements for social workers differ by state. For instance, those interested in the requirements to be a social worker in Illinois will find that a Master of Social Work (MSW) is typically necessary for higher-level roles and clinical practice. In neighboring Indiana, the Indiana social work education requirements are similar, emphasizing accredited degrees and supervised fieldwork.

Students considering work in the Midwest should also review the requirements to be a social worker in Iowa, where licensure is structured by level of education. Kansas residents should note the steps for becoming a social worker in Kansas, including specific degree and examination criteria.

Whichever path you choose, both psychology and social work degrees offer flexibility through online study and open doors to rewarding careers in counseling, healthcare, education, and more.

Best Scientists Citing J. Richard Hanley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles