World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
70
Citations
59034
World Ranking
2212
National Ranking
1287

Anne Treisman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne Treisman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 127 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Anne Treisman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne Treisman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - US President's National Medal of Science "For a 50-year career of penetrating originality and depth that has led to the understanding of fundamental attentional limits in the human mind and brain.", President Barack H. Obama in the East Room of the White House on February 1, 2013.
  • 2009 - Grawemeyer Award in Psychology, University of Louisville
  • 2002 - William James Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science (APA)
  • 1996 - Golden Brain Award, Minerva Foundation
  • 1994 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 1990 - APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology, American Psychological Association
  • 1965 - Spearman Medal, British Psychological Society

Overview

Anne Treisman was affiliated with Princeton University in the United States. Their research career spanned over five decades, focusing primarily on the study of attention and perception within the human mind and brain.

Throughout their career, Treisman received multiple awards recognizing contributions to psychological science and cognitive research. Among these honors were the US President's National Medal of Science in 2011, awarded for "a 50-year career of penetrating originality and depth that has led to the understanding of fundamental attentional limits in the human mind and brain," as cited by President Barack H. Obama. Other distinctions included the Grawemeyer Award in Psychology from the University of Louisville in 2009, the William James Fellow Award from the Association for Psychological Science in 2002, and the Golden Brain Award from the Minerva Foundation in 1996.

Treisman was also elected as a Member of the National Academy of Sciences in 1994, reflecting their standing in the scientific community. Additional honors included the APA Award for Distinguished Scientific Contributions to Psychology in 1990, and the Spearman Medal from the British Psychological Society in 1965.

No specific recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or main and subfields of study were documented for this scientist. There were also no main topics or thematic areas of work listed in the available source data.

Best Publications

  • A feature-integration theory of attention

    Anne M. Treisman;Garry Gelade

  • Feature analysis in early vision : evidence from search asymmetries

    Anne Treisman;Stephen Gormican

  • The reviewing of object files: object-specific integration of information.

    Daniel Kahneman;Anne Treisman;Brian J Gibbs

  • Features and objects: the fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture.

    Anne Treisman

  • Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects.

    Anne Treisman;Hilary Schmidt

  • Strategies and models of selective attention.

    Anne M. Treisman

  • Conjunction search revisited

    Anne Treisman;Sharon Sato

  • The binding problem

    Anne Treisman

  • Preattentive processing in vision

    Anne Treisman

  • Contextual cues in selective listening.

    Anne M. Treisman

  • Search asymmetry: A diagnostic for preattentive processing of separable features

    Anne Treisman;Janet Souther

  • Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects.

    Anne Treisman

  • Binding in short-term visual memory.

    Mary E. Wheeler;Anne M. Treisman

  • Features and objects in visual processing

    Anne Treisman

  • Feature binding, attention and object perception

    Anne Treisman

  • Representation of statistical properties

    Sang Chul Chong;Anne Treisman

  • Binding in short-term visual memory.

    Unknown

  • Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions

    Stacia R. Friedman-Hill;Lynn C. Robertson;Anne Treisman

  • SELECTIVE ATTENTION IN MAN.

    Anne. M. Treisman

  • Voluntary attention modulates fMRI activity in human MT-MST

    Kathleen M. O'Craven;Bruce R. Rosen;Kenneth K. Kwong;Anne Treisman

  • VERBAL CUES, LANGUAGE, AND MEANING IN SELECTIVE ATTENTION.

    Anne M. Treisman

  • The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

    Anne M. Treisman;Gina Geffen

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick Cavanagh
Patrick Cavanagh York University
Lynn C. Robertson
Lynn C. Robertson University of California, Berkeley
John S. Duncan
John S. Duncan University College London
Daniel Kahneman
Daniel Kahneman Princeton University
Glyn W. Humphreys
Glyn W. Humphreys University of Oxford
Jonathan D. Cohen
Jonathan D. Cohen Princeton University
Paul E. Downing
Paul E. Downing Bangor University
Marcia Grabowecky
Marcia Grabowecky Northwestern University
Zhe Chen
Zhe Chen Aalborg University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a future in Psychology? Online degrees in this field open doors to a variety of career pathways, especially in mental health counseling. Many students pursue a psychology degree with the goal of becoming a licensed mental health counselor, but it’s important to understand that certification requirements can vary significantly by location.

For instance, you can review the Lubbock mental health counselor certification requirements to learn about education and supervised experience needed in Texas. Similarly, the Madison mental health counselor certification requirements give insight into Wisconsin’s licensing process. Those looking to practice in Tennessee should research how to become a mental health counselor in Memphis, while Arizona-bound students can explore the Mesa mental health counselor education requirements.

No matter your location, an online psychology degree can prepare you for graduate studies and licensure. Make sure to research state-specific expectations early to ensure your education aligns with your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Anne Treisman

Recently Published Articles