World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 101 7877 7406 449 431 1175 44432

Thomas J. Vogl publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas J. Vogl between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas J. Vogl published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 35.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 78 publications in 2023. 95 of the 1,432 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 78. Peak 78 publications in 2023. 1986: 3 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 4 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 15 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 11 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 17 publications 1997: 11 publications 1998: 21 publications 1999: 17 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 19 publications 2002: 33 publications 2003: 52 publications 2004: 65 publications 2005: 53 publications 2006: 45 publications 2007: 38 publications 2008: 45 publications 2009: 50 publications 2010: 50 publications 2011: 51 publications 2012: 65 publications 2013: 58 publications 2014: 53 publications 2015: 65 publications 2016: 64 publications 2017: 57 publications 2018: 52 publications 2019: 44 publications 2020: 41 publications 2021: 60 publications 2022: 46 publications 2023: 78 publications 2024: 61 publications 2025: 34 publications
1986 2025

1,432 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas J. Vogl: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 3
1987 1
1988 4
1989 6
1990 5
1991 10
1992 15
1993 8
1994 11
1995 12
1996 17
1997 11
1998 21
1999 17
2000 12
2001 19
2002 33
2003 52
2004 65
2005 53
2006 45
2007 38
2008 45
2009 50
2010 50
2011 51
2012 65
2013 58
2014 53
2015 65
2016 64
2017 57
2018 52
2019 44
2020 41
2021 60
2022 46
2023 78
2024 61
2025 34
Total 1,432
Download as CSV

Thomas J. Vogl publications per year - data summary

  • Thomas J. Vogl, a Medicine scholar from Goethe University Frankfurt, has 1,432 publications recorded across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1986 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2023, with 78 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1987, with 1 publication.
  • The rate of publication averages 35.8 papers per year over the whole span, or 35.8 per year counting only the 40 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 279 publications, 19% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1986-1999: 141 publications (10.1 per year); 2000-2013: 636 publications (45.4 per year); 2014-2025: 655 publications (54.6 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Thomas J. Vogl publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Vogl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 1,161–1,180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,175 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35 1,175
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas J. Vogl publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Thomas J. Vogl, a Medicine scholar from Goethe University Frankfurt, records 1,175 publications - the 97th percentile of the discipline.
  • 97% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Thomas J. Vogl, and about 3% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Thomas J. Vogl ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Thomas J. Vogl D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Vogl sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 100–101 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611 101
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Thomas J. Vogl D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Thomas J. Vogl, a Medicine scholar from Goethe University Frankfurt, records 101 D-Index - the 61st percentile of the discipline.
  • 61% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Thomas J. Vogl, and about 39% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Thomas J. Vogl ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Thomas J. Vogl is affiliated with Goethe University Frankfurt in Germany and has a significant record of research primarily within the field of Medicine. Their work predominantly focuses on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, with extensive contributions to related subfields such as Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Hepatology.

The researcher's publications demonstrate engagement with diverse topics including Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging, Radiation Dose and Imaging, Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis, Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications, Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, and MRI in cancer diagnosis.

Frequent publication venues for Thomas J. Vogl cover a range of specialized journals, noted for their focus on imaging and diagnostics. These include:

  • RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren
  • Diagnostics
  • Academic Radiology
  • European Journal of Radiology
  • European Radiology

The researcher has collaborated extensively with several co-authors, indicating an active participation in collaborative scientific communities. Frequent co-authors are:

  • Christian Booz
  • Simon S. Martin
  • Vitali Koch
  • İbrahim Yel
  • Katrin Eichler

Highlighted recent papers authored or co-authored by Thomas J. Vogl cover a range of research areas within medical imaging and diagnostics. Notable publications include:

  • Consensus Guidelines for the Definition of Time-to-Event End Points in Image-guided Tumor Ablation: Results of the SIO and DATECAN Initiative, 2021, Radiology
  • Long-term cardiac pathology in individuals with mild initial COVID-19 illness, 2022, Nature Medicine
  • Generative Adversarial Networks: A Primer for Radiologists, 2021, Radiographics
  • Joint Imaging Platform for Federated Clinical Data Analytics, 2020, JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
  • Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative dual-energy CT-based volumetric bone mineral density assessment for the prediction of osteoporosis-associated fractures, 2021, European Radiology

Best Publications

  • Prospective randomized study of doxorubicin-eluting-bead embolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: results of the PRECISION V study

    Johannes Lammer;Katarina Malagari;Thomas Vogl;Frank Pilleul

  • Transplantation of progenitor cells and regeneration enhancement in acute myocardial infarction: final one-year results of the TOPCARE-AMI Trial.

    Volker Schächinger;Birgit Assmus;Martina B. Britten;Jörg Honold

  • Image-guided Tumor Ablation: Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria—A 10-Year Update

    Muneeb Ahmed;Luigi Solbiati;Christopher L. Brace;David J. Breen

  • Infarct Remodeling After Intracoronary Progenitor Cell Treatment in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction (TOPCARE-AMI) Mechanistic Insights From Serial Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    M.B. Britten;N.D. Abolmaali;B. Assmus;R. Lehmann

  • Alarmins: awaiting a clinical response.

    James K. Chan;Johannes Roth;Joost J. Oppenheim;Kevin J. Tracey

  • Image-guided tumor ablation: proposal for standardization of terms and reporting criteria

    S. Nahum Goldberg;J. William Charboneau;Gerald D. Dodd;Damian E. Dupuy

  • Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria.

    S. Nahum Goldberg;Clement J. Grassi;John F. Cardella;J. William Charboneau

  • Psoriasis : a possible risk factor for development of coronary artery calcification

    Ralf J. Ludwig;C. Herzog;A. Rostock;Falk Rudiger Ochsendorf

  • Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria--a 10-year update.

    Muneeb Ahmed;Luigi Solbiati;Christopher L. Brace;David J. Breen

  • Improved detection of focal liver lesions at MR imaging: multicenter comparison of Gadoxetic acid–enhanced MR images with intraoperative findings.

    Alexander Huppertz;Thomas Balzer;Anthony Blakeborough;Josy Breuer

  • Techniques for the detection of coronary atherosclerosis: multi-detector row CT coronary angiography.

    Thomas J. Vogl;Nasreddin D. Abolmaali;Thomas Diebold;Kerstin Engelmann

  • Colorectal carcinoma metastases in liver: laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy--local tumor control rate and survival data.

    Thomas J. Vogl;Ralf Straub;Katrin Eichler;Oliver Söllner

  • Diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid (Primovist)-enhanced MRI and spiral CT for a therapeutic strategy: comparison with intraoperative and histopathologic findings in focal liver lesions

    Renate Hammerstingl;Alexander Huppertz;Josy Breuer;Thomas Balzer

  • Expression of the pro-inflammatory protein S100A12 (EN-RAGE) in rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis

    D Foell;D Kane;B Bresnihan;T Vogl

  • Malignant liver tumors treated with MR imaging-guided laser-induced thermotherapy: experience with complications in 899 patients (2,520 lesions).

    Thomas J Vogl;Ralf Straub;Katrin Eichler;Dirk Woitaschek

  • Cervical lymphadenopathy: ratio of long- to short-axis diameter as a predictor of malignancy

    H J Steinkamp;M Cornehl;N Hosten;W Pegios

  • Thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases: a position paper by an international panel of ablation experts, the interventional oncology sans frontières meeting 2013

    Alice Gillams;Nahum Goldberg;Muneeb Ahmed;Reto Bale

  • Transcatheter Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Doxorubicin-loaded DC Bead (DEBDOX): Technical Recommendations

    Riccardo Lencioni;Thierry De Baere;Marta Burrel;James G. Caridi

  • Quantitative assessment of cartilage status in osteoarthritis by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: technical validation for use in analysis of cartilage volume and further morphologic parameters.

    Heiko Graichen;Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe;Thomas Vogl;Karl-Hans Englmeier

  • Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: Influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality

    Christopher Herzog;Maric Arning-Erb;Stefan Zangos;Kathrin Eichler

Frequent Co-Authors

Johannes Roth
Johannes Roth University of Münster
U. Joseph Schoepf
U. Joseph Schoepf Medical University of South Carolina
Wolf O. Bechstein
Wolf O. Bechstein Goethe University Frankfurt
Eike Nagel
Eike Nagel Goethe University Frankfurt
Dirk Foell
Dirk Foell University of Münster
Riccardo Lencioni
Riccardo Lencioni University of Pisa
Stefan Zeuzem
Stefan Zeuzem Goethe University Frankfurt
Andreas M. Zeiher
Andreas M. Zeiher Goethe University Frankfurt
Johannes Lammer
Johannes Lammer Medical University of Vienna
Clemens Sorg
Clemens Sorg University of Münster

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in medicine but want flexible options, a variety of related online degrees and pathways can help broaden your opportunities within the healthcare sector. Accredited online programs allow you to study from home, balance professional commitments, and tailor your learning experience to suit your goals.

For those interested in healthcare administration, cahme accredited online mha programs ensure high educational standards and career readiness in managerial roles. Registered nurses seeking career advancement without on-site requirements can explore rn to bsn online with no clinicals to earn their bachelor’s degree in a fully online format.

If you aspire to move into advanced clinical practice, accelerated dnp programs online and dnp online programs offer flexible, streamlined routes to earning a doctorate in nursing practice, with some options designed for quick completion.

Online healthcare degrees make it easier than ever to advance your medical career, expand your skills, and respond to the changing needs of the industry.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas J. Vogl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles