World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michal Horsák

Michal Horsák

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
42
Citations
6037
World Ranking
5627
National Ranking
34

Michal Horsák publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michal Horsák sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 372 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Michal Horsák D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michal Horsák sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michal Horsák is affiliated with Masaryk University in the Czech Republic and focuses on research areas within Environmental Science, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their work is mainly centered on Ecology, Insect Science, Oceanography, Atmospheric Science, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, reflecting a broad interest in environmental and biological research.

The scientist's main research topics cover Mollusks and Parasites Studies, Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior, Marine Biology and Ecology Research, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology, Botany and Plant Ecology Studies, and Parasite Biology and Host Interactions. These topics underscore a focus on ecological dynamics and species interactions within diverse aquatic and terrestrial environments.

Among the recent papers published by Michal Horsák are:

  • A European map of groundwater pH and calcium, 2021, Earth system science data
  • What defines insularity for plants in edaphic islands?, 2021, Ecography
  • Invasion at the population level: a story of the freshwater snails Gyraulus parvus and G. laevis, 2021, Hydrobiologia
  • Integrative taxonomic consideration of the Holarctic Euconulus fulvus group of land snails (Gastropoda, Stylommatophora), 2020, Systematics and Biodiversity
  • Malacological news from the Czech and Slovak Republics in 2015-2019, 2020, Malacologica Bohemoslovaca

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Michal Horsák include Veronika Horsáková, Luboš Beran, Petra Hájková, Jitka Horáčková, and Radovan Coufal. These collaborations likely contribute to multidisciplinary approaches across ecological and malacological studies.

Publishing venues where Michal Horsák has appeared frequently include Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Hydrobiologia, Malacologica Bohemoslovaca, Quaternary Science Reviews, and SSRN Electronic Journal. These venues represent a range of platforms for environmental, biological, and ecological science dissemination.

Best Publications

  • Habitat diversity of central European fens in relation to environmental gradients and an effort to standardise fen terminology in ecological studies

    Michal Hájek;Michal Horsák;Petra Hájková;Daniel Dítě

  • Environmental and spatial controls of biotic assemblages in a discrete semi‐terrestrial habitat: comparison of organisms with different dispersal abilities sampled in the same plots

    Michal Hájek;Michal Hájek;Jan Roleček;Jan Roleček;Karl Cottenie;Kateřina Kintrová

  • Diversity of Central European urban biota: effects of human-made habitat types on plants and land snails

    Zdeňka Lososová;Michal Horsák;Milan Chytrý;Tomáš Čejka

  • Mollusc community patterns and species response curves along a mineral richness gradient: a case study in fens

    Michal Horsák

  • COMPOSITION AND SPECIES RICHNESS OF MOLLUSCAN COMMUNITIES IN RELATION TO VEGETATION AND WATER CHEMISTRY IN THE WESTERN CARPATHIAN SPRING FENS: THE POOR–RICH GRADIENT

    Michal Horsák;Michal Hájek

  • Testing a relict distributional pattern of fen plant and terrestrial snail species at the Holocene scale: a null model approach

    Michal Hájek;Michal Horsák;Lubomír Tichý;Petra Hájková

  • Prehistoric origin of extremely species-rich semi-drygrasslands in the Bílé Karpaty Mts.

    Petra Hájková;Jan Roleček;Michal Hájek;Michal Horsák

  • Prehistoric origin of the extremely species-rich semi-dry grasslands in the Bílé Karpaty Mts (Czech Republic and Slovakia).

    P. Hájková;J. Roleček;M. Hájek;M. Horsák

  • Habitats of relict terrestrial snails in southern Siberia: lessons for the reconstruction of palaeoenvironments of full‐glacial Europe

    Michal Horsák;Milan Chytrý;Beata M. Pokryszko;Jiří Danihelka;Jiří Danihelka

  • Land snail distribution patterns within a site: The role of different calcium sources

    Lucie Juřičková;Michal Horsák;Robert Cameron;Robert Cameron;Kristoffer Hylander

  • The age of island-like habitats impacts habitat specialist species richness.

    Michal Horsák;Michal Hájek;Daniel Spitale;Petra Hájková;Petra Hájková

  • Patterns of land-snail succession in Central Europe over the last 15,000 years: main changes along environmental, spatial and temporal gradients

    Lucie Juřičková;Michal Horsák;Jitka Horáčková;Vojtěch Abraham

  • MODERN DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS OF SNAILS AND PLANTS IN THE WESTERN CARPATHIAN SPRING FENS: IS IT A RESULT OF HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT?

    Michal Horsák;Michal Hájek;Michal Hájek;Daniel Dítě;Lubomír Tichý

  • Plant indicator values as a tool for land mollusc autecology assessment

    Michal Horsák;Michal Hájek;Michal Hájek;Lubomír Tichý;Lucie Juřičková

  • The relationship between plant species richness and soil pH vanishes with increasing aridity across Eurasian dry grasslands

    Salza Palpurina;Viktoria Wagner;Henrik von Wehrden;Michal Hájek

  • Mollusc diversity patterns in Central European fens: hotspots and conservation priorities

    Michal Horsák;Nicole Cernohorsky

  • The role of dispersal mode and habitat specialisation in metacommunity structuring of aquatic macroinvertebrates in isolated spring fens

    Vanda Rádková;Jindřiška Bojková;Vendula Křoupalová;Jana Schenková

  • Impact of reservoirs and channelization on lowland river macroinvertebrates: A case study from Central Europe

    Michal Horsák;Jindřiška Bojková;Světlana Zahrádková;Marie Omesová

  • Using multi-proxy palaeoecology to test a relict status of refugial populations of calcareous-fen species in the Western Carpathians

    Petra Hájková;Petra Hájková;Michal Horsák;Michal Hájek;Michal Hájek;Vlasta Jankovská;Vlasta Jankovská

  • The species richness–productivity relationship in the herb layer of European deciduous forests

    Irena Axmanová;Milan Chytrý;David Zelený;Ching-Feng Li

Frequent Co-Authors

Petra Hájková
Petra Hájková Masaryk University
Michal Hájek
Michal Hájek Masaryk University
Milan Chytrý
Milan Chytrý Masaryk University
Jiří Danihelka
Jiří Danihelka Masaryk University
Lubomír Tichý
Lubomír Tichý Masaryk University
Borja Jiménez-Alfaro
Borja Jiménez-Alfaro University of Oviedo
Thierry Backeljau
Thierry Backeljau Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences
Tim R. McClanahan
Tim R. McClanahan Wildlife Conservation Society
Ulrich Hambach
Ulrich Hambach University of Bayreuth
Norbert Hölzel
Norbert Hölzel University of Münster

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Ecology and Evolution, there are many related online degree options in the USA that open doors to diverse career pathways. Flexible online programs allow learners, including active-duty service members, to study from anywhere. Military friendly colleges are also making higher education more accessible for those with military backgrounds.

Many fields connected to environmental science, biology, and public health benefit from a multidisciplinary approach. Students may consider the best online MSW programs to prepare for impactful work in environmental social work or community health. Those who want to understand human behavior in ecosystem management might explore accelerated master's in psychology degrees.

There is also strong overlap between mental health and environmental sciences. Pursuing a master of mental health online can lead to careers supporting community well-being, often integrating ecological perspectives into counseling and public services.

Best Scientists Citing Michal Horsák

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles