World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
80
Citations
18907
World Ranking
1644
National Ranking
802

John W. Haycock publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John W. Haycock sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 229 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

John W. Haycock D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John W. Haycock sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

John W. Haycock is affiliated with the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on materials science and engineering, with significant contributions to biomaterials and biomedical engineering.

The scientist has published extensively in the areas of cellular and molecular neuroscience, molecular biology, and materials chemistry. Their research covers a range of topics including nerve injury and regeneration, electrospun nanofibers in biomedical applications, and bone tissue engineering materials. Additional subjects of study include graphene and nanomaterials applications, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, supramolecular self-assembly in materials, and silk-based biomaterials and applications.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with John W. Haycock include Caroline S. Taylor, Frederik Claeyssens, Ipsita Roy, Stuart A. Archer, and Jim A. Thomas. Their work appears regularly in several publication venues such as the Journal of the American Chemical Society, ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology), and The Cambridge Structural Database.

Some of the recent papers authored or coauthored by John W. Haycock are:

  • A Dinuclear Ruthenium(II) Complex Excited by Near-Infrared Light through Two-Photon Absorption Induces Phototoxicity Deep within Hypoxic Regions of Melanoma Cancer Spheroids, 2020, Journal of the American Chemical Society
  • Polyhydroxyalkanoates and their advances for biomedical applications, 2022, Trends in Molecular Medicine
  • A Tuneable, Photocurable, Poly(Caprolactone)-Based Resin for Tissue Engineering-Synthesis, Characterisation and Use in Stereolithography, 2021, Molecules
  • Harnessing Polyhydroxyalkanoates and Pressurized Gyration for Hard and Soft Tissue Engineering, 2021, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
  • UV-Casting on Methacrylated PCL for the Production of a Peripheral Nerve Implant Containing an Array of Porous Aligned Microchannels, 2020, Polymers

Best Publications

  • Striatal dopamine nerve terminal markers in human, chronic methamphetamine users

    Julie M. Wilson;Kathryn S. Kalasinsky;Allan I. Levey;Catherine Bergeron

  • ERK1 and ERK2, two microtubule-associated protein 2 kinases, mediate the phosphorylation of tyrosine hydroxylase at serine-31 in situ

    John W. Haycock;Natalie G. Ahn;Melanie H. Cobb;Edwin G. Krebs

  • Extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases (ERKs) and ERK kinase (MEK) in brain: regional distribution and regulation by chronic morphine

    J Ortiz;HW Harris;X Guitart;RZ Terwilliger

  • Phosphorylation of tyrosine hydroxylase in situ at serine 8, 19, 31, and 40.

    J W Haycock

  • Calcium/phospholipid-dependent protein kinase (protein kinase C) phosphorylates and activates tyrosine hydroxylase

    Katherine A. Albert;Elizabeth Helmer-Matyjek;Angus C. Nairn;Thomas H. Muller

  • Evidence for coexistence of GABA and dopamine in neurons of the rat olfactory bulb

    Christine M. Gall;Stewart H. C. Hendry;Kim B. Seroogy;Edward G. Jones

  • Phorbol Ester Enhancement of Neurotransmitter Release from Rat Brain Synaptosomes

    Robert A. Nichols;John W. Haycock;James K. T. Wang;Paul Greengard

  • Long-term increases in neurotransmitter release from neuronal cells expressing a constitutively active adenylate cyclase from a herpes simplex virus type 1 vector

    Alfred I. Geller;Mathew J. During;John W. Haycock;Andrew Freese

  • Distinct roles of dopamine D2L and D2S receptor isoforms in the regulation of protein phosphorylation at presynaptic and postsynaptic sites

    Niklas Lindgren;Alessandro Usiello;Michel Goiny;John Haycock

  • Stimulus‐secretion coupling processes in brain: analysis of noradrenaline and gamma‐aminobutyric acid release.

    C W Cotman;J W Haycock;W F White

  • Bovine adrenal chromaffin cells: high-yield purification and viability in suspension culture

    Jack C. Waymire;William F. Bennett;Richard Boehme;Linda Hankins

  • Synaptic Vesicle Transporter Expression Regulates Vesicle Phenotype and Quantal Size

    Emmanuel N. Pothos;Kristin E. Larsen;David E. Krantz;Yong-jian Liu

  • Marked disparity between age-related changes in dopamine and other presynaptic dopaminergic markers in human striatum

    John W. Haycock;Laurence Becker;Lee Ang;Yoshiaki Furukawa

  • Next Generation Nerve Guides: Materials, Fabrication, Growth Factors, and Cell Delivery

    Juliet H A Bell;John W Haycock

  • Tyrosine hydroxylase in rat brain dopaminergic nerve terminals. Multiple-site phosphorylation in vivo and in synaptosomes.

    J W Haycock;D A Haycock

  • Elevated Tyrosine Hydroxylase in the Locus Coeruleus of Suicide Victims

    Gregory A. Ordway;Karen Streator Smith;John W. Haycock

  • Differential regulation of tyrosine hydroxylase in the basal ganglia of mice lacking the dopamine transporter.

    Mohamed Jaber;Brigitte Dumartin;Corinne Sagné;John W. Haycock

  • Ventral mesencephalic neurons containing both cholecystokinin- and tyrosine hydroxylase-like immunoreactivities project to forebrain regions.

    Kim B. Seroogy;Karol Dangaran;Steven Lim;John W. Haycock

  • An aligned 3D neuronal-glial co-culture model for peripheral nerve studies.

    Muhammad F.B. Daud;Kiran C. Pawar;Frederik Claeyssens;Anthony J. Ryan

  • Elevated levels of tyrosine hydroxylase in the locus coeruleus in major depression.

    Meng Yang Zhu;Violetta Klimek;Ginny E. Dilley;John W. Haycock

  • Coordinate Regulation of the Cyclic AMP System with Firing Rate and Expression of Tyrosine Hydroxylase in the Rat Locus Coeruleus: Effects of Chronic Stress and Drug Treatments

    Kathleen R. Melia;Kurt Rasmussen;Rose Z. Terwilliger;John W. Haycock

  • Dopamine D(2) receptors regulate tyrosine hydroxylase activity and phosphorylation at Ser40 in rat striatum

    Niklas Lindgren;Zhi-Qing David Xu;Mario Herrera-Marschitz;John Haycock

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregory A. Ordway
Gregory A. Ordway University of Mississippi Medical Center
Stephen J. Kish
Stephen J. Kish Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Menek Goldstein
Menek Goldstein New York University
Eric J. Nestler
Eric J. Nestler Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Gilberto Fisone
Gilberto Fisone Karolinska Institute
David A. Lewis
David A. Lewis University of Pittsburgh
Tomas Hökfelt
Tomas Hökfelt Karolinska Institute
Yoshiaki Furukawa
Yoshiaki Furukawa Juntendo University
Michel Goiny
Michel Goiny Karolinska Institute
Melanie H. Cobb
Melanie H. Cobb The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens doors to a wide array of online degrees and career options in allied fields. If you're interested in combining neuroscience with social work, msw programs can prepare you for roles in mental health, advocacy, and research-driven support services.

For those who want a quicker start, a 2-year psychology degree online provides foundational knowledge applicable in various neuropsychological or behavioral fields.

For counseling-focused careers, consider programs that are rigorously vetted. Choosing from cacrep-accredited programs ensures your degree meets high professional and ethical standards.

Additionally, pursuing an online master's in counseling can lead to specialized careers supporting those with cognitive, behavioral, or emotional needs—directly complementing a neuroscience background.

These related online degrees can expand your expertise and boost your employability in healthcare, counseling, research, or therapy-driven environments.

Best Scientists Citing John W. Haycock

Trending Scientists