World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 79 17420 16368 8720 8056 565 27813

Stephen B. Solomon publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stephen B. Solomon between 1954 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stephen B. Solomon published across 73 years, from 1954 to 2026, averaging 9.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 85 publications in 2023. 21 of the 672 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1954 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 85. Peak 85 publications in 2023. 1954: 2 publications 1955: 0 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 2 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 5 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 4 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 23 publications 2011: 27 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 41 publications 2014: 49 publications 2015: 38 publications 2016: 42 publications 2017: 33 publications 2018: 30 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 30 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 85 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 20 publications 2026: 1 publication
1954 2026

672 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stephen B. Solomon: publications per year, 1954 to 2026
Year Publications
1954 2
1955 0
1956 0
1957 0
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 1
1971 1
1972 0
1973 0
1974 1
1975 0
1976 2
1977 1
1978 2
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 2
1984 1
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 3
1989 1
1990 1
1991 1
1992 5
1993 0
1994 3
1995 0
1996 1
1997 1
1998 1
1999 4
2000 3
2001 6
2002 9
2003 7
2004 6
2005 14
2006 16
2007 9
2008 17
2009 6
2010 23
2011 27
2012 24
2013 41
2014 49
2015 38
2016 42
2017 33
2018 30
2019 26
2020 30
2021 29
2022 20
2023 85
2024 26
2025 20
2026 1
Total 672
Download as CSV

Stephen B. Solomon publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen B. Solomon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 561–580 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 565 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504 565
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Stephen B. Solomon D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen B. Solomon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 79
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Stephen B. Solomon is affiliated with the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of medicine, with a focus on multiple subfields including pulmonary and respiratory medicine, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, oncology, hepatology, and biomedical engineering.

Their work extensively covers topics such as hepatocellular carcinoma treatment and prognosis, lung cancer diagnosis and treatment, radiomics and machine learning in medical imaging, medical imaging and pathology studies, advanced radiotherapy techniques, lung cancer treatments and mutations, and broader cancer research and treatments.

Among recent publications authored by Stephen B. Solomon are:

  • A Phase I Trial of Regional Mesothelin-Targeted CAR T-cell Therapy in Patients with Malignant Pleural Disease, in Combination with the Anti-PD-1 Agent Pembrolizumab (2021, Cancer Discovery)
  • Radiotheranostics: a roadmap for future development (2020, The Lancet Oncology)
  • Consensus Guidelines for the Definition of Time-to-Event End Points in Image-guided Tumor Ablation: Results of the SIO and DATECAN Initiative (2021, Radiology)
  • Intratumoral Injection of Clostridium novyi-NT Spores in Patients with Treatment-refractory Advanced Solid Tumors (2020, Clinical Cancer Research)
  • Multicenter Study of Metastatic Lung Tumors Targeted by Interventional Cryoablation Evaluation (SOLSTICE) (2020, Journal of Thoracic Oncology)

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Etay Ziv
  • Hooman Yarmohammadi
  • Constantinos T. Sofocleous
  • Elena N. Petre
  • Joseph P. Erinjeri

Their scholarly output has been published in several key venues, among which the most frequent are:

  • Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Radiology
  • Clinical Cancer Research
  • Techniques in Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Best Publications

  • Integrative clinical genomics of advanced prostate cancer

    Dan Robinson;Eliezer M. Van Allen;Eliezer M. Van Allen;Yi Mi Wu;Nikolaus Schultz

  • Organoid cultures derived from patients with advanced prostate cancer

    Dong Gao;Ian Vela;Andrea Sboner;Phillip J Iaquinta

  • Image-guided Tumor Ablation: Standardization of Terminology and Reporting Criteria—A 10-Year Update

    Muneeb Ahmed;Luigi Solbiati;Christopher L. Brace;David J. Breen

  • Rebiopsy of Lung Cancer Patients with Acquired Resistance to EGFR Inhibitors and Enhanced Detection of the T790M Mutation Using a Locked Nucleic Acid-Based Assay

    Maria E. Arcila;Geoffrey R. Oxnard;Khedoudja Nafa;Gregory J. Riely

  • A Phase I Trial of Regional Mesothelin-Targeted CAR T-cell Therapy in Patients with Malignant Pleural Disease, in Combination with the Anti-PD-1 Agent Pembrolizumab.

    Prasad S. Adusumilli;Marjorie G. Zauderer;Isabelle Rivière;Stephen B. Solomon

  • Erratum: Integrative Clinical Genomics of Advanced Prostate Cancer

    Dan Robinson;Eliezer M. Van Allen;Yi Mi Wu;Nikolaus Schultz

  • Prospective Genomic Profiling of Prostate Cancer Across Disease States Reveals Germline and Somatic Alterations That May Affect Clinical Decision Making.

    Wassim Abida;Joshua Armenia;Anuradha Gopalan;Ryan Brennan

  • Image-guided tumor ablation: standardization of terminology and reporting criteria--a 10-year update.

    Muneeb Ahmed;Luigi Solbiati;Christopher L. Brace;David J. Breen

  • Local therapy with continued EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy as a treatment strategy in EGFR mutant advanced lung cancers that have developed acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors

    Helena A. Yu;Camelia S. Sima;James Huang;Stephen B. Solomon

  • Randomized Trial of Hepatic Artery Embolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Doxorubicin-Eluting Microspheres Compared With Embolization With Microspheres Alone

    Karen T. Brown;Richard K. Do;Mithat Gonen;Anne M. Covey

  • Potent Induction of Tumor Immunity by Combining Tumor Cryoablation with Anti–CTLA-4 Therapy

    Rebecca Waitz;Stephen B. Solomon;Elena N. Petre;Anne E. Trumble

  • Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Factors Affecting Outcomes—A 10-year Experience at a Single Center

    Waleed Shady;Elena N. Petre;Mithat Gonen;Joseph P. Erinjeri

  • DEFINING THE COMPLICATIONS OF CRYOABLATION AND RADIO FREQUENCY ABLATION OF SMALL RENAL TUMORS: A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW

    D. Brooke Johnson;Stephen B. Solomon;Li Ming Su;Edward D. Matsumoto

  • Thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases: a position paper by an international panel of ablation experts, the interventional oncology sans frontières meeting 2013

    Alice Gillams;Nahum Goldberg;Muneeb Ahmed;Reto Bale

  • Ablation of perivascular hepatic malignant tumors with irreversible electroporation.

    T. Peter Kingham;Ami M. Karkar;Michael I. D'Angelica;Peter J. Allen

  • Margin Size is an Independent Predictor of Local Tumor Progression After Ablation of Colon Cancer Liver Metastases

    Xiaodong Wang;Constantinos T. Sofocleous;Joseph P. Erinjeri;Elena N. Petre

  • Percutaneous image-guided cryoablation of painful metastases involving bone: multicenter trial.

    Matthew R. Callstrom;Damian E. Dupuy;Stephen B. Solomon;Robert A. Beres

  • Integrated Electroanatomic Mapping With Three-Dimensional Computed Tomographic Images for Real-Time Guided Ablations

    Jun Dong;Hugh Calkins;Stephen B Solomon;Shenghan Lai

  • Irreversible electroporation near the heart: ventricular arrhythmias can be prevented with ECG synchronization.

    Ajita Deodhar;Timm Dickfeld;Gordon W. Single;William C. Hamilton

  • Electrical impedance characterization of normal and cancerous human hepatic tissue.

    Shlomi Laufer;Antoni Ivorra;Victor E Reuter;Boris Rubinsky;Boris Rubinsky

Frequent Co-Authors

Mithat Gonen
Mithat Gonen Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Louis R. Kavoussi
Louis R. Kavoussi Northwell Health
Nancy E. Kemeny
Nancy E. Kemeny Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Howard I. Scher
Howard I. Scher Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Michael J. Morris
Michael J. Morris Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Larry Norton
Larry Norton Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
John L. Humm
John L. Humm Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Clifford A. Hudis
Clifford A. Hudis Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
William R. Jarnagin
William R. Jarnagin Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Yuman Fong
Yuman Fong City Of Hope National Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The healthcare field offers a wide range of online degree programs and alternative career pathways beyond the traditional route of studying medicine in the USA. For non-nurses seeking a fast-track into advanced nursing roles, direct entry msn programs online can provide a quicker transition, allowing students from other fields to earn a Master of Science in Nursing without holding a previous nursing degree.

If you are looking for less competitive entry requirements, some may consider the easiest rn program options, which typically offer higher acceptance rates and fewer prerequisite hurdles. For those interested in medical administration, financial aid for medical billing and coding online classes can help ease the financial burden while preparing for in-demand roles in the healthcare industry.

Additionally, some nursing schools offer admissions without standardized testing. If test requirements are a concern, review a nursing school that does not require teas test to find programs with flexible application processes. Exploring these related degrees and pathways can open new doors in healthcare, offering valuable career opportunities and diverse ways to make an impact.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen B. Solomon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles