World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Netherlands
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
56
Citations
26047
World Ranking
3947
National Ranking
49

Marcel Worring publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcel Worring sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 399 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Marcel Worring D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcel Worring sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Netherlands Leader Award
  • 2012 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Marcel Worring is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science, with a focus on computer vision and pattern recognition, artificial intelligence, and related subfields such as radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, signal processing, and ocean engineering.

Their research spans multiple topics, including:

  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Topic Modeling
  • Video Analysis and Summarization
  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques

Marcel Worring has published numerous papers, with some recent works including:

  • The Dawn of Quantum Natural Language Processing (2022) - ICASSP 2022 - 2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP)
  • Visual Analytics for Temporal Hypergraph Model Exploration (2020) - IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • Uncertainty-aware report generation for chest X-rays by variational topic inference (2022) - Medical Image Analysis
  • Likelihood Ratios for Deep Neural Networks in Face Comparison (2020) - Journal of Forensic Sciences
  • Expert-defined Keywords Improve Interpretability of Retinal Image Captioning (2023) - 2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)

Their frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
  • Journal of Forensic Sciences
  • 2023 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV)
  • Expert Systems with Applications

Marcel Worring has collaborated regularly with several coauthors, such as:

  • Stevan Rudinac
  • Jia-Hong Huang
  • Xiantong Zhen
  • Zeno Geradts
  • Tom van Sonsbeek

In recognition of their contributions to the field, Marcel Worring was awarded the ACM Senior Member status in 2012.

Best Publications

  • Content-based image retrieval at the end of the early years

    A.W.M. Smeulders;M. Worring;S. Santini;A. Gupta

  • Early versus late fusion in semantic video analysis

    Cees G. M. Snoek;Marcel Worring;Arnold W. M. Smeulders

  • ICDAR 2003 robust reading competitions: entries, results, and future directions

    Simon M. Lucas;Alex Panaretos;Luis Sosa;Anthony Tang

  • The challenge problem for automated detection of 101 semantic concepts in multimedia

    Cees G. M. Snoek;Marcel Worring;Jan C. van Gemert;Jan-Mark Geusebroek

  • Multimodal Video Indexing: A Review of the State-of-the-art

    Cees G. M. Snoek;Marcel Worring

  • Proceedings of the 21st ACM international conference on Multimedia

    Alejandro (Alex) Jaimes;Nicu Sebe;Nozha Boujemaa;Daniel Gatica-Perez

  • Learning Social Tag Relevance by Neighbor Voting

    Xirong Li;C.G.M. Snoek;M. Worring

  • Concept-Based Video Retrieval

    Cees G. M. Snoek;Marcel Worring

  • The MediaMill TRECVID 2009 Semantic Video Search Engine

    C.G.M. Snoek;K.E.A. van de Sande;O. de Rooij;B. Huurnink

  • The MediaMill TRECVID 2008 Semantic Video Search Engine

    C.G.M. Snoek;K.E.A. van de Sande;O. de Rooij;B. Huurnink

  • NIST Special Publication

    C.G.M. Snoek;M. Worring;J.M. Geusebroek;D.C. Koelma

  • The MediaMill TRECVID 2006 semantic video search engine

    C.G.M. Snoek;J.C. van Gemert;T. Gevers;B. Huurnink

  • The MediaMill TRECVID 2007 Semantic Video Search Engine

    C. Snoek;I. Everts;van J.C. Gemert;Jan-Mark Geusebroek

  • The MediaMill TRECVID 2010 semantic video search engine

    C.G.M. Snoek;K.E.A. van de Sande;O. de Rooij;B. Huurnink

  • The MediaMill TRECVID 2004 Semantic Video Search Engine

    C. G. M. Snoek;M. Worring;J. M. Geusebroek;D. C. Koelma

  • The MediaMill TRECVID 2005 Semantic Video Search Engine

    C. Snoek;van J.C. Gemert;Jan-Mark Geusebroek;B. Huurnink

  • Watersnakes: energy-driven watershed segmentation

    Hieu Tat Nguyen;M. Worring;R. van den Boomgaard

  • What You Feel, Is What You Like Influence of Message Appeals on Customer Engagement on Instagram

    Robert Rietveld;Willemijn van Dolen;Masoud Mazloom;Marcel Worring

  • Digital curvature estimation

    Marcel Worring;Arnold W. M. Smeulders

  • Adding Semantics to Detectors for Video Retrieval

    C.G.M. Snoek;B. Huurnink;L. Hollink;M. de Rijke

  • Learning tag relevance by neighbor voting for social image retrieval

    Xirong Li;Cees G. M. Snoek;Marcel Worring

  • Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Multimedia Conference

    Alan Hanjalic;Cees Snoek;Marcel Worring;Dick Bulterman

  • Content-based visual search learned from social media

    Xirong Li

Frequent Co-Authors

Cees G. M. Snoek
Cees G. M. Snoek University of Amsterdam
Arnold W. M. Smeulders
Arnold W. M. Smeulders University of Amsterdam
Jan-Mark Geusebroek
Jan-Mark Geusebroek University of Amsterdam
Xirong Li
Xirong Li Renmin University of China
Theo Gevers
Theo Gevers University of Amsterdam
Andrew D. Bagdanov
Andrew D. Bagdanov University of Florence
Ramesh Jain
Ramesh Jain University of California, Irvine
Christof Monz
Christof Monz University of Amsterdam
Sebastiano Battiato
Sebastiano Battiato University of Catania
Jan C. van Gemert
Jan C. van Gemert Delft University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can greatly expand your career opportunities in Computer Science and related fields. For those seeking a fast track into the technology sector, an associate degree in 6 months online offers a quick way to gain foundational skills and enter the workforce sooner.

Cost is a major consideration for many students. There are plenty of options for a cheapest online business management degree or to earn the cheapest bachelor degree online, both of which can provide valuable qualifications for roles in tech management, analysis, or administration.

If you’re interested in technical and engineering pathways, many accredited schools now offer robust online engineering programs. These degrees can lead to dynamic careers in software development, systems design, or IT infrastructure.

Whether you’re looking for an affordable path into tech or aiming to build specialist skills, online degrees allow flexible scheduling as you take steps toward your future in Computer Science.

Best Scientists Citing Marcel Worring

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles