World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
21984
World Ranking
16248
National Ranking
83

Ernst Wolner publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ernst Wolner sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 754 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ernst Wolner D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ernst Wolner sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ernst Wolner is affiliated with the Medical University of Vienna in Austria. Their research focus lies primarily within the Arts and Humanities, with a particular emphasis on History. More specifically, their subfield of study is History, through which they contribute academic work relating to medical history and innovations.

The scientist's recent work includes a publication titled History of surgery at the University of Vienna, published in 2024 in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift. This paper has garnered citations, indicating engagement within the academic community. The research topics encompassed by their work include:

  • Medical History and Innovations
  • Medical History and Research
  • History of Medicine Studies

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Laurenz Wolner
  • Paula Höfinger

Ernst Wolner's publications primarily appear in the Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, which is listed as a frequent venue for their work. This aligns with the thematic concentration on medical history and the academic context of Vienna.

The body of research produced by Ernst Wolner reflects an interdisciplinary approach centered on the historical dimensions of medicine, providing insights into medical advancements and the institution's legacy through documented historical analysis.

Best Publications

  • Early failure of the tissue engineered porcine heart valve SYNERGRAFT in pediatric patients.

    P. Simon;M.T. Kasimir;G. Seebacher;G. Weigel

  • Transapical Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Implantation Multicenter Experience

    Thomas Walther;Paul Simon;Todd Dewey;Gerhard Wimmer-Greinecker

  • Decellularization protocols of porcine heart valves differ importantly in efficiency of cell removal and susceptibility of the matrix to recellularization with human vascular cells

    Erwin Rieder;Marie-Theres Kasimir;Gerd Silberhumer;Gernot Seebacher

  • One year follow-up of the multi-centre European PARTNER transcatheter heart valve study

    Thierry Lefèvre;Ari Pieter Kappetein;Ernst Wolner;Patrick Nataf

  • Variable platelet response to low-dose ASA and the risk of limb deterioration in patients submitted to peripheral arterial angioplasty.

    Michael Rolf Mueller;Andreas Salat;Petra Stangl;Marco Murabito

  • Comparison of different decellularization procedures of porcine heart valves

    Kasimir Mt;Rieder E;Seebacher G;Silberhumer G

  • Inflammatory response and myocardial injury following coronary artery bypass grafting with or without cardiopulmonary bypass.

    Martin Czerny;Harald Baumer;Juliane Kilo;Andrea Lassnigg

  • Alpha-Gal on bioprostheses: xenograft immune response in cardiac surgery.

    K. Z. Konakci;B. Bohle;R. Blumer;W. Hoetzenecker

  • Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation with off-pump, epicardial, high-intensity focused ultrasound: results of a multicenter trial.

    Jean Ninet;Xavier Roques;Rainald Seitelberger;Claude Deville

  • Endovascular stent graft repair for aneurysms on the descending thoracic aorta

    Marek Ehrlich;Martin Grabenwoeger;Fabiola Cartes-Zumelzu;Michael Grimm

  • First Clinical Experience With the DeBakey VAD Continuous-Axial-Flow Pump for Bridge to Transplantation

    Georg M. Wieselthaler;Heinrich Schima;Michael Hiesmayr;Richard Pacher

  • The vacuum-assisted closure system for the treatment of deep sternal wound infections after cardiac surgery.

    Tatjana M Fleck;Michael Fleck;Reinhard Moidl;Martin Czerny

  • Thoracic aortic aneurysms: treatment with endovascular self-expandable stent grafts.

    Martin Grabenwöger;Doris Hutschala;Marek P Ehrlich;Fabiola Cartes-Zumelzu

  • Increased levels of soluble ST2 protein and IgG1 production in patients with sepsis and trauma

    Markus Brunner;Claus Krenn;Georg Roth;Bernhard Moser

  • Complete revascularization in coronary artery bypass grafting with and without cardiopulmonary bypass.

    Martin Czerny;Harald Baumer;Juliane Kilo;Andreas Zuckermann

  • Blood platelets in cardiopulmonary bypass operations. Recovery occurs after initial stimulation, rather than continual activation.

    P. Zilla;R. Fasol;P. Groscurth;W. Klepetko

  • Long-Term Results After Repeated Surgical Removal of Pulmonary Metastases

    Daniela Kandioler;Elisabeth Krömer;Heinz Tüchler;Adelheid End

  • Tissue Engineering of Heart Valves: Decellularized Porcine and Human Valve Scaffolds Differ Importantly in Residual Potential to Attract Monocytic Cells

    Erwin Rieder;Gernot Seebacher;Marie-Theres Kasimir;Eva Eichmair

  • Perioperative risk factors for mortality in patients with acute type A aortic dissection.

    M Ehrlich;W C Fang;M Grabenwöger;F Cartes-Zumelzu

  • Decellularization does not eliminate thrombogenicity and inflammatory stimulation in tissue-engineered porcine heart valves.

    Marie-Theres Kasimir;Erwin Rieder;Gernot Seebacher;Anneliese Nigisch

Frequent Co-Authors

Walter Klepetko
Walter Klepetko Medical University of Vienna
Johannes Lammer
Johannes Lammer Medical University of Vienna
Bernhard Moser
Bernhard Moser Cardiff University
George Boltz-Nitulescu
George Boltz-Nitulescu Medical University of Vienna
Martin Czerny
Martin Czerny University of Freiburg
Mathias Müller
Mathias Müller University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
Antonio Giordano
Antonio Giordano Temple University
Markus Müller
Markus Müller Medical University of Vienna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a medical career in the USA opens doors to a diverse range of related online study options and career pathways. For those looking to specialize in mental health, a msn to pmhnp online can fast-track your progress toward becoming a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner.

If you are interested in healthcare management, an affordable healthcare administration degree online is an excellent option for gaining essential business knowledge in healthcare settings. For further specialization, consider exploring the cheapest master's in healthcare administration programs, which can enhance your qualifications and career prospects.

Advanced practice nurses who wish to reach the highest level of clinical proficiency may benefit from the cheapest dnp online programs. These flexible online degrees enable medical professionals to balance work, study, and life while advancing their careers.

Best Scientists Citing Ernst Wolner

Recently Published Articles