World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
45
Citations
6402
World Ranking
6520
National Ranking
237

Martin J. Riddle publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin J. Riddle sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 116 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Martin J. Riddle D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin J. Riddle sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin J. Riddle is affiliated with the Australian Antarctic Division in Australia. Their work is connected to this institution, which focuses on polar research and related scientific activities.

There are no recent papers listed for Martin J. Riddle, nor are there records of frequent co-authors or common publication venues detailed in the available data. Similarly, there is no information regarding book publications or documented awards.

While specific fields, subfields, or main topics of study are not specified, Martin J. Riddle's association with the Australian Antarctic Division suggests involvement in polar sciences, environmental studies, or related disciplines typical of Antarctic research institutions. However, without detailed publication records or topics, this remains a contextual inference rather than explicit data.

Best Publications

  • Climate change and Southern Ocean ecosystems I: how changes in physical habitats directly affect marine biota

    Andrew J. Constable;Andrew J. Constable;Jessica Melbourne-Thomas;Jessica Melbourne-Thomas;Stuart P. Corney;Kevin R. Arrigo

  • Global biogeography of SAR11 marine bacteria

    Mark V Brown;Federico M Lauro;Matthew Z DeMaere;Les Muir

  • Management and remediation of contaminated sites at Casey Station, Antarctica

    Ian Snape;Martin J. Riddle;Jonathan S. Stark;Coleen M. Cole

  • Marine introductions in the Southern Ocean: an unrecognised hazard to biodiversity

    Patrick N Lewis;Chad L Hewitt;Martin Riddle;Andrew McMinn

  • Challenges to the Future Conservation of the Antarctic

    S. L. Chown;S. L. Chown;J. E. Lee;K. A. Hughes;J. Barnes

  • Characterisation of the dilute HCl extraction method for the identification of metal contamination in Antarctic marine sediments.

    I. Snape;R.C. Scouller;S.C. Stark;J. Stark

  • Light-driven tipping points in polar ecosystems.

    Graeme F. Clark;Jonathan S. Stark;Emma L. Johnston;John W. Runcie;John W. Runcie

  • Effects of metal contaminants on the development of the common Antarctic sea urchin Sterechinus neumayeri and comparisons of sensitivity with tropical and temperate echinoids

    C. K. King;M. J. Riddle

  • Toxic effects of contaminants in polar marine environments.

    Peter M. Chapman;Martin J. Riddle

  • Contaminants in the Arctic and the Antarctic: a comparison of sources, impacts, and remediation options

    John S. Poland;Martin J. Riddle;Barbara A. Zeeb

  • Antarctica’s Protected Areas Are Inadequate, Unrepresentative, and at Risk

    Justine D Shaw;Aleks Terauds;Martin J Riddle;Hugh P Possingham

  • Cost-efficient methods for marine pollution monitoring at Casey Station, East Antarctica: the choice of sieve mesh-size and taxonomic resolution

    Belinda W Thompson;Martin J Riddle;Jonathan S Stark

  • Human impacts in soft-sediment assemblages at Casey Station, East Antarctica: Spatial variation, taxonomic resolution and data transformation

    Jonathan S. Stark;Martin J. Riddle;Rodney D. Simpson

  • Human impacts in Antartic marine soft-sediment assemblages: correlations between multivariate biological patterns and environmental variables at Casey Station

    Jonathan S Stark;Martin J Riddle;Ian Snape;Rebecca C Scouller

  • Assisted passage or passive drift: a comparison of alternative transport mechanisms for non-indigenous coastal species into the Southern Ocean

    Patrick N. Lewis;Martin J. Riddle;Stephen D.A. Smith

  • Detrital pathways in a coral reef lagoon II. Detritus deposition, benthic microbial biomass and production*

    Judy Hansen;David Klumpp;Daniel Alongi;P Dayton

  • Biogeographic partitioning of Southern Ocean microorganisms revealed by metagenomics.

    David Wilkins;Federico M. Lauro;Timothy J. Williams;Matthew Z. Demaere

  • Investigation of evaporation and biodegradation of fuel spills in Antarctica: II-extent of natural attenuation at Casey Station.

    Ian Snape;Susan H. Ferguson;Paul McA. Harvey;Martin J. Riddle

  • The effects of petroleum hydrocarbon and heavy metal contamination of marine sediments on recruitment of Antarctic soft-sediment assemblages: a field experimental investigation

    Jonathan S Stark;Ian Snape;Martin J Riddle

  • Combined effects of ultraviolet‐B radiation and food shortage on the sensitivity of the Antarctic amphipod Paramoera walkeri to copper

    Matthias Liess;Olivier Champeau;Martin Riddle;Ralf Schulz

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian Snape
Ian Snape Frontline Mind
Jonathan S. Stark
Jonathan S. Stark Australian Antarctic Division
Stephen R. Rintoul
Stephen R. Rintoul CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research
Philippe Koubbi
Philippe Koubbi Biologie des Organismes et Écosystèmes Aquatiques
Ben Raymond
Ben Raymond Australian Antarctic Division
Peter M. Chapman
Peter M. Chapman Golder Associates (Canada)
Matthias Liess
Matthias Liess Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Eric J. Woehler
Eric J. Woehler Australasian Seabird Group ·
Andrew McMinn
Andrew McMinn University of Tasmania
Noel W. Davies
Noel W. Davies University of Leicester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Low cost options like an low cost online general studies degree allow students to build a broad foundation while managing tuition expenses effectively.

If you prefer a streamlined educational experience, some students might consider an easiest bachelor's degree to get, which can provide a quicker route into environmental or related fields without compromising essential skills.

For a more specialized focus, online geology degrees are excellent for those passionate about earth sciences, offering knowledge crucial for careers in resource management, conservation, and environmental assessment.

Additionally, advancing into technology-driven areas like spatial analysis through top programs such as top gis masters programs can lead to roles in environmental planning, disaster management, and urban development.

Choosing the right degree aligned with your interests and career goals is key to making a meaningful impact in the environmental sector.

Best Scientists Citing Martin J. Riddle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles