World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jiří Danihelka

Jiří Danihelka

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
45
Citations
10194
World Ranking
4775
National Ranking
25

Jiří Danihelka publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jiří Danihelka sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 184 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Jiří Danihelka D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jiří Danihelka sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jiří Danihelka is a researcher affiliated with Masaryk University in the Czech Republic, specializing in agricultural and biological sciences, with a particular focus on plant science and ecology.

Their research spans several subfields including plant science, ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, nature and landscape conservation, ecological modeling, and molecular biology. The main topics of their work encompass botany and plant ecology studies, ecology and vegetation dynamics, bryophyte studies and records, Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna, species distribution and climate change, plant and animal studies, as well as plant and fungal species descriptions.

Jiří Danihelka has contributed to multiple papers published in notable venues. Some recent publications include:

  • EUNIS Habitat Classification: Expert system, characteristic species combinations and distribution maps of European habitats (2020, Applied Vegetation Science)
  • Synchrony matters more than species richness in plant community stability at a global scale (2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)
  • Pladias Database of the Czech flora and vegetation (2021, Preslia)
  • Benchmarking plant diversity of Palaearctic grasslands and other open habitats (2021, Journal of Vegetation Science)
  • The colonial legacy of herbaria (2023, Nature Human Behaviour)

The scientist collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including Milan Chytrý, Jürgen Dengler, Ilona Knollová, Martin Večeřa, and Zdeněk Kaplan. These collaborations have been substantial, reflecting continuity within their research network.

Jiří Danihelka's work is frequently published in venues such as Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), OPAL (Open@LaTrobe), Preslia, Journal of Vegetation Science, and Applied Vegetation Science. These outlets are notable for disseminating research in ecological and plant science fields.

Best Publications

  • TRY plant trait database : Enhanced coverage and open access

    Jens Kattge;Gerhard Bönisch;Sandra Díaz;Sandra Lavorel

  • Vegetace České republiky 1. Travinná a keříčková společenstva

    Milan Chytrý;Martin Kočí;Kateřina Šumberová;Jiří Sádlo

  • SEPARATING HABITAT INVASIBILITY BY ALIEN PLANTS FROM THE ACTUAL LEVEL OF INVASION

    Milan Chytrý;Vojtěch Jarošík;Vojtěch Jarošík;Petr Pyšek;Petr Pyšek;Ondřej Hájek

  • Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic (2nd edition): checklist update, taxonomic diversity and invasion patterns

    Petr Pyšek;Jiří Danihelka;Jiří Sádlo;Jindřich Chrtek

  • Checklist of vascular plants of the Czech Republic

    Jiří Danihelka;Jindřich Chrtek;Zdeněk Kaplan

  • European Vegetation Archive (EVA): an integrated database of European vegetation plots

    Milan Chytrý;Stephan M. Hennekens;Borja Jiménez‐Alfaro;Ilona Knollová

  • Invasions by alien plants in the Czech Republic: a quantitativeassessment across habitats

    Milan Chytrý;Petr Pyšek;Lubomír Tichý;Ilona Knollová

  • EUNIS Habitat Classification: expert system, characteristic species combinations and distribution maps of European habitats

    Milan Chytrý;Lubomír Tichý;Stephan M. Hennekens;Ilona Knollová

  • The global invasion success of Central European plants is related to distribution characteristics in their native range and species traits

    Petr Pysek;Jan Pergl;Rod Randall

  • CLO-PLA: a database of clonal and bud-bank traits of the Central European flora.

    Jitka Klimešová;Jiří Danihelka;Jindřich Chrtek;Francesco de Bello;Francesco de Bello

  • Synchrony matters more than species richness in plant community stability at a global scale.

    Enrique Valencia;Francesco de Bello;Thomas Galland;Peter B Adler;Peter B Adler

  • Naturalization of central European plants in North America: species traits, habitats, propagule pressure, residence time

    Petr Pyšek;Petr Pyšek;Petr Pyšek;Ameur M. Manceur;Christina Alba;Kirsty F. McGregor;Kirsty F. McGregor;Kirsty F. McGregor

  • Native and alien floras in urban habitats: a comparison across 32 cities of central Europe

    Zdeňka Lososová;Milan Chytrý;Lubomír Tichý;Jiří Danihelka;Jiří Danihelka

  • Biotic homogenization of Central European urban floras depends on residence time of alien species and habitat types

    Zdeňka Lososová;Milan Chytrý;Lubomír Tichý;Jiří Danihelka;Jiří Danihelka

  • Pladias Database of the Czech Flora and Vegetation

    Milan Chytrý;Jiří Danihelka;Zdeněk Kaplan;Jan Wild

  • Plant species richness in continental southern Siberia: effects of pH and climate in the context of the species pool hypothesis

    Milan Chytrý;Jiří Danihelka;Jiří Danihelka;Nikolai Ermakov;Michal Hájek;Michal Hájek

  • Klíč ke květeně České republiky

    Zdeněk Kaplan;Jiří Danihelka;Jindřich jun. Chrtek;Jan Kirschner

  • Inferring Species Networks from Gene Trees in High-polyploid North American and Hawaiian Violets (Viola, Violaceae)

    Thomas Marcussen;Kjetill S. Jakobsen;Jiří Danihelka;Jiří Danihelka;Harvey E. Ballard

  • Diversity of Central European urban biota: effects of human-made habitat types on plants and land snails

    Zdeňka Lososová;Michal Horsák;Milan Chytrý;Tomáš Čejka

  • Genetic structure among and within peripheral and central populations of three endangered floodplain violets.

    R. L. Eckstein;R. A. O’Neill;J. Danihelka;J. Danihelka;A. Otte

Frequent Co-Authors

Milan Chytrý
Milan Chytrý Masaryk University
Lubomír Tichý
Lubomír Tichý Masaryk University
Petra Hájková
Petra Hájková Masaryk University
Michal Hájek
Michal Hájek Masaryk University
Petr Pyšek
Petr Pyšek Czech Academy of Sciences
Michal Horsák
Michal Horsák Masaryk University
Jürgen Dengler
Jürgen Dengler Zurich University of Applied Sciences
Jan Wild
Jan Wild Czech Academy of Sciences
Karsten Wesche
Karsten Wesche Senckenberg Museum für Naturkunde Görlitz
Tomáš Herben
Tomáš Herben Charles University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution in the USA opens doors to a range of related fields and interdisciplinary opportunities. Many students choose to strengthen their expertise by pursuing additional online degrees. For those with an interest in environmental design or sustainable infrastructure, exploring naab-accredited online architecture degrees can offer a unique skill set valuable in conservation planning and eco-friendly architecture.

Quantitative skills are highly sought after in ecological research and data analysis. If you want to deepen your analytical expertise, online math degree programs provide a flexible pathway to develop mathematics skills crucial for ecological modeling and research.

Effective communication and public outreach are also essential in this field. Creative professionals might consider studying at online graphic design schools to master skills that are invaluable for educational material, scientific illustration, and visualizing environmental data.

Finally, if you seek flexibility and want to combine multiple areas of study, reviewing online interdisciplinary studies degree ranking affordable options can help tailor a degree to your unique interests in ecology, evolution, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Jiří Danihelka

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles