World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
5192
World Ranking
8932
National Ranking
4736

George F. Michel publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George F. Michel sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 100 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

George F. Michel D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George F. Michel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1998 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

George F. Michel is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Greensboro in the United States. Their research spans medicine and psychology, with focused engagement in developmental and educational psychology as well as cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist's work often intersects the study of hemispheric asymmetry in neuroscience and child development. They have contributed notably to topics including hemispheric asymmetry in neuroscience, child and animal learning development, children's physical and motor development, hearing impairment and communication, infant development and preterm care, surgical site infection prevention, and vascular procedures and complications.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with George F. Michel include:

  • Emily C. Marcinowski
  • Julie M. Campbell
  • Eliza L. Nelson
  • Stefany Coxe
  • Iryna Babik

Their publications commonly appear in several venues, emphasizing developmental psychobiology and symmetry, among others. Common publication venues include:

  • Developmental Psychobiology
  • UNC Libraries
  • Symmetry
  • American Journal of Medical Case Reports
  • Cureus

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by George F. Michel are:

  • Handedness Development: A Model for Investigating the Development of Hemispheric Specialization and Interhemispheric Coordination, 2021, Symmetry
  • Preschool language ability is predicted by toddler hand preference trajectories., 2020, Developmental Psychology
  • A perspective on the development of hemispheric specialization, infant handedness, and cerebral palsy, 2020, Cortex
  • Handedness Development: A Model for Investigating the Development of Hemispheric Specialization and Interhemispheric Coordination, 2021, Preprints.org
  • THE INCIDENCE OF ALCOHOL USE DISORDERS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC, 2022, Psychiatria Danubina

George F. Michel was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1998, reflecting a formal acknowledgment within their field.

Best Publications

  • Right-handedness: a consequence of infant supine head-orientation preference?

    George F. Michel

  • Rate and timing precision of motor coordination in Developmental Dyslexia.

    Peter H. Wolff;George F. Michel;Marsha Ovrut;Charles Drake

  • Developmental Psychobiology: An Interdisciplinary Science

    George F. Michel;Celia L. Moore

  • Restricting the field of view: perceptual and performance effects.

    Patricia L. Alfano;George F. Michel

  • Postural and lateral asymmetries in the ontogeny of handedness during infancy

    George F. Michel;Debra A. Harkins

  • How supine postural preferences of infants can contribute toward the development of handedness

    Jane F. Coryell;George F. Michel

  • RATE VARIABLES AND AUTOMATIZED NAMING IN DEVELOPMENTAL DYSLEXIA

    Peter H. Wolff;George F. Michel;Marsha Ovrut

  • Hand-use preference for reaching and object manipulation in 6- through 13-month-old infants.

    George F. Michel;Marsha R. Ovrut;Debra A. Harkins

  • A meta-analysis of primate hand preferences, particularly for reaching.

    Eros Papademetriou;Ching Fan Sheu;George F. Michel;George F. Michel

  • Critical period: a history of the transition from questions of when, to what, to how.

    George F. Michel;Amber N. Tyler

  • The timing of syllable repetitions in developmental dyslexia.

    Peter H. Wolff;George F. Michel;Marsha Ovrut

  • Intrauterine birth position predicts newborn supine head position preferences

    George F. Michel;Rhoda Goodwin

  • Unimanual to bimanual: Tracking the development of handedness from 6 to 24 months

    Eliza L. Nelson;Julie M. Campbell;George F. Michel;George F. Michel

  • Infant hand-use preferences for grasping objects contributes to the development of a hand-use preference for manipulating objects.

    Trisha Hinojosa;Ching-Fan Sheu;George F. Michel

  • DO INFANTS EXPRESS DISCRETE EMOTIONS? ADULT JUDGMENTS OF FACIAL, VOCAL, AND BODY ACTIONS

    Linda A. Camras;Jean Sullivan;George Michel

  • The manifestation of infant hand‐use preferences when reaching for objects during the seven‐ to thirteen‐month age period

    George F. Michel;Amber N. Tyler;Claudio Ferre;Ching-Fan Sheu

  • Bimanual role differentiated toy play during infancy.

    Marliese Kimmerle;Laura A. Mick;George F. Michel

  • Evidence of a right-shift factor affecting infant hand-use preferences from 7 to 11 months of age as revealed by latent class analysis

    George F. Michel;Ching-Fan Sheu;Michele R. Brumley

  • Development of Infant Prehension Handedness: A Longitudinal Analysis During the 6- to 14-month Age Period.

    Claudio L. Ferre;Iryna Babik;George F. Michel

  • Development of role-differentiated bimanual manipulation during the infant's first year

    Marliese Kimmerle;Claudio L. Ferre;Kathleen A. Kotwica;George F. Michel

  • Listening to Maternal Story Telling Affects Narrative Skill of 5-Year-Old Children

    Debra A. Harkins;Patrice E. Koch;George F. Michel

  • Infant “surprise” expressions as coordinative motor structures

    Linda A. Camras;Linda Lambrecht;George F. Michel

Frequent Co-Authors

Benoist Schaal
Benoist Schaal University of Burgundy

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degrees and career options. Many students interested in helping professions consider becoming social workers. The path to becoming a social worker generally involves earning a recognized degree, completing supervised fieldwork, and meeting state-specific licensing requirements.

For example, Kansas social work license requirements detail the educational prerequisites and exams needed for aspiring professionals. Similarly, those exploring requirements to be a social worker in Kentucky must adhere to state-specific rules.

If you're looking at careers in Louisiana, it's essential to understand how to become a social worker in Louisiana, including local licensing steps. Likewise, checking the Maine social work license requirements is crucial for those aiming to practice in that state.

With flexible online degree programs, students can gain the skills and credentials necessary for rewarding roles in counseling, social work, and mental health support across the country.

Best Scientists Citing George F. Michel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles