World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
6041
World Ranking
10246
National Ranking
79

Ioannis Stamelos publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ioannis Stamelos sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 245 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ioannis Stamelos D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ioannis Stamelos sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ioannis Stamelos is affiliated with Aristotle University of Thessaloniki in Greece and conducts research primarily in the field of Computer Science. Their work covers a range of subfields including Information Systems, Computer Science Applications, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Management Information Systems.

Their research topics focus on Software Engineering Research, Open Source Software Innovations, Sports Performance and Training, Artificial Intelligence in Games, Online Learning and Analytics, Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices, and Blockchain Technology Applications and Security.

Significant recent publications by Ioannis Stamelos include:

  • Elastic-DF: Scaling Performance of DNN Inference in FPGA Clouds through Automatic Partitioning (2021), published in ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems
  • Enterprise information management systems development two cases of mining for process conformance (2022), published in International Journal of Information Management Data Insights
  • Architectural solutions for improving transparency, data quality, and security in eHealth systems by designing and adding blockchain modules, while maintaining interoperability: the eHDSI network case (2024), published in Health and Technology
  • Crowdsourcing in Software Development: Empirical Support for Configuring Contests (2020), published in IEEE Access
  • Neurological Examination via Telemedicine: An Updated Review Focusing on Movement Disorders (2024), published in Medicina

Frequently working with other researchers, their notable collaborators include:

  • Τhrasyvoulos Tsiatsos
  • Apostolos Kritikos
  • Lampros Karavidas
  • Sofia Terzi
  • Apostolos Ampatzoglou

Their research has appeared predominantly in:

  • Journal of Software Evolution and Process
  • ACM Transactions on Reconfigurable Technology and Systems
  • Health and Technology
  • International Journal of Information Management Data Insights
  • Medicina

Best Publications

  • Code quality analysis in open source software development

    Ioannis Stamelos;Lefteris Angelis;Apostolos Oikonomou;Georgios L. Bleris

  • A Simulation Tool for Efficient Analogy Based Cost Estimation

    L. Angelis;I. Stamelos

  • The SQO-OSS Quality Model: Measurement Based Open Source Software Evaluation

    Ioannis Samoladas;Georgios Gousios;Diomidis Spinellis;Ioannis Stamelos

  • Understanding knowledge sharing activities in free/open source software projects: An empirical study

    Sulayman K. Sowe;Ioannis Stamelos;Lefteris Angelis

  • The effect of scaffolding students' context-generating cognitive activity in technology-enhanced case-based learning

    Stavros N. Demetriadis;Pantelis M. Papadopoulos;Ioannis G. Stamelos;Frank Fischer

  • Software engineering research for computer games: A systematic review

    Apostolos Ampatzoglou;Ioannis Stamelos

  • Software productivity and effort prediction with ordinal regression

    Panagiotis Sentas;Lefteris Angelis;Ioannis Stamelos;Georgios L. Bleris

  • Building a software cost estimation model based on categorical data

    L. Angelis;I. Stamelos;M. Morisio

  • On the use of Bayesian belief networks for the prediction of software productivity

    Ioannis Stamelos;Lefteris Angelis;P. Dimou;Evaggelos Sakellaris

  • Open source software development should strive for even greater code maintainability

    Ioannis Samoladas;Ioannis Stamelos;Lefteris Angelis;Apostolos Oikonomou

  • An experimental investigation of personality types impact on pair effectiveness in pair programming

    Panagiotis Sfetsos;Ioannis Stamelos;Lefteris Angelis;Ignatios Deligiannis

  • Research state of the art on GoF design patterns: A mapping study

    Apostolos Ampatzoglou;Sofia Charalampidou;Ioannis Stamelos

  • An empirical investigation of an object-oriented design heuristic for maintainability

    Ignatios Deligiannis;Martin Shepperd;Manos Roumeliotis;Ioannis Stamelos

  • Evaluating children performance with graphical and tangible robot programming tools

    Theodosios Sapounidis;Stavros Demetriadis;Ioannis Stamelos

  • Survival analysis on the duration of open source projects

    Ioannis Samoladas;Lefteris Angelis;Ioannis Stamelos

  • Evaluating the Quality of Open Source Software

    Diomidis Spinellis;Georgios Gousios;Vassilios Karakoidas;Panagiotis Louridas

  • Identifying knowledge brokers that yield software engineering knowledge in OSS projects

    Sulayman K. Sowe;Ioannis Stamelos;Lefteris Angelis

  • A controlled experiment investigation of an object-oriented design heuristic for maintainability

    Ignatios S. Deligiannis;Ioannis Stamelos;Lefteris Angelis;Manos Roumeliotis

  • A methodology to assess the impact of design patterns on software quality

    Apostolos Ampatzoglou;Georgia Frantzeskou;Ioannis Stamelos

  • Managing uncertainty in project portfolio cost estimation

    Ioannis Stamelos;Lefteris Angelis

Frequent Co-Authors

Lefteris Angelis
Lefteris Angelis Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Alexander Chatzigeorgiou
Alexander Chatzigeorgiou University of Macedonia
Paris Avgeriou
Paris Avgeriou University of Groningen
Dimitrios Soudris
Dimitrios Soudris National Technical University of Athens
Ioannis Vlahavas
Ioannis Vlahavas Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Maurizio Morisio
Maurizio Morisio Polytechnic University of Turin
Dimitrios Tzovaras
Dimitrios Tzovaras Centre for Research and Technology Hellas
Ina Schaefer
Ina Schaefer Technische Universität Braunschweig
Diomidis Spinellis
Diomidis Spinellis Athens University of Economics and Business
Grigorios Tsoumakas
Grigorios Tsoumakas Aristotle University of Thessaloniki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens various online educational opportunities tailored for diverse backgrounds and goals. Many students prioritize cost and accessibility. You’ll find affordable online colleges that provide respected computer science programs without overwhelming tuition fees, making higher education more attainable.

Not everyone starts their studies with a perfect academic record. Luckily, there are online colleges that accept low gpa, giving you a second chance to launch a successful tech career. Once admitted, students can choose flexible formats, including full-time and accelerated paths. Discover the best options with this guide to computer science degree online programs, which allow you to complete coursework quickly and enter the workforce sooner.

Graduates enjoy strong career prospects. But if your interests are broader, consider exploring other program pathways. For example, see what doors open when you ask, what can you do with an environmental science degree? Whether you pursue software development, data science, or other tech fields, online study options ensure there’s a pathway to match your ambitions.

Best Scientists Citing Ioannis Stamelos

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles