World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
85
Citations
28597
World Ranking
14534
National Ranking
75

Johannes Lammer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johannes Lammer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 414 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Johannes Lammer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Johannes Lammer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Johannes Lammer is affiliated with the Medical University of Vienna in Austria. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with significant contributions in Surgery, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Hepatology, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The scientist has explored a range of topics in their work, including Peripheral Artery Disease Management, Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics, Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis, Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies, Radiation Dose and Imaging, Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes, and Radiology practices and education.

Johannes Lammer's recent papers include the following publications:

  • Early tumor shrinkage and response assessment according to mRECIST predict overall survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients under sorafenib, 2022, Cancer Imaging
  • Radiation Safety Performance is More than Simply Measuring Doses! Development of a Radiation Safety Rating Scale, 2020, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
  • Commentary: Bioresorbable Drug-Eluting Scaffold for Peripheral Artery Disease: The Best of Two Worlds or Unnecessary?, 2020, Journal of Endovascular Therapy
  • Reply to: Commentary to Josef Tacke, et al. The Randomized Freeway Stent Study: Drug-Eluting Balloons Outperform Standard Balloon Angioplasty for Postdilatation of Nitinol Stents in the SFA and PI Segment, 2020, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
  • Outcome of amniotic membrane transplantation for corneal diseases in a tertiary referral center, 2025, Expert Review of Ophthalmology

Frequent publication venues for Lammer include:

  • CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology
  • Cancer Imaging
  • Journal of Endovascular Therapy
  • Expert Review of Ophthalmology

The scientist often collaborates with other researchers, including Osman Öcal, Regina Schinner, Kerstin Schütte, Enrico N. De Toni, and Christian Loewe.

Best Publications

  • Prospective randomized study of doxorubicin-eluting-bead embolization in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: results of the PRECISION V study

    Johannes Lammer;Katarina Malagari;Thomas Vogl;Frank Pilleul

  • Balloon Angioplasty versus Implantation of Nitinol Stents in the Superficial Femoral Artery

    Martin Schillinger;Schila Sabeti;Christian Loewe;Petra Dick

  • Endoluminal stent-grafts for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms

    Ulrich Blum;Götz Voshage;Johannes Lammer;Friedhelm Beyersdorf

  • Nitinol Stent Implantation Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Lesions in the Superficial Femoral Artery and Proximal Popliteal Artery Twelve-Month Results From the RESILIENT Randomized Trial

    John R. Laird;Barry T. Katzen;Dierk Scheinert;Johannes Lammer

  • Sustained Benefit at 2 Years of Primary Femoropopliteal Stenting Compared With Balloon Angioplasty With Optional Stenting

    Martin Schillinger;Schila Sabeti;Petra Dick;Jasmin Amighi

  • Drug-eluting and bare nitinol stents for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the superficial femoral artery: long-term results from the SIROCCO trial.

    Stephan H. Duda;Stephan H. Duda;Marc Bosiers;Johannes Lammer;Dierk Scheinert

  • Sirolimus-Eluting versus Bare Nitinol Stent for Obstructive Superficial Femoral Artery Disease: The SIROCCO II Trial

    Stephan H. Duda;Marc Bosiers;Johannes Lammer;Dierk Scheinert

  • Child-Pugh versus MELD score in predicting survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

    B Angermayr;M Cejna;F Karnel;M Gschwantler

  • Endovascular Repair of Acute Uncomplicated Aortic Type B Dissection Promotes Aortic Remodelling: 1 Year Results of the ADSORB Trial

    J. Brunkwall;P. Kasprzak;E. Verhoeven;R. Heijmen

  • A systematic review of the effectiveness of revascularization of the ulcerated foot in patients with diabetes and peripheral arterial disease

    R. J. Hinchliffe;G. Andros;Jan Apelqvist;K. Bakker

  • Nitinol stent implantation vs. balloon angioplasty for lesions in the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries of patients with claudication: three-year follow-up from the RESILIENT randomized trial.

    John R. Laird;Barry T. Katzen;Dierk Scheinert;Johannes Lammer

  • PTA versus Palmaz stent placement in femoropopliteal artery obstructions: a multicenter prospective randomized study.

    Manfred Cejna;Siegfried Thurnher;Herbert Illiasch;Werner Horvath

  • Balloon angioplasty versus stenting with nitinol stents in intermediate length superficial femoral artery lesions.

    Petra Dick;Hubert Wallner;Schila Sabeti;Christian Loewe

  • Common bile duct obstruction due to malignancy: treatment with plastic versus metal stents.

    J Lammer;K A Hausegger;F Flückiger;F W Winkelbauer

  • Heparin-Bonded Covered Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents for Complex Femoropopliteal Artery Lesions: The Randomized VIASTAR Trial (Viabahn Endoprosthesis With PROPATEN Bioactive Surface [VIA] Versus Bare Nitinol Stent in the Treatment of Long Lesions in Superficial Femoral Artery Occlusive Disease)

    Johannes Lammer;Thomas Zeller;Klaus A. Hausegger;Philipp J. Schaefer

  • A prospective randomized multicenter comparison of balloon angioplasty and infrapopliteal stenting with the sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with ischemic peripheral arterial disease: 1-year results from the ACHILLES trial.

    Dierk Scheinert;Konstantinos Katsanos;Thomas Zeller;Renate Koppensteiner

  • Transcatheter Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Doxorubicin-loaded DC Bead (DEBDOX): Technical Recommendations

    Riccardo Lencioni;Thierry De Baere;Marta Burrel;James G. Caridi

  • Nitinol stent implantation in long superficial femoral artery lesions: 12-month results of the DURABILITY I study.

    Marc Bosiers;Giovanni Torsello;Hans-Martin Gissler;Johannes Ruef

  • Balloon angioplasty versus implantation of nitinol stents in the superficial femoral artery

    M. Schillinger;S. Sabeti;C. Loewe

  • Transcatheter Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Doxorubicin-loaded DC Bead (DEBDOX): Technical

    R. Lencioni;T. de Baere;J. G. Caridi;J. Lammer

Frequent Co-Authors

Ernst Wolner
Ernst Wolner Medical University of Vienna
Erich Minar
Erich Minar Medical University of Vienna
Thomas Zeller
Thomas Zeller University of Freiburg
Markus Peck-Radosavljevic
Markus Peck-Radosavljevic Klinikum Klagenfurt
Thomas J. Vogl
Thomas J. Vogl Goethe University Frankfurt
Riccardo Lencioni
Riccardo Lencioni University of Pisa
Klaus Wolff
Klaus Wolff Medical University of Vienna
Alexander L. Gerbes
Alexander L. Gerbes Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Alexandra J. Lansky
Alexandra J. Lansky Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a medical career in the USA offers a wealth of online options for advancing your qualifications. Many nursing professionals are turning to the rn to np bridge program as a flexible path to become a nurse practitioner without starting from scratch. These bridge programs streamline the journey for registered nurses aiming for higher expertise and responsibility.

For those interested in health beyond clinical practice, an online bachelor's degree in nutrition provides foundational knowledge for roles in dietetics, wellness coaching, or public health.

Administrative professionals may consider the cahme accredited online mha programs list to discover reputable programs that prepare graduates for leadership roles in healthcare management. Accreditation ensures your degree meets industry standards and increases employability.

Finally, some programs offer innovative formats, such as rn bsn online programs no clinicals, allowing registered nurses to advance academically without on-site requirements. These options make higher education more accessible while balancing work and personal commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Johannes Lammer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles