World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
101
Citations
44432
World Ranking
7878
National Ranking
448

Thomas J. Vogl publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Vogl sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,175 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Thomas J. Vogl D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas J. Vogl sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas J. Vogl is affiliated with Goethe University Frankfurt in Germany and has a significant record of research primarily within the field of Medicine. Their work predominantly focuses on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, with extensive contributions to related subfields such as Biomedical Engineering, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Hepatology.

The researcher's publications demonstrate engagement with diverse topics including Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging, Radiation Dose and Imaging, Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging, Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis, Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications, Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics, and MRI in cancer diagnosis.

Frequent publication venues for Thomas J. Vogl cover a range of specialized journals, noted for their focus on imaging and diagnostics. These include:

  • RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren
  • Diagnostics
  • Academic Radiology
  • European Journal of Radiology
  • European Radiology

The researcher has collaborated extensively with several co-authors, indicating an active participation in collaborative scientific communities. Frequent co-authors are:

  • Christian Booz
  • Simon S. Martin
  • Vitali Koch
  • İbrahim Yel
  • Katrin Eichler

Highlighted recent papers authored or co-authored by Thomas J. Vogl cover a range of research areas within medical imaging and diagnostics. Notable publications include:

  • Consensus Guidelines for the Definition of Time-to-Event End Points in Image-guided Tumor Ablation: Results of the SIO and DATECAN Initiative, 2021, Radiology
  • Long-term cardiac pathology in individuals with mild initial COVID-19 illness, 2022, Nature Medicine
  • Generative Adversarial Networks: A Primer for Radiologists, 2021, Radiographics
  • Joint Imaging Platform for Federated Clinical Data Analytics, 2020, JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
  • Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative dual-energy CT-based volumetric bone mineral density assessment for the prediction of osteoporosis-associated fractures, 2021, European Radiology

Best Publications

  • Prospective randomized study of doxorubicin-eluting-bead embolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: results of the PRECISION V study

    Johannes Lammer;Katarina Malagari;Thomas Vogl;Frank Pilleul

  • Transplantation of progenitor cells and regeneration enhancement in acute myocardial infarction: final one-year results of the TOPCARE-AMI Trial.

    Volker Schächinger;Birgit Assmus;Martina B. Britten;Jörg Honold

  • Image-guided Tumor Ablation: Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria—A 10-Year Update

    Muneeb Ahmed;Luigi Solbiati;Christopher L. Brace;David J. Breen

  • Infarct Remodeling After Intracoronary Progenitor Cell Treatment in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction (TOPCARE-AMI) Mechanistic Insights From Serial Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    M.B. Britten;N.D. Abolmaali;B. Assmus;R. Lehmann

  • Alarmins: awaiting a clinical response.

    James K. Chan;Johannes Roth;Joost J. Oppenheim;Kevin J. Tracey

  • Image-guided tumor ablation: proposal for standardization of terms and reporting criteria

    S. Nahum Goldberg;J. William Charboneau;Gerald D. Dodd;Damian E. Dupuy

  • Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria.

    S. Nahum Goldberg;Clement J. Grassi;John F. Cardella;J. William Charboneau

  • Psoriasis : a possible risk factor for development of coronary artery calcification

    Ralf J. Ludwig;C. Herzog;A. Rostock;Falk Rudiger Ochsendorf

  • Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria--a 10-year update.

    Muneeb Ahmed;Luigi Solbiati;Christopher L. Brace;David J. Breen

  • Improved detection of focal liver lesions at MR imaging: multicenter comparison of Gadoxetic acid–enhanced MR images with intraoperative findings.

    Alexander Huppertz;Thomas Balzer;Anthony Blakeborough;Josy Breuer

  • Techniques for the detection of coronary atherosclerosis: multi-detector row CT coronary angiography.

    Thomas J. Vogl;Nasreddin D. Abolmaali;Thomas Diebold;Kerstin Engelmann

  • Colorectal carcinoma metastases in liver: laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy--local tumor control rate and survival data.

    Thomas J. Vogl;Ralf Straub;Katrin Eichler;Oliver Söllner

  • Diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid (Primovist)-enhanced MRI and spiral CT for a therapeutic strategy: comparison with intraoperative and histopathologic findings in focal liver lesions

    Renate Hammerstingl;Alexander Huppertz;Josy Breuer;Thomas Balzer

  • Expression of the pro-inflammatory protein S100A12 (EN-RAGE) in rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis

    D Foell;D Kane;B Bresnihan;T Vogl

  • Malignant liver tumors treated with MR imaging-guided laser-induced thermotherapy: experience with complications in 899 patients (2,520 lesions).

    Thomas J Vogl;Ralf Straub;Katrin Eichler;Dirk Woitaschek

  • Cervical lymphadenopathy: ratio of long- to short-axis diameter as a predictor of malignancy

    H J Steinkamp;M Cornehl;N Hosten;W Pegios

  • Thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases: a position paper by an international panel of ablation experts, the interventional oncology sans frontières meeting 2013

    Alice Gillams;Nahum Goldberg;Muneeb Ahmed;Reto Bale

  • Transcatheter Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Doxorubicin-loaded DC Bead (DEBDOX): Technical Recommendations

    Riccardo Lencioni;Thierry De Baere;Marta Burrel;James G. Caridi

  • Quantitative assessment of cartilage status in osteoarthritis by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: technical validation for use in analysis of cartilage volume and further morphologic parameters.

    Heiko Graichen;Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe;Thomas Vogl;Karl-Hans Englmeier

  • Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: Influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality

    Christopher Herzog;Maric Arning-Erb;Stefan Zangos;Kathrin Eichler

Frequent Co-Authors

Johannes Roth
Johannes Roth University of Münster
U. Joseph Schoepf
U. Joseph Schoepf Medical University of South Carolina
Wolf O. Bechstein
Wolf O. Bechstein Goethe University Frankfurt
Eike Nagel
Eike Nagel Goethe University Frankfurt
Dirk Foell
Dirk Foell University of Münster
Riccardo Lencioni
Riccardo Lencioni University of Pisa
Stefan Zeuzem
Stefan Zeuzem Goethe University Frankfurt
Andreas M. Zeiher
Andreas M. Zeiher Goethe University Frankfurt
Johannes Lammer
Johannes Lammer Medical University of Vienna
Clemens Sorg
Clemens Sorg University of Münster

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in medicine but want flexible options, a variety of related online degrees and pathways can help broaden your opportunities within the healthcare sector. Accredited online programs allow you to study from home, balance professional commitments, and tailor your learning experience to suit your goals.

For those interested in healthcare administration, cahme accredited online mha programs ensure high educational standards and career readiness in managerial roles. Registered nurses seeking career advancement without on-site requirements can explore rn to bsn online with no clinicals to earn their bachelor’s degree in a fully online format.

If you aspire to move into advanced clinical practice, accelerated dnp programs online and dnp online programs offer flexible, streamlined routes to earning a doctorate in nursing practice, with some options designed for quick completion.

Online healthcare degrees make it easier than ever to advance your medical career, expand your skills, and respond to the changing needs of the industry.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas J. Vogl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles