World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
76
Citations
106144
World Ranking
4906
National Ranking
2355

Computer Science

D-Index
72
Citations
102002
World Ranking
1628
National Ranking
842

Suzanna E. Lewis publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Suzanna E. Lewis sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 131 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Suzanna E. Lewis D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Suzanna E. Lewis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Suzanna E. Lewis is affiliated with the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in the United States. Their research spans fields within Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Computer Science.

The main subfields of study include Molecular Biology, Artificial Intelligence, and Information Systems. Their work covers several key topics, primarily focusing on Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies, Semantic Web and Ontologies, Research Data Management Practices, Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks, and Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies.

Recent publications by Suzanna E. Lewis include:

  • OBO Foundry in 2021: operationalizing open data principles to evaluate ontologies, 2021, Database
  • OBO Foundry in 2021: Operationalizing Open Data Principles to Evaluate Ontologies, 2021, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • A compendium of human gene functions derived from evolutionary modelling, 2025, Nature
  • owlcollab/owltools: 2020-04-06, 2020, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Unification of multi-species vertebrate anatomy ontologies for comparative biology in Uberon, 2020, UNC Libraries

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Chris Mungall
  • James P. Balhoff
  • James A. Overton
  • Seth Carbon
  • Nomi L. Harris

Suzanna E. Lewis has published multiple works across the following venues:

  • Database
  • Nature
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • UNC Libraries

The scientist was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2005.

Best Publications

  • Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology

    M Ashburner;C A Ball;J A Blake;D Botstein

  • The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster

    M. D. Adams;S. E. Celniker;R. A. Holt;C. A. Evans

  • The Gene Ontology Resource: 20 years and still GOing strong

    S. Carbon;E. Douglass;N. Dunn;B. Good

  • The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource.

    Harris Ma;Clark J;Ireland A;Lomax J

  • The OBO Foundry : coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration

    Barry Smith;Michael Ashburner;Cornelius Rosse;Jonathan Bard

  • AmiGO: online access to ontology and annotation data

    Seth Carbon;Amelia Ireland;Christopher J. Mungall;ShengQiang Shu

  • Comparative Genomics of the Eukaryotes

    Gerald M. Rubin;Mark D. Yandell;Jennifer R. Wortman;George L. Gabor

  • Reactome: a knowledgebase of biological pathways.

    G. Joshi-Tope;M. Gillespie;M. Gillespie;I. Vastrik;P. D'Eustachio;P. D'Eustachio

  • The Generic Genome Browser: A Building Block for a Model Organism System Database

    Lincoln D. Stein;Christopher Mungall;ShengQiang Shu;Michael Caudy

  • The minimum information about a genome sequence (MIGS) specification.

    Dawn Field;George Garrity;Tanya Gray;Norman Morrison

  • Identification of Functional Elements and Regulatory Circuits by Drosophila modENCODE

    Sushmita Roy;Jason Ernst;Peter V. Kharchenko;Pouya Kheradpour

  • Integrative analysis of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome by the modENCODE project

    Mark B. Gerstein;Zhi John Lu;Eric L. Van Nostrand;Chao Cheng

  • Reactome knowledgebase of human biological pathways and processes.

    Lisa Matthews;Gopal Gopinath;Marc Gillespie;Michael Caudy

  • The Sequence Ontology: a tool for the unification of genome annotations

    Karen Eilbeck;Suzanna E Lewis;Christopher J Mungall;Mark D Yandell

  • The Human Phenotype Ontology project: linking molecular biology and disease through phenotype data

    Sebastian Köhler;Sandra C. Doelken;Christopher J. Mungall;Sebastian Bauer

  • Phylogenetic-based propagation of functional annotations within the Gene Ontology consortium

    Pascale Gaudet;Michael S. Livstone;Suzanna E. Lewis;Paul D. Thomas

  • Systematic determination of patterns of gene expression during Drosophila embryogenesis

    Pavel Tomancak;Amy Beaton;Richard Weiszmann;Elaine Kwan

  • Uberon, an integrative multi-species anatomy ontology

    Christopher J Mungall;Carlo Torniai;Georgios V Gkoutos;Suzanna E Lewis

  • JBrowse: a dynamic web platform for genome visualization and analysis

    Robert Buels;Eric Yao;Colin M. Diesh;Richard D. Hayes;Richard D. Hayes

  • Reactome: a knowledge base of biologic pathways and processes

    Imre Vastrik;Peter D'Eustachio;Peter D'Eustachio;Esther Schmidt;Geeta Joshi-Tope

  • Gene ontology annotations and resources

    Blake Ja;Dolan M;Drabkin H

  • The Gene Ontology project in 2008

    Midori A Harris;Jennifer I. Deegan;Amelia Ireland;Jane Lomax

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher J. Mungall
Christopher J. Mungall Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Michael Ashburner
Michael Ashburner University of Cambridge
Gerald M. Rubin
Gerald M. Rubin Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Lincoln Stein
Lincoln Stein Ontario Institute for Cancer Research
Peter N. Robinson
Peter N. Robinson The Jackson Laboratory
Melissa A. Haendel
Melissa A. Haendel University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Damian Smedley
Damian Smedley Queen Mary University of London
Judith A. Blake
Judith A. Blake Edith Cowan University
Pascale Gaudet
Pascale Gaudet Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics
Paul D. Thomas
Paul D. Thomas University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and dynamic career pathways. For those keen on leadership within the tech industry, pursuing advanced business skills through programs such as the cheapest executive mba online can be an excellent complement to a technical background.

If your interests span into the information sciences, consider earning a library science masters. This field blends technology, data management, and user experience, providing exciting job opportunities in both private and public sectors.

Budget-conscious students have many options for online education. You can discover a variety of affordable online masters programs that allow you to gain specialized skills and stand out in the competitive tech job market.

For those aiming to lead organizations or drive innovation, pursuing a phd organizational leadership can pave the way to executive or academic roles, further enhancing your impact within the digital landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Suzanna E. Lewis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles